Michael D. Marlowe states:[1]yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while biblical scholar Daniel B. Wallace[2]Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machinehas counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.
Michael D. Marlowe states:[1]yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while biblical scholar Daniel B. Wallace[2]Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machinehas counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.
Michael D. Marlowe states:[1]yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while biblical scholar Daniel B. Wallace[2]Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machinehas counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.