Copyright notice (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Copyright notice" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
332nd place
246th place
6,605th place
4,226th place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
3,811th place
2,160th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
27th place
51st place

books.google.com

  • Fries, Richard C. (2006). Reliable design of medical devices. CRC Press. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-8247-2375-0. Archived from the original on 2015-01-26.

copyright.gov

  • A useful article is an object that has an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not just for portraying the appearance of the article or for conveying information. See the Copyright Office's definition of useful article here.
  • 37 C.F.R. § 202.2

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

ellenwhite.info

seltzer.org

wendy.seltzer.org

supremecourt.gov

  • As the US Supreme Court has noted, "restored" is a misnomer. "Restored copyrights" include not only copyrights on works that have lapsed and are restored, but also new US copyrights on works that were never covered by copyright, due to failure to meet certain conditions imposed under older US copyright law (such as the notice requirement). Golan v. Holder, 565 U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 873 (2012), at 14 n.13 Archived 2012-01-22 at the Wayback Machine ("Restoration is a misnomer insofar as it implies that all works protected under § 104A previously enjoyed protection. Each work in the public domain because of lack of national eligibility or subject matter protection, and many that failed to comply with formalities, never enjoyed U. S. copyright protection.")

truthorfables.net

web.archive.org

  • Fries, Richard C. (2006). Reliable design of medical devices. CRC Press. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-8247-2375-0. Archived from the original on 2015-01-26.
  • As the US Supreme Court has noted, "restored" is a misnomer. "Restored copyrights" include not only copyrights on works that have lapsed and are restored, but also new US copyrights on works that were never covered by copyright, due to failure to meet certain conditions imposed under older US copyright law (such as the notice requirement). Golan v. Holder, 565 U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 873 (2012), at 14 n.13 Archived 2012-01-22 at the Wayback Machine ("Restoration is a misnomer insofar as it implies that all works protected under § 104A previously enjoyed protection. Each work in the public domain because of lack of national eligibility or subject matter protection, and many that failed to comply with formalities, never enjoyed U. S. copyright protection.")
  • "Second General Revision of U.S. Copyright Law Enacted by the Forty-first Congress on July 8, 1870". 1870-07-08. Archived from the original on November 3, 2013.
  • "The 1874 Amendment to the Copyright Act of 1870 Enacted by the Forty-third Congress on June 18, 1874". 1874-06-18. Archived from the original on November 3, 2013.
  • Wendy's Blog: Legal Tags – My First Youtube: Super Bowl Highlights or Lowlights Archived 2016-03-11 at the Wayback Machine
  • Wendy's Blog: Legal Tags – Foul ball: Baseball's copyright warnings Archived 2011-01-16 at the Wayback Machine

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org