Copyright (English Wikipedia)

The Italian state of Venetia, adopting Napoleon's law, calls it "diritto d’autore" as part of the "proprietà intellettuale": "la più preziosa e la più sacra delle proprietà" - see: "Governare istruzione e stampa. Le riforme Napoleoniche". 123dok. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023.

admin.ch

ejpd.admin.ch

"Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Internet: Der bestehende rechtliche Rahmen genügt". Ejpd.admin.ch. Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2020.

ala.org

"DMCA: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act". American Library Association. Archived from the original on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2022.

bitlaw.com

Daniel A. Tysver. "Works Unprotected by Copyright Law". Bitlaw.

books.google.com

Blackshaw, Ian S. (20 October 2011). Sports Marketing Agreements: Legal, Fiscal and Practical Aspects. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9789067047937 – via Google Books.
Kaufman, Roy (16 July 2008). Publishing Forms and Contracts. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190451264 – via Google Books.
Goldstein & Hugenholtz 2019, p. 3. Goldstein, Paul; Hugenholtz, P. Bernt (30 August 2019). International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-006063-3.
Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-84542-282-0 – via Google Books.
MacQueen, Hector L; Charlotte Waelde; Graeme T Laurie (2007). Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford University Press. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-19-926339-4 – via Google Books.
Simon, Stokes (2001). Art and copyright. Hart Publishing. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-1-84113-225-9 – via Google Books.
Nimmer, David (2003). Copyright: Sacred Text, Technology, and the DMCA. Kluwer Law International. p. 63. ISBN 978-90-411-8876-2. OCLC 50606064 – via Google Books.
WIPO Guide on the Licensing of Copyright and Related Rights. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2004. p. 15. ISBN 978-92-805-1271-7.
WIPO Guide on the Licensing of Copyright and Related Rights. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2004. p. 8. ISBN 978-92-805-1271-7.
WIPO Guide on the Licensing of Copyright and Related Rights. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2004. p. 16. ISBN 978-92-805-1271-7.

bpb.de

Philipp Otto Aktualisierung; Valie Djordjevic Sebastian Deterding (15 July 2013). "Urheberrecht und Copyright". bpb.de (in German). Retrieved 11 December 2023.

britannica.com

"Copyright | Definition, Examples, & Facts". Britannica. 18 November 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.

casetext.com

"Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 815 F.3d 1145". Casetext Search + Citator. Retrieved 24 August 2024.

cbc.ca

Moran, Padraig (17 July 2023). "Dupes offer cheap fashion to Canadians, but small businesses say they're paying the price". CBC Radio. Retrieved 31 August 2023.

copyright.gov

"Copyright Basics" (PDF). www.copyright.gov. U.S. Copyright Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
"International Copyright Relations of the United States", U.S. Copyright Office Circular No. 38a, August 2003.
"Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright" (PDF). copyright.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
"Copyright in General (FAQ)". U.S. Copyright Office. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
See US copyright law
"U.S. Copyright Office – Information Circular" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
"authors, attribution, and integrity: examining moral rights in the united states" (PDF). U.S. Copyright Office. April 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
"Works Not Protected by Copyright" (PDF). U.S. Copyright Office. 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
"The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 - U.S. Copyright Office Summary" (PDF). Copyright Office. December 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2003. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
"Chapter 1 – Circular 92". U.S. Copyright Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2024.
"General Guide to the Copyright Act of 1976", US Copyright Office, ch.8, p.11, September 1977.

copyright.ht

165 Parties to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine as of May 2012.

copyrighthistory.com

"Statute of Anne". Copyrighthistory.com. Retrieved 8 June 2012.

copyrightuser.org

"The Mutilated Work" (PDF). Copyright User. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

copyright.cornell.edu

"Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States"., Cornell University.
See Peter B. Hirtle, "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States 1 January 2015" online at footnote 8 Archived 26 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine

www4.law.cornell.edu

"17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use". Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 16 June 2009.

