Cinar Corp v Robinson (English Wikipedia)

a Canadian legal term describing the principle governing the amounts that can be awarded for damages arising from pain and suffering, originating in Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., 1978 CanLII 1, [1978] 2 SCR 229 (19 January 1978), Thornton v. School Dist. No. 57 (Prince George) et al., 1978 CanLII 12, [1978] 2 SCR 267 (19 January 1978), and Arnold v. Teno, 1978 CanLII 2, [1978] 2 SCR 287 (19 January 1978)
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992)., discussed, though not formally adopted, in Canadian jurisprudence: Delrina Corp. v. Triolet Systems Inc., 2002 CanLII 11389 at par. 43–47, 58 OR (3d) 339 (1 March 2002), Court of Appeal (Ontario, Canada)^[16]
The other six were Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, [2012] 2 SCR 231, Rogers Communications Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35, [2012] 2 SCR 283, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36, [2012] 2 SCR 326, Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2012 SCC 37, [2012] 2 SCR 345, Re:Sound v. Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada, 2012 SCC 38, [2012] 2 SCR 376, and Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 SCR 489. The first five cases, decided in July 2012, have since become known as the "Copyright Pentalogy".^[55]
Cinar Corporation v. Robinson, 2013 SCC 73 (23 December 2013)
Massie & Renwick, Limited v. Underwriters' Survey Bureau Ltd. et al., 1940 CanLII 1 at pp. 233–234, [1940] SCR 218 (19 January 1940)
Productions Avanti Ciné Vidéo inc. c. Favreau, 1999 CanLII 13258 (4 August 1999), Court of Appeal (Quebec, Canada)
R. v. Mohan, 1994 CanLII 80, [1994] 2 SCR 9 (5 May 1994), held to apply to intellectual property cases in Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27, [2011] 2 SCR 387 (26 May 2011)
Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 61 at par. 62, [2002] 3 SCR 269 (12 September 2002)
Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, 2004 SCC 34, [2004] 1 SCR 902 (21 May 2004)
Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc., 2002 SCC 34, [2002] 2 SCR 336 (28 March 2002)

casselsbrock.com

Casey Chisick; Peter Henein; Stephanie Voudoris (24 December 2013). "Copyright Castaway, Part II: The Supreme Court brings Robinson Crusoe ashore". Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP.

cbc.ca

"Co-CEOs resign at troubled Cinar". CBC News. 7 March 2000.

entertainmentmedialawsignal.com

Bob Tarantino (30 December 2013). "Cinar v Robinson — The Supreme Court Talks Entertainment Law". Heenan Blaikie.

fasken.com

"Cookie Jar Group acquires CINAR for US$144 million". Fasken Martineau. March 2004. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04. Retrieved 2014-01-04.

financialpost.com

business.financialpost.com

Theresa Tedesco (4 October 2011). "CEO ego best indicator of financial fraud, study says". Financial Post.

gov.mb.ca

msc.gov.mb.ca

"In the matter of Cinar Corporation (MRRS Decision Document)". Agence nationale d'encadrement du secteur financier. 24 March 2004. Archived from the original on January 4, 2014.

infofaillite.fr

"Redressement judiciaire Moonscoop". www.infofaillite.fr. Archived from the original on 2014-01-03. Retrieved 2014-01-03.

investorvoice.ca

Nary Lamey (16 March 2002). "QSC hides Cinar hearing". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-01-04.

justice.gc.ca

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

kidscreen.com

Jeremy Dickson (27 January 2014). "Ellipsanime acquires Moonscoop". Kidscreen.

lapresse.ca

Nathalie Petrowski (27 August 2009). "Claude retrouve Robinson" [Claude discovers Robinson again]. La Presse (in French). Montreal.
Joël-Denis Bellavance (23 December 2013). "Claude Robinson gagne son combat" [Claude Robinson wins his fight]. La Presse (in French). Montreal.

affaires.lapresse.ca

Caroline Touzin (20 July 2011). "Claude Robinson contre Cinar: les dommages réduits" [Claude Robinson v. Cinar: Damages reduced]. La Presse (in French). Montreal.

leagle.com

In Re CINAR Corp. Securities Litigation, 186 F.Supp.2d 279 (E.D. New York 2002).

