City of David (archaeological site) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "City of David (archaeological site)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
5th place
5th place
3rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
26th place
20th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
11th place
8th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
497th place
371st place
low place
low place
1,286th place
698th place
121st place
142nd place
low place
low place
4,149th place
2,366th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
43rd place
161st place
3,233rd place
2,002nd place
230th place
214th place
155th place
138th place
1,870th place
1,304th place
6,640th place
3,977th place
4,983rd place
8,002nd place
571st place
403rd place
40th place
58th place
2,050th place
1,396th place
1,734th place
1,312th place
7,540th place
5,351st place
4,464th place
4,468th place
544th place
387th place
3,814th place
2,595th place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place

academia.edu

  • Greenberg, Rafael (2014b). A Privatized Heritage: How the Israel Antiquities Authority Relinquished Jerusalem's Past (Report).
  • Mazar, Amihai (2010). "Archaeology and the Biblical Narrative: The Case of the United Monarchy". Archaeological and Biblical Perspectives: 29. For conservative approaches defining the United Monarchy as a state "from Dan to Beer Sheba" including "conquered kingdoms" (Ammon, Moab, Edom) and "spheres of influence" in Geshur and Hamath cf. e.g. Ahlström (1993), 455–542; Meyers (1998); Lemaire (1999); Masters (2001); Stager (2003); Rainey (2006), 159–168; Kitchen (1997); Millard (1997; 2008). For a total denial of the historicity of the United Monarchy cf. e.g. Davies (1992), 67–68; others suggested a 'chiefdom' comprising a small region around Jerusalem, cf. Knauf (1997), 81–85; Niemann (1997), 252–299 and Finkelstein (1999). For a 'middle of the road' approach suggesting a United Monarchy of larger territorial scope though smaller than the biblical description cf., e.g., Miller (1997); Halpern (2001), 229–262; Liverani (2005), 92–101. The latter recently suggested a state comprising the territories of Judah and Ephraim during the time of David, that was subsequently enlarged to include areas of northern Samariaand influence areas in the Galilee and Transjordan. Na'aman (1992; 1996) once accepted the basic biography of David as authentic and later rejected the United Monarchy as a state, cf. id. (2007), 401–402.

aish.com

antiquities.org.il

archive.org

archpark.org.il

biblehub.com

books.google.com

britannica.com

cityofdavid.org.il

core.ac.uk

doi.org

emekshaveh.org

gnmagazine.org

  • Archaeology and the City of David, Rick Sherrod, Good News: A Magazine of Understanding, [2] Archived 2010-05-14 at the Wayback Machine

haaretz.com

hadashot-esi.org.il

harpers.org

ir-amim.org.il

israelnationalnews.com

jerusaleminstitute.org.il

  • Asmar, Ahmad (2020). "Silwan: Abstract" (PDF). Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research Projects. 528.

jpost.com

  • Jerusalem city wall dates back to King Solomon, Jerusalem Post, Fe. 23, 2010, [1]

jstor.org

  • Geva & De Groot (2017, pp. 32–49) "The prevailing view among researchers that the early city, the City of David, lay in the southern part of the eastern ridge next to the spring." Geva, Hillel [in Hebrew]; De Groot, Alon (2017). "The City of David Is Not on the Temple Mount After All". Israel Exploration Journal. 67 (1). Israel Exploration Society: 32–49. JSTOR 44474016.
  • Geva & De Groot 2017, pp. 32–49. Geva, Hillel [in Hebrew]; De Groot, Alon (2017). "The City of David Is Not on the Temple Mount After All". Israel Exploration Journal. 67 (1). Israel Exploration Society: 32–49. JSTOR 44474016.
  • Weill, R. (1947), La Cité de David, --- published in J. Simons, Jerusalem in the Old Testament, Leiden 1952. Mentioned by: Avigad, N. (1952). "The Fortification of the City of David". Israel Exploration Journal. 2 (4). Israel Exploration Society: 230–236. JSTOR 27924494.
  • Geva & De Groot 2017, p. 34. Geva, Hillel [in Hebrew]; De Groot, Alon (2017). "The City of David Is Not on the Temple Mount After All". Israel Exploration Journal. 67 (1). Israel Exploration Society: 32–49. JSTOR 44474016.
  • Ben-Ami 2011, p. 95. Ben-Ami, D. (2011). "The Northwestern Slope of the City of David during the Iron Age—Preliminary Findings". Eretz-Israel: Archaeological, Historical and Geographical Studies (in Hebrew). 30 (Amnon Ben-Tor volume). Israel Exploration Society: 95–104. JSTOR 23630964.
  • Mazar, Eilat; Horowitz, Wayne; Oshima, Takayoshi; Goren, Yuval (2010). "A Cuneiform Tablet from the Ophel in Jerusalem". Israel Exploration Journal. 60 (1): 4–21. ISSN 0021-2059. JSTOR 27927244.
  • Galor 2017b, p. 206. Galor, K. (2017b). "Jerusalem: Archaeologists Versus Residents?". Review of Middle East Studies. 51 (2). Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA): 203–213. doi:10.1017/rms.2017.90. JSTOR 26374492. S2CID 165026462.
  • Mendel-Geberovich, Anat; Shalev, Yiftah; Bocher, Efrat; Shalom, Nitsan; Gadot, Yuval (2019). "A Newly Discovered Personal Seal and Bulla from the Excavations of the GivꜤati Parking Lot, Jerusalem". Israel Exploration Journal. 69 (2): 154–174. ISSN 0021-2059. JSTOR 27098633.