creativecommons.org

"Creative Commons Website". creativecommons.org. Retrieved 24 October 2011.

digital-law-online.info

Lee A. Hollaar. "Legal Protection of Digital Information". p. Chapter 1: An Overview of Copyright, Section II.E. Ideas Versus Expression.

digitalcitizensalliance.org

"Advertising Fuels $1.34 Billion Illegal Piracy Market, Report by Digital Citizens Alliance and White Bullet Finds". Digital Citizens Alliance. Retrieved 2 September 2021.

doi.org

Nipps, Karen (2014). "Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662" (PDF). The Library Quarterly. 84 (4): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. ISSN 0024-2519. S2CID 144070638. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
Giorcelli, Michela; Moser, Petra (March 2020). "Copyright and Creativity. Evidence from Italian Opera During the Napoleonic Age". National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. doi:10.3386/w26885.
World Intellectual Property Organization (2016). Understanding Copyright and Related Rights (PDF). WIPO. p. 8. doi:10.34667/tind.36289. ISBN 9789280528046. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
Owen, L. (2001). "Piracy". Learned Publishing. 14: 67–70. doi:10.1087/09531510125100313. S2CID 221957508.

economie.gouv.fr

In French civic law the droit d'auteur is part of the Code de la propriété intellectuelle

edri.org

"MEPs ignore expert advice and vote for mass internet censorship". European Digital Rights. 20 June 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2018.
"Copyright Week 2019: Copyright as a tool of censorship". European Digital Rights (EDRi). Retrieved 27 February 2021.

ghostarchive.org

"Copyright Basics" (PDF). www.copyright.gov. U.S. Copyright Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
Nipps, Karen (2014). "Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662" (PDF). The Library Quarterly. 84 (4): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. ISSN 0024-2519. S2CID 144070638. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
"Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright" (PDF). copyright.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
"U.S. Copyright Office – Information Circular" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
"IP Commission Report" (PDF). NBR.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2021.
"Impacts of Digital Piracy on the U.S. Economy" (PDF). GlobalInnovationPolicyCenter.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
"The Mutilated Work" (PDF). Copyright User. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
"authors, attribution, and integrity: examining moral rights in the united states" (PDF). U.S. Copyright Office. April 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
"Works Not Protected by Copyright" (PDF). U.S. Copyright Office. 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.

harvard.edu

dash.harvard.edu

Nipps, Karen (2014). "Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662" (PDF). The Library Quarterly. 84 (4): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. ISSN 0024-2519. S2CID 144070638. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.

cyber.law.harvard.edu

See Harvard Law School, Module 3: The Scope of Copyright Law. See also Tyler T. Ochoa, Copyright, Derivative Works and Fixation: Is Galoob a Mirage, or Does the Form(GEN) of the Alleged Derivative Work Matter?, 20 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 991, 999–1002 (2003) ("Thus, both the text of the Act and its legislative history demonstrate that Congress intended that a derivative work does not need to be fixed in order to infringe."). The legislative history of the 1976 Copyright Act says this difference was intended to address transitory works such as ballets, pantomimes, improvised performances, dumb shows, mime performances, and dancing.

inpi.fr

"Le droit d'auteur". INPI.fr (in French). 28 July 2015. Retrieved 11 December 2023.

ipo.gov.uk

"Copyright Registers" Archived 5 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office
"Automatic right", United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office

ivir.nl

Dommerink, Egbert (2004). "Lessen uit de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht" (PDF). University of Amsterdam, Institute for Information Law / Publications. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 August 2023.

jetlaw.org

"Journal Conventions". Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2022.

jstor.org

Day O'Connor, Sandra (2002). "Copyright Law from an American Perspective". Irish Jurist. 37: 16–22. JSTOR 44027015.

merriam-webster.com

"Definition of Copyright". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 20 December 2018.

mondaq.com

nber.org

Giorcelli, Michela; Moser, Petra (March 2020). "Copyright and Creativity. Evidence from Italian Opera During the Napoleonic Age". National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. doi:10.3386/w26885.

