Christianity in the 1st century (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Christianity in the 1st century" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
6th place
6th place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
826th place
452nd place
26th place
20th place
70th place
63rd place
low place
low place
1,019th place
784th place
471st place
409th place
1,688th place
1,180th place
low place
low place
1,008th place
891st place
163rd place
185th place
6,248th place
9,253rd place
4th place
4th place
2,050th place
1,396th place
40th place
58th place
487th place
842nd place
27th place
51st place
low place
low place
5,051st place
3,281st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,877th place
1,532nd place
121st place
142nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,954th place
3,653rd place
9th place
13th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

academia.edu

  • Eusebius, Church History 3, 5, 3; Epiphanius, Panarion 29,7,7–8; 30, 2, 7; On Weights and Measures 15. On the flight to Pella see: Bourgel, Jonathan (2010). "The Jewish Christians' Move from Jerusalem as a pragmatic choice". In Dan Jaffe (ed.). Studies in Rabbinic Judaism and Early Christianity. Leyden: Brill. pp. 107–138.; P. H. R. van Houwelingen, "Fleeing forward: The departure of Christians from Jerusalem to Pella," Westminster Theological Journal 65 (2003), 181–200.

archive.org

biblegateway.com

biblehub.com

biblestudy.org

biblethingsinbibleways.wordpress.com

biblica.com

books.google.com

britannica.com

catholic-resources.org

ccel.org

christusrex.org

cirp.org

cosmolearning.org

directionjournal.org

doi.org

ehrmanblog.org

ellopos.net

equip.org

gci.org

google.com

ibri.org

jewishencyclopedia.com

jewishvirtuallibrary.org

jstor.org

larryhurtado.wordpress.com

leaderu.com

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

newadvent.org

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

oremus.org

bible.oremus.org

  • The Kingdom is described as both imminent (Mark 1:15) and already present in the ministry of Jesus (Luke 17:21) (Others interpret "Kingdom of God" to mean a way of living, or as a period of evangelization; no overall consensus among scholars has emerged on its meaning.[70][71]) Jesus promises inclusion in the Kingdom for those who accept his message (Mark 10:13–27)
  • See Why was Resurrection on "the Third Day"? Two Insights for explanations on the phrase "third day." According to Pinchas Lapide, "third day" may refer to Hosea 6:1–2:

    "Come, let us return to the Lord;
    for he has torn us, that he may heal us;
    he has struck us down, and he will bind us up.
    After two days he will revive us;
    on the third day he will raise us up,
    that we may live before him."

    See also 2 Kings 20:8: "Hezekiah said to Isaiah, 'What shall be the sign that the Lord will heal me, and that I shall go up to the house of the Lord on the third day?'"
  • Four years after the Council of Jerusalem, Paul wrote to the Galatians about the issue, which had become a serious controversy in their region. There was a burgeoning movement of Judaizers in the area that advocated adherence to the Mosaic Law, including circumcision. According to McGrath, Paul identified James the Just as the motivating force behind the Judaizing movement. Paul considered it a great threat to his doctrine of salvation through faith and addressed the issue with great detail in Galatians 3.[186]
  • Matt 24:34
  • Galatians 1:15–16, 2:7–9; Romans 11:13; 1 Timothy 2:7; 2 Timothy 1:11.
  • Acts 15:1
  • Acts 15
  • "1 Corinthians 15:3–15:41". oremus Bible Browser.

ourrabbijesus.com

  • See Why was Resurrection on "the Third Day"? Two Insights for explanations on the phrase "third day." According to Pinchas Lapide, "third day" may refer to Hosea 6:1–2:

    "Come, let us return to the Lord;
    for he has torn us, that he may heal us;
    he has struck us down, and he will bind us up.
    After two days he will revive us;
    on the third day he will raise us up,
    that we may live before him."

    See also 2 Kings 20:8: "Hezekiah said to Isaiah, 'What shall be the sign that the Lord will heal me, and that I shall go up to the house of the Lord on the third day?'"

patheos.com

religionfacts.com

scotthahn.com

scrollpublishing.com

  • "The Head Covering or Prayer Veil: 1 Corinthians 11:1–16". Scroll Publishing Company. Retrieved 2022-04-05. Around the year 200, at Carthage, North Africa, Tertullian wrote a tract entitled, "The Veiling of Virgins." Tertullian makes the argument that the passage applies to all females of age—not just to married women. … Earlier in his tract, Tertullian testified that the churches that were founded by the apostles did insist that both their married women and their virgins be veiled: Throughout Greece, and certain of its barbaric provinces, the majority of churches keep their virgins covered. In fact, this practice is followed in certain places beneath this African sky. So let no one ascribe this custom merely to the Gentile customs of the Greeks and barbarians. Moreover, I will put forth as models those churches that were founded by either apostles or apostolic men. … The Corinthians themselves understood him to speak in this manner. For to this very day the Corinthians veil their virgins. What the apostles taught, the disciples of the apostles confirmed. [Tertullian, The Veiling of Virgins The Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. 4 pp. 27–29,33] … In summary, the early Christians practiced exactly what 1 Cor. 11 says: Men prayed with their heads uncovered. Women prayed with their heads veiled. Nobody disputed this—regardless of where they lived—Europe, Mid-East, North Africa, or the Far East. This written evidence of the course of performance of the early Christians is corroborated by the archaeological record. The pictures we have from the second and third centuries from the catacombs and other places depict Christian women praying with a cloth veil on their heads. Some of those pictures are shown below. So the historical record is crystal clear. It reveals that the early generation of believers understood the head covering to be a cloth veil—not long hair. As Tertullian indicated, even the women who did not wish to follow Paul's teaching were not claiming that Paul was talking about long hair. Rather, they simply wore a small cloth in minimal obedience to his teaching. Nobody in the early Church claimed that Paul's instructions were merely a concession to Greek culture. Nobody claimed that they had anything to do with prostitutes or pagan priestesses.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

theologicalstudies.net

cdn.theologicalstudies.net

uncc.edu

religiousstudies.uncc.edu

usccb.org

bible.usccb.org

  • Catholic Encyclopedia: Proselyte: "The English term "proselyte" occurs only in the New Testament where it signifies a convert to the Jewish religion (Matthew 23:15; Acts 2:11; 6:5; etc.), though the same Greek word is commonly used in the Septuagint to designate a foreigner living in Judea. The term seems to have passed from an original local and chiefly political sense, in which it was used as early as 300 BC, to a technical and religious meaning in the Judaism of the New Testament epoch."

web.archive.org

westarinstitute.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • The Kingdom is described as both imminent (Mark 1:15) and already present in the ministry of Jesus (Luke 17:21) (Others interpret "Kingdom of God" to mean a way of living, or as a period of evangelization; no overall consensus among scholars has emerged on its meaning.[70][71]) Jesus promises inclusion in the Kingdom for those who accept his message (Mark 10:13–27)

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

youtube.com

zondervanacademic.com