Civil Rights Act of 1964 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Civil Rights Act of 1964" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
6th place
6th place
2,229th place
1,256th place
446th place
308th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
696th place
428th place
758th place
500th place
3rd place
3rd place
7th place
7th place
332nd place
246th place
70th place
63rd place
3,661st place
2,508th place
290th place
202nd place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
49th place
47th place
681st place
492nd place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,447th place
3,767th place
7,544th place
4,422nd place
310th place
208th place
3,452nd place
2,347th place
135th place
105th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
120th place
125th place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
1,115th place
741st place
6,864th place
3,942nd place
2,088th place
1,251st place
228th place
158th place
179th place
183rd place
4,038th place
2,198th place
41st place
34th place
low place
low place
low place
8,102nd place
low place
low place
22nd place
19th place
low place
low place
9,177th place
5,024th place
8,598th place
4,874th place
137th place
101st place
92nd place
72nd place
220th place
155th place

archive.org

archive.today

archives.gov

archives.gov

prologue.blogs.archives.gov

catalog.archives.gov

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

arkansasonline.com

books.google.com

boston.com

articles.boston.com

buzzfeed.com

civilrights.org

cnbc.com

congresslink.org

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu

  • Gold, Michael Evan. A Tale of Two Amendments: The Reasons Congress Added Sex to Title VII and Their Implication for the Issue of Comparable Worth. Faculty Publications – Collective Bargaining, Labor Law, and Labor History. Cornell, 1981 [1] Archived September 21, 2006, at the Wayback Machine

crmvet.org

dirksencenter.org

doi.org

eeoc.gov

finduslaw.com

gilderlehrman.org

govtrack.us

  • "H.R. 7152. Passage". GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2013.
  • "HR. 7152. Passage". GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
  • "H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a Resolution (H. RES. 789) Providing for House Approval of the Bill As Amended by the Senate". GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on September 10, 2019. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
  • "HR. 7152. Passage. Senate Vote #409 – Jun 19, 1964". GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
  • "HR. 7152. PASSAGE". Govtrack. Retrieved April 27, 2024.

h-net.org

networks.h-net.org

jfklibrary.org

  • Marshall, Burke (1962). "Speeches and interviews: Federal Protection of Negro Voting Rights". Law and Contemporary Problems. Duke University School of Law. Retrieved September 13, 2024. Despite these long-standing guarantees, the United States Commission on Civil Rights has found that racial denials of the right to vote occur in sections of eight states. In five of those states Negroes constitute more than a quarter of the adult population, but very few of these Negroes are registered to vote. For example, in Mississippi only five per cent are registered; in Alabama only fourteen per cent are registered; in South Carolina, sixteen per cent are registered; in Georgia, twenty-six per cent are registered; and in Louisiana, twenty-nine per cent are registered. Registration among adult whites invariably exceeds fifty per cent in the same areas, and Negroes are in the majority in ninety-one per cent of the counties where Negroes are in the majority. In ninety-seven counties fewer than three per cent of the adult Negroes are on the rolls. Indeed, in thirteen counties with sizable Negro populations the Negro voter rolls are significantly below the statewide percentage of eligible Negroes registered and in fifteen Negroes approaches the white voter percentage.
  • "Radio and television address on civil rights, 11 June 1963". John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. June 11, 1963. Archived from the original on September 30, 2018. Retrieved November 23, 2013.

jofreeman.com

jstor.org

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

law.justia.com

latimes.com

loc.gov

  • Supreme Court of the United States (1883). "U.S. Reports: Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)". U.S. Reports. Library of Congress. Retrieved September 13, 2024. 1. The 1st and 2d sections of the Civil Rights Act passed March 1st, 1875, are unconstitutional enactments as applied to the several States, not being authorized either by the XIllth or XTVth Amendments of the Constitution. 2. The XIVth Amendment is prohibitory upon the States only, and the legislation authorized to be adopted by Congress for enforcing it is not direct legislation on the matters respecting which the States are prohibited from making or enforcing certain laws, or doing certain acts, but is corrective legislation, such as may be necessary or proper for counteracting and .redressing tho effect of such laws or acts. 3. The XIIIth Amendment relates only to slavery and involuntary servitude (which it abolishes) ; and although, by its reflex action, it establishes universal freedom in the United States, and Congress may probably pass laws directly enforcing its provisions; yet such legislative power extends only to the subject of slavery and its incidents; and the denial of equal accommodations in inns, public conveyances and places of public amusement (which is forbidden by the sections in question), imposes no badge of slavery or involuntary servitude upon the party, but at most, infringes rights which are protected from State aggression by the XIVth Amendment. 4. Whether the accommodations and privileges sought to be protected by the 1st and 2d sections of the Civil Rights Act, are, or are not, rights constitutionally demandable; and if they are, in what form they are to be protected, is not now decided. 5. Nor is it decided whether the law as it stands is operative in the Territories and District of Columbia : the decision only relating to its validity as applied to the States. 6. Nor is it decided whether Congress, under the commercial power, may or may not pass a law securing to all persons equal accommodations on lines of public conveyance between two or more States.
  • Wilkins, Roy; Mitchell, Clarence; King, Martin Luther Jr; Lewis, John; Humphrey, Hubert; Parks, Gordon; Ellison, Ralph; Rustin, Bayard; Warren, Earl (October 10, 2014). "Civil Rights Era (1950–1963) – The Civil Rights Act of 1964: A Long Struggle for Freedom". Library of Congress. Archived from the original on January 9, 2020. Retrieved May 14, 2020.

millercenter.org

mpsanet.org

nationaljournal.com

natlawreview.com

nbcnews.com

neh.gov

npr.org

nps.gov

nytimes.com

ourdocuments.gov

oyez.org

researchgate.net

reuters.com

saylor.org

  • U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (1999) "Chapter 2: Laws and Regulations with Implications for Assessments". [2] Archived November 30, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

senate.gov

stanford.edu

cepa.stanford.edu

theatlantic.com

theguardian.com

thenation.com

ucsb.edu

presidency.ucsb.edu

upi.com

usatoday.com

web.archive.org

wfu.edu

users.wfu.edu

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

x.com