Climatic Research Unit (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Climatic Research Unit" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

12web.archive.org

1^st place

9uea.ac.uk

low place

6,989^th place

4bbc.co.uk

8^th place

10^th place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

2nature.com

234^th place

397^th place

2wsj.com

79^th place

65^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

2scientificamerican.com

896^th place

674^th place

1scotsman.com

413^th place

261^st place

1metoffice.gov.uk

2,735^th place

2,066^th place

1independent.co.uk

36^th place

33^rd place

1archive.org

6^th place

1eenews.net

low place

9,079^th place

1factcheck.org

7,075^th place

4,103^rd place

1google.com

163^rd place

185^th place

1reason.com

2,186^th place

1,287^th place

1deccanherald.com

516^th place

291^st place

1sciencemag.org

857^th place

3,832^nd place

1cbc.ca

115^th place

82^nd place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1gpo.gov

1,360^th place

845^th place

archive.org

David D. Kemp (1998). The environment dictionary. Psychology Press. pp. 72–3. ISBN 978-0-415-12752-3.

bbc.co.uk

Black, Richard (27 July 2011). "Climate unit releases virtually all remaining data". BBC News. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).
Richard Black (21 October 2011). "Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study". BBC News. Retrieved 15 November 2012.

news.bbc.co.uk

"Hackers target leading climate research unit". BBC News. 20 November 2009.

books.google.com

Lamb, H.H.; Clayton, K.M.; Wigley, T.M.L. (1997). "The Climatic Research Unit at Twenty-five Years". In Hulme, Michael; Barrow, Elaine (eds.). Climates of the British Isles: present, past and future. Routledge. p. xxvii–xxix. ISBN 978-0-415-13016-5.
Michael Sanderson (2002). The history of the University of East Anglia, Norwich. A&C Black. p. 285. ISBN 978-1-85285-336-5.
Sanderson, Michael (2002). The history of the University of East Anglia, Norwich. A&C Black. p. 345. ISBN 978-1-85285-336-5.

cbc.ca

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

deccanherald.com

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

eenews.net

Bravender, Robin (14 October 2009). "CLIMATE: Scientists return fire at sceptics in 'destroyed data' dispute". Greenwire.

factcheck.org

Henig, Jess (10 December 2009). "Climategate". FactCheck.org. Retrieved 21 June 2020.

google.com

Stringer, David (21 November 2009). "Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 24 November 2009. Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data.

gpo.gov

Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

independent.co.uk

McCarthy, Michael (8 July 2010). "'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails". The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.

metoffice.gov.uk

"Global temperature 2008: Another top-ten-year". Met Office. 3 January 2008. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2008.

nature.com

"Climate data spat intensifies". Nature. No. 460. 12 August 2009. p. 787. Subscription or payment required to read article.
"Closing the Climategate." Nature. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.

nytimes.com

Revkin, Andrew. (20 November 2009). Hacked E-Mail Is New Fodder for Climate Dispute. The New York Times. Global Edition: Environment. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

reason.com

Bailey, Ronald. The Scientific Tragedy of Climategate Reason. 1 December 2009

sciencemag.org

news.sciencemag.org

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

scientificamerican.com

Chameides, Bill. "Climategate Redux Archived 7 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine." Scientific American, 30 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

scotsman.com

news.scotsman.com

Brown, Craig (8 February 2005). "The forecast for Scotland: wet, wet, wet". The Scotsman. Retrieved 1 November 2008.

uea.ac.uk

cru.uea.ac.uk

"About the Climatic Research Unit". Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 9 May 2008.
"About the Climatic Research Unit". Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 5 May 2008.
"History of the Climatic Research Unit". Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia. Archived from the original on 18 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
"Data". CRU. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
"Temperature data (HadCRUT4)". CRU. 27 August 2015. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
"High-resolution gridded datasets". CRU. 1 September 2015. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
"Climate Monitor Online". 2004. Archived from the original on 4 June 2009. Retrieved 27 November 2013.

uea.ac.uk

"Tim Osborn to take over leadership of CRU" (Press release). University of East Anglia. 21 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
"CRU Update 3" (Press release). 1 December 2009. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 14 April 2010.

web.archive.org

"About the Climatic Research Unit". Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 9 May 2008.
"Global temperature 2008: Another top-ten-year". Met Office. 3 January 2008. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 1 November 2008.
"About the Climatic Research Unit". Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 5 May 2008.
"History of the Climatic Research Unit". Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia. Archived from the original on 18 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
"Tim Osborn to take over leadership of CRU" (Press release). University of East Anglia. 21 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
"CRU Update 3" (Press release). 1 December 2009. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 14 April 2010.
McCarthy, Michael (8 July 2010). "'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails". The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
"Climate Monitor Online". 2004. Archived from the original on 4 June 2009. Retrieved 27 November 2013.
Stringer, David (21 November 2009). "Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 24 November 2009. Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data.
Chameides, Bill. "Climategate Redux Archived 7 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine." Scientific American, 30 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

worldcat.org

Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

wsj.com

Johnson, Keith (23 November 2009). "Climate Strife Comes to Light". The Wall Street Journal.
Johnson, Keith. Climate Emails Stoke Debate The Wall Street Journal. 23 November 2009.