loebclassics.com

  • Antiquities of the Jews, Chapter VII, 64-67: "Ἐκβαλὼν δὲ τοὺς Ἰεβουσαίους ἐκ τῆς ἄκρας καὶ αὐτὸς ἀνοικοδομήσας τὰ Ἱεροσόλυμα, πόλιν αὐτὴν Δαυίδου προσηγόρευσε, καὶ τὸν ἅπαντα χρόνον ἐν αὐτῇ διέτριβε βασιλεύων. ὁ δὲ χρόνος ὃν τῆς Ἰούδα φυλῆς ἦρξε μόνης ἐν Χεβρῶνι ἐγένετο ἔτη ἑπτὰ καὶ μῆνες ἕξ. ἀποδείξας δὲ βασίλειον τὰ Ἱεροσόλυμα λαμπροτέροις αἰεὶ καὶ μᾶλλον ἐχρῆτο τοῖς πράγμασι, τοῦ θεοῦ προνοουμένου κρείττω ποιεῖν αὐτὰ καὶ λαμβάνειν ἐπίδοσιν. 66πέμψας δὲ πρὸς αὐτὸν καὶ Εἴρωμος1 ὁ Τυρίων βασιλεὺς φιλίαν καὶ συμμαχίαν συνέθετο· ἔπεμψε δ᾿ αὐτῷ καὶ δωρεὰς ξύλα κέδρινα καὶ τεχνίτας ἄνδρας τέκτονας καὶ οἰκοδόμους, οἳ κατασκευάσειαν2 βασίλειον ἐν Ἱεροσολύμοις. Δαυίδης δὲ τήν τε κάτω3 πόλιν περιλαβὼν4 καὶ τὴν ἄκραν συνάψας αὐτῇ ἐποίησεν ἓν σῶμα, καὶ περιτειχίσας ἐπιμελητὴν 67τῶν τειχῶν κατέστησεν Ἰώαβον. πρῶτος οὖν Δαυίδης τοὺς Ἰεβουσαίους ἐξ Ἱεροσολύμων ἐκβαλὼν ἀφ᾿ ἑαυτοῦ προσηγόρευσε τὴν πόλιν· ἐπὶ γὰρ Ἁβράμου τοῦ προγόνου ἡμῶν Σόλυμα ἐκαλεῖτο..." "When David had driven the Jebusites out of the citadel and had himself rebuilt Jerusalem, he called it the City of David and continued to dwell in it for the whole length of time that he reigned. Now the time that he ruled over the tribe of Judah alone at Hebron was seven years and six months. But after he had chosen Jerusalem for his royal residence, he enjoyed ever more brilliant fortune because of God’s provident care in enhancing it and causing it to increase. Eirōmosa also, the king of Tyre, wrote to him, proposing friendship and alliance, and sent him gifts of cedar wood and skilled men as carpenters and builders to construct a palace in Jerusalem. And David enclosed the lower city and joined it to the citadel so as to form one whole, and, having put a wall around this, appointed Joab keeper of the walls. Thus David, who was the first to drive the Jebusites out of Jerusalem, named the city after himself"

mechon-mamre.org

megalim.org.il

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npg.org.uk

palestine-studies.org

  • Jeffery Yas (2000). "(Re)designing the City of David: Landscape, Narrative and Archaeology in Silwan". Jerusalem Quarterly. Retrieved 18 April 2023. Known to archaeologists and Biblical scholars as the site of the City of David, the western slope of the Kidron valley is referred to locally by a variety of aliases, and among them "Wadi Hilwe" (in English, "Beautiful Valley") seems to prevail.

parks.org.il

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

tau.ac.il

theguardian.com

  • Oliver Holmes, "Israel using tourism to legitimise settlements, says EU report," The Guardian 1 February 2018: "Archaeology and tourism development by government institutions as well as private settler organisations established what it said was a 'narrative based on historic continuity of the Jewish presence in the area at the expense of other religions and cultures'. Chief among them, the report warned, was the City of David, a government-funded archeological park in the Palestinian neighbourhood of Silwan that provides tours in the ruins of ancient Jerusalem. The site is operated by a settler organisation 'promoting an exclusively Jewish narrative, while detaching the place from its Palestinian surroundings'."

timesofisrael.com

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

uchicago.edu

www3.lib.uchicago.edu

web.archive.org

weizmann.ac.il

wikidata.org

wikipedia.org

he.wikipedia.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

ynetnews.com