Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Collective ownership (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Collective ownership" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
4books.google.com
3rd place
3rd place
1web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
1pageabode.com
low place
low place
1jstor.org
26th place
20th place
1doi.org
2nd place
2nd place
1worldcat.org
5th place
5th place

books.google.com

  • The private property definition (for example that of a legal designation for the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities) may not correspond to its colloquial usage in socialist contexts, where there is a distinction between personal property and private property (the means of production). Personal property, also called possession, includes items intended for personal use (e.g. one's toothbrush, clothes, homes, vehicles, and sometimes money). It must be gained in a socially fair manner and the owner has a distributive right to exclude others (e.g. the right to command a fair share of personal property). Marxist socialists argue that private property is a social relation between the owner and persons deprived (not a relationship between person and thing), e.g. artifacts, factories, mines, dams, infrastructure, natural vegetation, mountains, deserts, and seas—these generate capital for the owner without the owner necessarily having to perform any physical labor. Conversely, those who perform labor using somebody else's private property are considered deprived of the value of their work in Marxist theory, and are instead given a salary that is disjointed from the value generated by the worker. In this context, private property and ownership means ownership of the means of production, not personal possessions. To socialists, including anarchists, private property refers to capital or the means of production while personal property refers to non-capital and consumer goods and services.
    For the anarchist view, see:
    • McKay, Iain, ed. (2008). "Why are anarchists against private property? – What is the difference between private property and possession?". An Anarchist FAQ. Edinburgh: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-84935-122-5. Archived from the original on February 27, 2020.
    • Stuart, Robert C.; Gregory, Paul Roderick (2013). The Global Economy and its Economic Systems. Boston: South-Western College Publishing. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-28505-535-0. There are three broad forms of property ownership – private, public, and collective (cooperative). Under private ownership, the three ownership rights ultimately belong to individuals, subject to limitations of disposition, use, and earnings. Under public ownership, these rights belong to the state. With collective ownership, property rights belong to the members of the collective.
    • Rosser, Marina V.; Rosser, J. Barkley Jr. (2003). Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. Boston: MIT Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-262-18234-8. Socialism is an economic system characterized by state or collective ownership of the means of production, land, and capital.
    • Stuart, Robert C.; Gregory, Paul Roderick (2013). The Global Economy and its Economic Systems. South-Western College Pub. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-28505-535-0. According to these definitions, socialism can be a theoretical or political idea that advocates a particular way of organizing economic and political life. It can be an actual economic system in which the state owns and controls resources, or it can be a system of collective or group ownership of property.

doi.org

jstor.org

pageabode.com

anarchism.pageabode.com

  • The private property definition (for example that of a legal designation for the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities) may not correspond to its colloquial usage in socialist contexts, where there is a distinction between personal property and private property (the means of production). Personal property, also called possession, includes items intended for personal use (e.g. one's toothbrush, clothes, homes, vehicles, and sometimes money). It must be gained in a socially fair manner and the owner has a distributive right to exclude others (e.g. the right to command a fair share of personal property). Marxist socialists argue that private property is a social relation between the owner and persons deprived (not a relationship between person and thing), e.g. artifacts, factories, mines, dams, infrastructure, natural vegetation, mountains, deserts, and seas—these generate capital for the owner without the owner necessarily having to perform any physical labor. Conversely, those who perform labor using somebody else's private property are considered deprived of the value of their work in Marxist theory, and are instead given a salary that is disjointed from the value generated by the worker. In this context, private property and ownership means ownership of the means of production, not personal possessions. To socialists, including anarchists, private property refers to capital or the means of production while personal property refers to non-capital and consumer goods and services.
    For the anarchist view, see:
    • McKay, Iain, ed. (2008). "Why are anarchists against private property? – What is the difference between private property and possession?". An Anarchist FAQ. Edinburgh: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-84935-122-5. Archived from the original on February 27, 2020.

web.archive.org

  • The private property definition (for example that of a legal designation for the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities) may not correspond to its colloquial usage in socialist contexts, where there is a distinction between personal property and private property (the means of production). Personal property, also called possession, includes items intended for personal use (e.g. one's toothbrush, clothes, homes, vehicles, and sometimes money). It must be gained in a socially fair manner and the owner has a distributive right to exclude others (e.g. the right to command a fair share of personal property). Marxist socialists argue that private property is a social relation between the owner and persons deprived (not a relationship between person and thing), e.g. artifacts, factories, mines, dams, infrastructure, natural vegetation, mountains, deserts, and seas—these generate capital for the owner without the owner necessarily having to perform any physical labor. Conversely, those who perform labor using somebody else's private property are considered deprived of the value of their work in Marxist theory, and are instead given a salary that is disjointed from the value generated by the worker. In this context, private property and ownership means ownership of the means of production, not personal possessions. To socialists, including anarchists, private property refers to capital or the means of production while personal property refers to non-capital and consumer goods and services.
    For the anarchist view, see:
    • McKay, Iain, ed. (2008). "Why are anarchists against private property? – What is the difference between private property and possession?". An Anarchist FAQ. Edinburgh: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-84935-122-5. Archived from the original on February 27, 2020.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org