Common law (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Common law" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
6th place
6th place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
332nd place
246th place
580th place
462nd place
5th place
5th place
3,324th place
2,257th place
low place
low place
696th place
428th place
703rd place
501st place
3,626th place
2,039th place
2,540th place
1,620th place
40th place
58th place
low place
low place
910th place
593rd place
4,784th place
3,078th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
36th place
33rd place
3,907th place
2,604th place
18th place
17th place
2,302nd place
1,389th place
8,382nd place
5,224th place
2,120th place
1,328th place
1,295th place
1,196th place
low place
low place
485th place
440th place
3rd place
3rd place
489th place
377th place
1,648th place
1,137th place
low place
low place
869th place
864th place
7,447th place
4,622nd place
3,544th place
1,912th place
7,434th place
5,813th place
2,113th place
1,465th place
305th place
264th place
low place
low place
low place
7,554th place
5,076th place
3,404th place
low place
low place
1,880th place
1,218th place
low place
low place
1,424th place
1,680th place
9,051st place
6,321st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,212th place
5,638th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

american.edu

digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

  • Washington Probate, "Estate Planning & Probate Glossary", Washington (State) Probate, s.v. "common law" Archived 25 May 2017 at Archive-It, 8 December 2008:, retrieved on 7 November 2009. "2. The system of law originated and developed in England and based on prior court decisions, on the doctrines implicit in those decisions, and on customs and usages rather than codified written law. Contrast: CIVIL LAW."

archive.org

  • Garner, Bryan A. (2001) [1995]. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 177. ISBN 9780195077698. common law. A. As Noun—in Broad Contrasts. In modern usage, common law is contrasted with a number of other terms. First, in denoting the body of judge-made law based on that developed originally in England, common law is contrasted by comparative jurists to civil law, q.v. Second, 'with the development of equity and equitable rights and remedies, common law and equitable courts, procedure, rights, remedies, etc., are frequently contrasted, and in this sense common law is distinguished from equity' (OCL). Third, the term is similarly distinguished from ecclesiastical law. Fourth, it is occasionally used to denote the law common to the country as a whole-as distinguished from law that has only local applications. Finally, and perhaps most commonly within Anglo-American jurisdictions, common law is contrasted with statutory law <statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed>.
  • Langbein, Lerner & Smith (2009), p. 4. Langbein, John H.; Lerner, Renée Lettow; Smith, Bruce P. (14 August 2009). History of the Common Law: The Development of Anglo-American Legal Institutions (1st ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers. ISBN 9780735562905.
  • Garner, Bryan A. (2001). A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd, revised ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195077698. "common law" is contrasted by comparative jurists to civil law.
  • One history of the law before the Norman Conquest is Pollock and Maitland, The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I, .[4]
  • The Common Law "O. W. Holmes, Jr., The Common Law". 1882.
  • Salmond 1907, p. 34 Salmond, John William (1907). Jurisprudence: The Theory of the Law (2nd ed.). London: Stevens and Haynes. p. 32. OCLC 1384458.
  • Glenn 2000, p. 255 Glenn, H. Patrick (2000). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876575-2.
  • Glenn 2000, p. 276 Glenn, H. Patrick (2000). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876575-2.
  • Glenn 2000, p. 273 Glenn, H. Patrick (2000). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876575-2.

atlas101.ca

  • "Common Law". Atlas of Public Management. Retrieved 2 February 2024.

bailii.org

  • It is characteristic of the common law to adopt an approach based "on precedent, and on the development of the law incrementally and by analogy with established authorities". Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 at para. 21

bartleby.com

  • Cambridge History of English and American Literature The Year Books and their Value[5]

bc.edu

lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu

  • Jane Kent Gionfriddo, Thinking Like a Lawyer: The Heuristics of Case Synthesis, 40 Texas Tech. L.Rev. 1 (Sep. 2007) [1] [2]