leparisien.fr

"Dessins animés: l'administrateur judiciaire prend les rênes de Moonscoop" [Animation: The administrator takes the reins at Moonscoop]. Le Parisien (in French). Paris. 8 August 2013.

lexum.com

ccq.lexum.com

montrealgazette.com

Paul Delean (23 December 2013). "Supreme Court increases Claude Robinson's award in Cinar copyright case". Montreal Gazette.
Delean, Paul. "Fraud trial of Cinar founder Ronald Weinberg and investment execs begins in Quebec Superior Court". The Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on May 13, 2014.

nytimes.com

James Brooke (16 April 2000). "A Make-Believe World, on Screen and Off". The New York Times.

radio-canada.ca

"La Cour d'appel ordonne le dépôt de l'argent dû à Claude Robinson en fidéicommis" [The Court of Appeal orders the money owing to Claude Robinson to be deposited in trust]. Ici Radio-Canada Télé (in French). Montreal. 9 December 2011. Retrieved 29 December 2013.

ici.radio-canada.ca

"Claude Robinson obtient gain de cause, mais pas tout son argent" [Claude Robinson wins his case, but not all his money]. Ici Radio-Canada Télé (in French). Montreal. 23 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.

scc-csc.ca

SCC Case Information - Docket 34466 Supreme Court of Canada

shiftlaw.ca

Mekhala Chaubal (28 February 2013). "Cinar v. Robinson: Are Derivative Works Afloat in Murky Copyright Waters?". Shift Law Blog.

stanford.edu

securities.stanford.edu

"Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action, Proposed Partial Settlements And Settlement Hearing" (PDF). United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 9 September 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-09-15. Retrieved 2014-01-05.

sufficientdescription.com

Norman Siebrasse (26 February 2014). "Cinar, Monsanto and Convoyed Goods". Sufficient Description.

theglobeandmail.com

"The MAN who brought down CINAR". The Globe and Mail. 2000-05-26. Retrieved 2016-12-13.
Julian Sher (2 March 2011). "Cinar fraud arrest caps tale that rocked film industry". The Globe and Mail. Toronto.
Marotte, Bertrand; Van Praet, Nicolas (June 2, 2016). "Cinar founder Ronald Weinberg, two others found guilty on fraud charges". The Globe and Mail.
Marotte, Bertrand (June 22, 2016). "Cinar founder Weinberg given nearly nine years in fraud case". The Globe and Mail.

uottawa.ca

press.uottawa.ca

Michael Geist, ed. (2013). The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (PDF). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. ISBN 978-0-7766-2084-8. Retrieved 29 December 2013.

uqam.ca

cifo.uqam.ca

Michel Magnan; Denis Cormier; Pascale Lapointe-Antunes (2013). "Financial Reporting Frauds: A Manifestation of Hubris in the C-Suite? Some Exploratory Evidence" (PDF). École des sciences de la gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal.

web.archive.org

"Cookie Jar Group acquires CINAR for US$144 million". Fasken Martineau. March 2004. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04. Retrieved 2014-01-04.
"In the matter of Cinar Corporation (MRRS Decision Document)". Agence nationale d'encadrement du secteur financier. 24 March 2004. Archived from the original on January 4, 2014.
Nary Lamey (16 March 2002). "QSC hides Cinar hearing". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-01-04.
"Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action, Proposed Partial Settlements And Settlement Hearing" (PDF). United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 9 September 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-09-15. Retrieved 2014-01-05.
Delean, Paul. "Fraud trial of Cinar founder Ronald Weinberg and investment execs begins in Quebec Superior Court". The Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on May 13, 2014.
"Redressement judiciaire Moonscoop". www.infofaillite.fr. Archived from the original on 2014-01-03. Retrieved 2014-01-03.

wikipedia.org

fr.wikipedia.org

MoonScoop Group (France Animation's successor) was placed in bankruptcy protection ("redressement judiciaire") in France on 20 June 2013,^[69] from which its assets were disposed to Ellipsanime on 24 January 2014.^[70]^[71] Enforcement of the Ravensburger portion of the judgment is subject to specific requirements in German civil procedure.^[72]