Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910)" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

13books.google.com

3^rd place

6doi.org

2^nd place

3archive.org

6^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

archive.org

Mehra, The McMahon Line and After (1974), pp. 67–68: "What was strictly called the March country comprised the 'native' states on the Szechuan border east of the old Sino-Tibetan frontier on the Bum La. It embraced the kingdom of Derge, and the five Hor states, besides Chala or Tachienlu, Batang and Litang—the first two closely aligned to Lhasa, the latter three powerfully oriented towards Chengtu and Peking.". Mehra, Parshotam (1974). The McMahon Line and After: A Study of the Triangular Contest on India's North-eastern Frontier Between Britain, China and Tibet, 1904-47. Macmillan. ISBN 9780333157374 – via archive.org.
Lamb, The McMahon Line, Vol. 1 (1966), p. 11. Lamb, Alastair (1966), The McMahon Line: A Study in the Relations Between, India, China and Tibet, 1904 to 1914, Vol. 1: Morley, Minto and Non-Interference in Tibet, Routledge & K. Paul – via archive.org
Lamb, The McMahon Line, Vol. 1 (1966), p. 192. Lamb, Alastair (1966), The McMahon Line: A Study in the Relations Between, India, China and Tibet, 1904 to 1914, Vol. 1: Morley, Minto and Non-Interference in Tibet, Routledge & K. Paul – via archive.org

books.google.com

Goldstein, A History of Modern Tibet, Vol. 1 (1989), pp. 52–54. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1989), A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-91176-5
Goldstein, A History of Modern Tibet, Vol. 1 (1989), p. 44: "there can be no question regarding the subordination of Tibet to Manchu-ruled China following...the first decades of the eighteenth century.". Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1989), A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-91176-5
Norbu, China's Tibet Policy (2001), pp. 82–83: "If a strong amban (the title which replaced the Khan in 1711) coupled with a domestic or external crisis situation, coincided with a weak or minor Dalai Lama, Imperial China tended to take stronger measures, and to interfere more than usual in the internal affairs of Tibet.". Norbu, Dawa (2001), China's Tibet Policy, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-136-79793-4
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), p. 23: "Tibet, however, was not a party to these agreements and refused to cooperate in their implementation.". Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Norbu, China's Tibet Policy (2001), p. 169: "The Tibetans showed profound disregard for the treaty stipulations by demolishing the new border markers (pillars). That is, the Tibetans refused to recognize the British takeover of Sikkim and consequently the newly defined boundary between Sikkim and Tibet.... In 1895 the Commissioner of the Rajashahi Division was told flatly at Yatung that, as the Convention was made by the Chinese only, the Tibetan Government refused to recognize it.". Norbu, Dawa (2001), China's Tibet Policy, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-136-79793-4
Lamb, Tibet, China & India (1989), p. 6: "The Tibetans showed every sign of repudiating the Anglo-Chinese agreements of 1890 and 1893.". Lamb, Alastair (1989), Tibet, China & India, 1914-1950: a history of imperial diplomacy, Roxford Books, ISBN 978-0-907129-03-5
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), p. 23: "[The British viceroy] realized that China had no practical control over events in Tibet, so he obtained permission from London to try to initiate direct communication and relations with Lhasa.... But China had no control over the Dalai Lama, who ignored these admonitions and fled to exile in Mongolia, fearing he would be compelled to sign an unfavorable agreement.". Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), pp. 25–26: "Thus, at a time when China was unable to exercise real power in Tibet, Britain unilaterally reaffirmed Tibet's political subordination to China.". Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), p. 26. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Van Praag, The Status of Tibet (1987), p. 41. Van Praag, Michael C. Van Walt (1987), The Status of Tibet: History, Rights, And Prospects in International Law, Avalon Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8133-0394-9
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), p. 16. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Goldstein, The Snow Lion and the Dragon (1997), p. 27. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997), The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-21951-9
Norbu, Dawa (2011), Tibet: The Road Ahead, Ebury Publishing, p. 65, ISBN 978-1-4464-5968-3

doi.org

Ho, The Men Who Would Not be Amban (2008), pp. 231, 234. Ho, Dahpon David (April 2008), "The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would", Modern China, 34 (2): 210–246, doi:10.1177/0097700407312856
Ho, The Men Who Would Not be Amban (2008), p. 212. Ho, Dahpon David (April 2008), "The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would", Modern China, 34 (2): 210–246, doi:10.1177/0097700407312856
Ho, The Men Who Would Not be Amban (2008), p. 232: "Thus began a fateful chain of events that would have grave ramifications for Sino-Tibetan relations in the twentieth century.". Ho, Dahpon David (April 2008), "The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would", Modern China, 34 (2): 210–246, doi:10.1177/0097700407312856
Mehra, The Elusive Triangle (1990), p. 150: "Tibet also maintains that it did not accept the Anglo-Chinese Convention on Sikkim of 1890, nor the Trade Regulations framed under it three years later. It had not been consulted the drafting of either document.". Mehra, Parshotam (1990), "The Elusive Triangle: Tibet in India-China Relations—A Brief Conspectus", China Report, 26 (2): 145–156, doi:10.1177/000944559002600202
Chung, Comparing China's frontier politics (2018), p. 162: "The Dalai Lama's reduced standing demonstrated Beijing's intention to do away with Tibet's status as an autonomous dependency by exercising full sovereignty over it, and signaled that the traditional personal relationship between the (Dalai Lama) priest and his (Manchu Emperor) patron no longer existed.". Chung, Chien-peng (2018). "Comparing China's frontier politics: how much difference did a century make?". Nationalities Papers. 46 (1): 158–176. doi:10.1080/00905992.2017.1350151.
Ho, The Men Who Would Not be Amban (2008), pp. 217–220, 227–228. Ho, Dahpon David (April 2008), "The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would", Modern China, 34 (2): 210–246, doi:10.1177/0097700407312856

jstor.org

McGranahan, From Simla to Rongbatsa (2003), p. 43. McGranahan, Carole (Winter 2003), "From Simla to Rongbatsa: The British and the "Modern" Boundaries of Tibet", The Tibet Journal, 28 (4): 39–60, JSTOR 43302541