berkeley.edu

law.berkeley.edu

  • "The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions" (PDF). Berkeley Law. 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 24 November 2024. Common law is generally uncodified. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. The precedents to be applied in the decision of each new case are determined by the presiding judge.
  • "The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions". Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  • The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Robbins Collection, University of California at Berkeley.[6] Archived 22 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine

books.google.com

britannica.com

bu.edu

cambridge.org

constitutionnet.org

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

  • "common law". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 27 November 2024. Common law is law that is derived from judicial decisions instead of from statutes. American courts originally fashioned common law rules based on English common law until the American legal system was sufficiently mature to create common law rules either from direct precedent or by analogy to comparable areas of decided law.
  • "stare decisis". LII / Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on 24 November 2024. Retrieved 27 November 2024. Stare decisis is the doctrine that courts will adhere to precedent in making their decisions. Stare decisis means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision. The previous deciding-court must have binding authority over the court; otherwise, the previous decision is merely persuasive authority.
  • "case of first impression". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 27 November 2024. A case of first impression is a case that presents a legal issue that has never been decided by the governing jurisdiction. ... A case of first impression lacks controlling precedent. In other words, a court deciding a case of first impression cannot rely on prior decisions nor is the court bound by stare decisis. To adopt the most persuasive rule of law, courts will look to various sources for guidance.

doi.org

duke.edu

law.duke.edu

  • "Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) | Duke University School of Law". law.duke.edu. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 29 November 2024. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a comprehensive code addressing most aspects of commercial law, is generally viewed as one of the most important developments in American law. The UCC text and draft revisions are written by experts in commercial law and submitted as drafts for approval to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (referred to as the Uniform Law Commissioners), in collaboration with the American Law Institute. The Commissioners are all attorneys, qualified to practice law, including state and federal judges, legislators and law professors from throughout the United States and its territories. These quasi-public organizations meet and decide whether to endorse the drafts or to send them back to the experts for revision. The revision process may result in several different revisions of the original draft. Once a draft is endorsed, the Uniform Law Commissioners recommend that the states adopt these rules. The UCC is a model code, so it does not have legal effect in a jurisdiction unless UCC provisions are enacted by the individual state legislatures as statutes. Currently, the UCC (in whole or in part) has been enacted, with some local variation, in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

fca-caf.gc.ca

files.wordpress.com

kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com

fordham.edu

legacy.fordham.edu

geron.org

gutenberg.org

harvard.edu

law.harvard.edu

  • Documents from Medieval and Early Modern England from the National Archives in London.[3] Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine Publications of the Selden Society include a Year Books series and other volumes transcribing and translating the original manuscripts of early common law cases and law reports, each volume having its editor's scholarly introduction. Publications of the Selden Society

independent.co.uk

  • Osley, Richard (23 November 2008). "London becomes litigation capital of the world". The Independent. London. London is also forum for many defamation cases, because UK law is more plaintiff-friendly—in the United States, the First Amendment protection for freedom of the press allows for statements concerning public figures of questionable veracity, where in the UK, those same statements support a judgment for libel. This relative weakness of protection for freedom of speech led the United States to limit enforcement of foreign (in particular, English) defamation judgements in the SPEECH Act of 2010, thus making England and Wales a less attractive forum for such cases.

indiana.edu

ijgls.indiana.edu

jstor.org

  • Carpenter, Charles E. (1917). "Court Decisions and the Common Law". Columbia Law Review. 17 (7): 593–607. JSTOR 1112172. (common law court "decisions are themselves law, or rather the rules which the courts lay down in making the decisions constitute law.")
  • Pound, Roscoe (1907). "Spurious Interpretation". Columbia Law Review. 7 (6): 381. doi:10.2307/1109940. JSTOR 1109940. The object of genuine interpretation is to discover the rule which the law-maker intended to establish; to discover the intention with which the law-maker made the rule, or the sense which he attached to the words wherein the rule is expressed ... the object of spurious interpretation is to make, unmake, or remake, and not merely to discover ... it is essentially a legislative, not a judicial process, made necessary in formative periods by the paucity of principles, feebleness of legislation and rigidity of rules characteristic of archaic law. So long as law is regarded as sacred, or for any reason as incapable of alteration, such a process is necessary for growth, but surviving into periods of legislation, it becomes a source of confusion.
  • Jeffery, Clarence Ray (1957). "The Development of Crime in Early English Society". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science. 47 (6): 647–666. doi:10.2307/1140057. JSTOR 1140057.
  • Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. (1897). "The Path of the Law". Harvard Law Review. 10 (8): 457–478. doi:10.2307/1322028. JSTOR 1322028.