nbr.org

"IP Commission Report" (PDF). NBR.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2021.

oba.org

Monastero, Alessia (5 December 2019). "More Than Just a Trend: The Copyright Protection of Fashion Designs". Ontario Bar Association. Archived from the original on 31 August 2023. Retrieved 31 August 2023.

opsi.gov.uk

The Duration of Copyright and Rights in Performances Regulations 1995, part II, Amendments of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

oxforddictionaries.com

en.oxforddictionaries.com

"Definition of copyright". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 29 September 2016. Retrieved 20 December 2018.

rnib.org.uk

"Copyright (Visually Impaired Persons) Act 2002". Royal National Institute of Blind People. 1 January 2011. Archived from the original on 7 September 2009. Retrieved 11 August 2016.

scu.edu

digitalcommons.law.scu.edu

See Harvard Law School, Module 3: The Scope of Copyright Law. See also Tyler T. Ochoa, Copyright, Derivative Works and Fixation: Is Galoob a Mirage, or Does the Form(GEN) of the Alleged Derivative Work Matter?, 20 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 991, 999–1002 (2003) ("Thus, both the text of the Act and its legislative history demonstrate that Congress intended that a derivative work does not need to be fixed in order to infringe."). The legislative history of the 1976 Copyright Act says this difference was intended to address transitory works such as ballets, pantomimes, improvised performances, dumb shows, mime performances, and dancing.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Nipps, Karen (2014). "Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662" (PDF). The Library Quarterly. 84 (4): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. ISSN 0024-2519. S2CID 144070638. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
Owen, L. (2001). "Piracy". Learned Publishing. 14: 67–70. doi:10.1087/09531510125100313. S2CID 221957508.

societyofauthors.org

www2.societyofauthors.org

Society of Authors, Guidance on Copyright and Permissions, version 2, Section 1(b)(iv), published in September 2016, accessed on 7 October 2024

spiegel.de

Thadeusz, Frank (18 August 2010). "No Copyright Law: The Real Reason for Germany's Industrial Expansion?". Spiegel Online.
Frank Thadeusz (18 August 2010). "No Copyright Law: The Real Reason for Germany's Industrial Expansion?". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 11 April 2015. Sigismund Hermbstädt, for example, a chemistry and pharmacy professor in Berlin, who has long since disappeared into the oblivion of history, earned more royalties for his "Principles of Leather Tanning" published in 1806 than British author Mary Shelley did for her horror novel "Frankenstein," which is still famous today.

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Ahmad, Tabrez; Snehil, Soumya (2011). "Significance of Fixation in Copyright Law". SSRN. SSRN 1839527. Archived from the original on 3 June 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
Tobias Kretschmer; Christian Peukert (2014). "Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Digital Music Sales". Cep Discussion Paper. Social Science Electronic Publishing. ISSN 2042-2695. SSRN 2425386.

stanford.edu

fairuse.stanford.edu

Stim, Rich (27 March 2013). "Copyright Basics FAQ". The Center for Internet and Society Fair Use Project. Stanford University. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
Stim, Rich (27 March 2013). "Copyright Ownership: Who Owns What?". The Center for Internet and Society Fair Use Project. Stanford University. Retrieved 21 July 2019.

supremecourt.gov

"11-697 Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2017.

theglobalipcenter.com

"Impacts of Digital Piracy on the U.S. Economy" (PDF). GlobalInnovationPolicyCenter.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2021.

theguardian.com

"Revealed: How copyright law is being misused to remove material from the internet". The Guardian. 23 May 2016. Retrieved 27 February 2021.

tomgpalmer.com

Tom G. Palmer, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified?" Accessed 5 February 2013.

unesco.org

Parties to the Geneva Act of the Universal Copyright Convention Archived 25 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine as of 1 January 2000: the dates given in the document are dates of ratification, not dates of coming into force. The Geneva Act came into force on 16 September 1955, for the first twelve to have ratified (which included four non-members of the Berne Union as required by Art. 9.1), or three months after ratification for other countries.

