Categoriae decem (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Categoriae decem" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
179th place
183rd place
low place
low place
8,366th place
5,247th place
5,235th place
3,879th place
2,467th place
2,049th place
1,601st place
1,117th place
3,336th place
2,097th place

leeds.ac.uk

seop.leeds.ac.uk

ohiolink.edu

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [1]: 'An anonymous paraphrase of the Categories falsely attributed to Augustine and traditionally known as Categoriae Decem has survived only because it was widely read and used in the early Middle Ages.'
  • The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[2] describes the work as ‘neoplatonic’; it also states 'In the early Middle Ages, Neoplatonic works such as the Categoriae decem were very important'[3].

ucc.ie

  • [5] Archived October 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, reference to John Marenbon, ‘John Scottus and the “Categoriae decem”’, in Werner Beierwaltes (ed.), Eriugena: Studien zu seinen Quellen, Vorträge des III. Internationalen Eriugena-Colloquiums, Freiburg im Breisgau, 27.–30. August 1979

utoronto.ca

chass.utoronto.ca

  • Eriugena's synthesis began with Dionysius' two branches of theology: apophatic and cataphatic. Apophasis was then considered from the perspective of the ten categories of Aristotle, interpreted through Augustine and the ps.-Augustinian Categoriae decem. ([4] p.23)

uu.nl

igitur-archive.library.uu.nl

web.archive.org

wz.cz

wyclif.wz.cz