juriglobe.ca

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

  • "Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)". Justia Law. Retrieved 27 November 2024. It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Courts must decide on the operation of each.
  • See, e.g., Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943) (giving federal courts the authority to fashion common law rules with respect to issues of federal power, in this case negotiable instruments backed by the federal government); International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918) (creating a cause of action for misappropriation of "hot news" that lacks any statutory grounding)

justice.gc.ca

laws.justice.gc.ca

canada.justice.gc.ca

  • "About Bijuralism". Government of Canada, Department of Justice, Legislative Services Branch. 14 November 2008.

lawfulpath.com

lawgovpol.com

lawofisrael.com

lawteacher.net

lmu.edu

digitalcommons.lmu.edu

lsu.edu

faculty.lsu.edu

digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu

  • Judicial Discretion in the Civil Law In the common talk among lawyers, it has even been said that in the Civil Law system legislators are almost like gods, and judges not even men."

digitalcommons.lsu.edu

napoleon-series.org

nellco.org

lsr.nellco.org

nlnrac.org

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

nyulawglobal.org

oup.com

academic.oup.com

oxfordscholarship.com

port.ac.uk

compass.port.ac.uk

radford.edu

singaporelaw.sg

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

state.ny.us

courts.state.ny.us

supremecourt.gov.pk

supremecourt.uk

supremecourtofindia.nic.in

uh.edu

aalt.law.uh.edu

  • Documents from Medieval and Early Modern England from the National Archives in London.[3] Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine Publications of the Selden Society include a Year Books series and other volumes transcribing and translating the original manuscripts of early common law cases and law reports, each volume having its editor's scholarly introduction. Publications of the Selden Society

uniformlaws.org

  • "Uniform Commercial Code". www.uniformlaws.org. Retrieved 29 November 2024. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a comprehensive set of laws governing all commercial transactions in the United States. It is not a federal law, but a uniformly adopted state law. Uniformity of law is essential in this area for the interstate transaction of business. Because the UCC has been universally adopted, businesses can enter into contracts with confidence that the terms will be enforced in the same way by the courts of every American jurisdiction. The resulting certainty of business relationships allows businesses to grow and the American economy to thrive. For this reason, the UCC has been called 'the backbone of American commerce.'

vlex.com

case-law.vlex.com

wa-probate.com

  • Washington Probate, "Estate Planning & Probate Glossary", Washington (State) Probate, s.v. "common law" Archived 25 May 2017 at Archive-It, 8 December 2008:, retrieved on 7 November 2009. "2. The system of law originated and developed in England and based on prior court decisions, on the doctrines implicit in those decisions, and on customs and usages rather than codified written law. Contrast: CIVIL LAW."