universityofcalifornia.edu

copyright.universityofcalifornia.edu

uslaw.link

Pub. L. 94–553: Copyright Act of 1976, 90 Stat. 2541, § 401(a) (19 October 1976)
Pub. L. 100–568: The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 (BCIA), 102 Stat. 2853, 2857. One of the changes introduced by the BCIA was to section 401, which governs copyright notices on published copies, specifying that notices "may be placed on" such copies; prior to the BCIA, the statute read that notices "shall be placed on all" such copies. An analogous change was made in section 402, dealing with copyright notices on phonorecords.

web.archive.org

"Definition of copyright". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 29 September 2016. Retrieved 20 December 2018.
"Journal Conventions". Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
Ahmad, Tabrez; Snehil, Soumya (2011). "Significance of Fixation in Copyright Law". SSRN. SSRN 1839527. Archived from the original on 3 June 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
The Italian state of Venetia, adopting Napoleon's law, calls it "diritto d’autore" as part of the "proprietà intellettuale": "la più preziosa e la più sacra delle proprietà" - see: "Governare istruzione e stampa. Le riforme Napoleoniche". 123dok. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023.
Dommerink, Egbert (2004). "Lessen uit de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht" (PDF). University of Amsterdam, Institute for Information Law / Publications. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 August 2023.
"Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Article 5". World Intellectual Property Organization. Archived from the original on 11 September 2012. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
Parties to the Geneva Act of the Universal Copyright Convention Archived 25 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine as of 1 January 2000: the dates given in the document are dates of ratification, not dates of coming into force. The Geneva Act came into force on 16 September 1955, for the first twelve to have ratified (which included four non-members of the Berne Union as required by Art. 9.1), or three months after ratification for other countries.
165 Parties to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine as of May 2012.
"Copyright Registers" Archived 5 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office
"Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Internet: Der bestehende rechtliche Rahmen genügt". Ejpd.admin.ch. Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
See Peter B. Hirtle, "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States 1 January 2015" online at footnote 8 Archived 26 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine
"11-697 Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2017.
"The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 - U.S. Copyright Office Summary" (PDF). Copyright Office. December 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2003. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
"DMCA: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act". American Library Association. Archived from the original on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
"Chapter 1 – Circular 92". U.S. Copyright Office. Archived from the original on 26 August 2024.
"Copyright (Visually Impaired Persons) Act 2002". Royal National Institute of Blind People. 1 January 2011. Archived from the original on 7 September 2009. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
Monastero, Alessia (5 December 2019). "More Than Just a Trend: The Copyright Protection of Fashion Designs". Ontario Bar Association. Archived from the original on 31 August 2023. Retrieved 31 August 2023.

wipo.int

"Understanding Copyright and Related Rights" (PDF). World Intellectual Property Organization. p. 4. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
"Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Article 5". World Intellectual Property Organization. Archived from the original on 11 September 2012. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
World Intellectual Property Organization (2016). Understanding Copyright and Related Rights (PDF). WIPO. p. 8. doi:10.34667/tind.36289. ISBN 9789280528046. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
"World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)" (PDF). 20 April 2019.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Nipps, Karen (2014). "Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662" (PDF). The Library Quarterly. 84 (4): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. ISSN 0024-2519. S2CID 144070638. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
Tobias Kretschmer; Christian Peukert (2014). "Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Digital Music Sales". Cep Discussion Paper. Social Science Electronic Publishing. ISSN 2042-2695. SSRN 2425386.
Nimmer, David (2003). Copyright: Sacred Text, Technology, and the DMCA. Kluwer Law International. p. 63. ISBN 978-90-411-8876-2. OCLC 50606064 – via Google Books.

worldcopyrightlaw.com

"International Copyright Law Survey". Mincov Law Corporation. 13 October 2021.