Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Climatic Research Unit (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Climatic Research Unit" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
12web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
9uea.ac.uk
low place
6,989th place
4bbc.co.uk
8th place
10th place
3books.google.com
3rd place
3rd place
2nature.com
234th place
397th place
2wsj.com
79th place
65th place
2nytimes.com
7th place
7th place
2scientificamerican.com
896th place
674th place
1scotsman.com
413th place
261st place
1metoffice.gov.uk
2,735th place
2,066th place
1independent.co.uk
36th place
33rd place
1archive.org
6th place
6th place
1eenews.net
low place
9,079th place
1factcheck.org
7,075th place
4,103rd place
1google.com
163rd place
185th place
1reason.com
2,186th place
1,287th place
1deccanherald.com
516th place
291st place
1sciencemag.org
857th place
3,832nd place
1cbc.ca
115th place
82nd place
1worldcat.org
5th place
5th place
1gpo.gov
1,360th place
845th place

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; English: 10th place)

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

cbc.ca (Global: 115th place; English: 82nd place)

deccanherald.com (Global: 516th place; English: 291st place)

eenews.net (Global: low place; English: 9,079th place)

factcheck.org (Global: 7,075th place; English: 4,103rd place)

  • Henig, Jess (10 December 2009). "Climategate". FactCheck.org. Retrieved 21 June 2020.

google.com (Global: 163rd place; English: 185th place)

  • Stringer, David (21 November 2009). "Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 24 November 2009. Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data.

gpo.gov (Global: 1,360th place; English: 845th place)

  • Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...  the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

independent.co.uk (Global: 36th place; English: 33rd place)

metoffice.gov.uk (Global: 2,735th place; English: 2,066th place)

nature.com (Global: 234th place; English: 397th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

reason.com (Global: 2,186th place; English: 1,287th place)

sciencemag.org (Global: 857th place; English: 3,832nd place)

news.sciencemag.org

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896th place; English: 674th place)

  • Chameides, Bill. "Climategate Redux Archived 7 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine." Scientific American, 30 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
  • Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...  the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

scotsman.com (Global: 413th place; English: 261st place)

news.scotsman.com

  • Brown, Craig (8 February 2005). "The forecast for Scotland: wet, wet, wet". The Scotsman. Retrieved 1 November 2008.

uea.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: 6,989th place)

cru.uea.ac.uk

uea.ac.uk

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...  the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; English: 65th place)