wdl.org

web.archive.org

  • Alphabetical Index of the 192 United Nations Member States and Corresponding Legal Systems Archived 22 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Website of the Faculty of Law of the University of Ottawa
  • "The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions" (PDF). Berkeley Law. 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 24 November 2024. Common law is generally uncodified. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. The precedents to be applied in the decision of each new case are determined by the presiding judge.
  • "stare decisis". LII / Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on 24 November 2024. Retrieved 27 November 2024. Stare decisis is the doctrine that courts will adhere to precedent in making their decisions. Stare decisis means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision. The previous deciding-court must have binding authority over the court; otherwise, the previous decision is merely persuasive authority.
  • "Juriglobe". www.juriglobe.ca. Archived from the original on 2 November 2024. Retrieved 28 November 2024.
  • "LawGovPol, Common law: advantages and disadvantages". Archived from the original on 21 July 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  • See, e.g., Yeo Tiong Min, "A Note on Some Differences in English Law, New York Law, and Singapore Law Archived 2007-05-02 at the Wayback Machine" (2006).
  • Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey P. Miller (2008). The Flight to New York: An Empirical Study of Choice of Law and Choice of Forum Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies' Contracts. New York University Law and Economics Working Papers. Paper 124, Archived 1 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine (based on a survey of 2882 contracts, "New York law plays a role for major corporate contracts similar to the role Delaware law plays in the limited setting of corporate governance disputes. ... New York's dominance is striking. It is the choice of law in approximately 46 percent of contracts", and if merger contracts excluded, over half).
  • Documents from Medieval and Early Modern England from the National Archives in London.[3] Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine Publications of the Selden Society include a Year Books series and other volumes transcribing and translating the original manuscripts of early common law cases and law reports, each volume having its editor's scholarly introduction. Publications of the Selden Society
  • F. W. Maitland, The Forms of Action at Common Law, 1909, Lecture I, Archived 22 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine or John Jay McKelvey, Principles of Common Law Pleading (1894) or Ames, Chitty, Stephen, Thayer and other writers named in the preface of Perry's Common-law Pleading: its history and principles (Boston, 1897) or Koffler and Reppy, 1969, Handbook of Common Law Pleading
  • "Description and History of Common Law". Archived from the original on 28 February 2017. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  • "The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions". Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  • "In some cases, according to some expert observers, important principles were not included in the legislation because the drafters, not having any experience in commerce, could not appreciate the importance of the principles and the advisors could not convince them of the necessity of certain principles. For example, under legislation adopted, boards of directors can be held criminally and civilly liable if the corporation does not turn a profit, not exactly a great incentive to risk taking. It illustrates the difficulty of changing societal norms. At the same time, in deciding commercial cases, the judges are not to examine the prevailing practices regarding what agreements mean within the trade at the time the contract was entered into, a fundamental concept in western commerce and judicial practice." Rule of Law Assistance Impact Assessment: Armenia
  • The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Robbins Collection, University of California at Berkeley.[6] Archived 22 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  • LangstoT. "Types of Legal System: Adversarial v. Investigatory Trial Systems". compass.port.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 25 November 2017. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  • "Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) | Duke University School of Law". law.duke.edu. Archived from the original on 26 July 2024. Retrieved 29 November 2024. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a comprehensive code addressing most aspects of commercial law, is generally viewed as one of the most important developments in American law. The UCC text and draft revisions are written by experts in commercial law and submitted as drafts for approval to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (referred to as the Uniform Law Commissioners), in collaboration with the American Law Institute. The Commissioners are all attorneys, qualified to practice law, including state and federal judges, legislators and law professors from throughout the United States and its territories. These quasi-public organizations meet and decide whether to endorse the drafts or to send them back to the experts for revision. The revision process may result in several different revisions of the original draft. Once a draft is endorsed, the Uniform Law Commissioners recommend that the states adopt these rules. The UCC is a model code, so it does not have legal effect in a jurisdiction unless UCC provisions are enacted by the individual state legislatures as statutes. Currently, the UCC (in whole or in part) has been enacted, with some local variation, in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
  • Court, The Supreme. "Role of The Supreme Court – The Supreme Court". www.supremecourt.uk. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  • K. G. Balakrishnan (23–24 March 2008). An Overview of the Indian Justice Delivery Mechanism (PDF) (Speech). International Conference of the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of the World. Abu Dhabi. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 1 August 2012. India, being a common law country, derives most of its modern judicial framework from the British legal system.
  • "Federation of Pakistan v. Bhatti, "in a common law jurisdiction such as ours"" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 22 February 2012.
  • "Federal Court of Appeal – Home". Federal Court of Appeal. Archived from the original on 4 May 2008. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  • "Supreme court decisions database". Archived from the original on 9 April 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2014.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

  • Lobban, Michael "Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II | year=2004 | work=Law and History Review, 2004 (University of Illinois Press) . ISSN 0738-2480.