Copyright term (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Copyright term" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
809th place
536th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
1,438th place
877th place
332nd place
246th place
4,084th place
2,686th place
5th place
5th place
2,969th place
1,994th place
254th place
236th place
low place
low place
6,694th place
4,043rd place
1,216th place
797th place
2,187th place
1,500th place
low place
low place
5,701st place
4,384th place
low place
low place
704th place
507th place
179th place
183rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place

asu.edu

homepages.law.asu.edu

becker-posner-blog.com

books.google.com

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

copyright.cornell.edu

doi.org

economist.com

gamasutra.com

  • Gaynor, Steve (February 3, 2014). "Copyright, trademark & money in a creative industry". Gamasutra. There is some argument going on about for how long a copyright holder should be able to charge exclusively for their own work, before it enters the public domain. John Walker argues that perhaps a good cutoff would be 20 years before an 'idea' enters the public domain.

legislation.gov.uk

nber.org

opsi.gov.uk

  • "Amendments of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988". The Duration of Copyright and Rights in Performances Regulations. 1995.

rockpapershotgun.com

rufuspollock.org

  • Pollock, Rufus (October 1, 2007). "Optimal Copyright over Time: Technological Change and the Stock of Works" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 21, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2015. The optimal level for copyright has been a matter for extensive debate over the last decade. Using a parsimonious theoretical model this paper contributes several new results of relevance to this debate. In particular we demonstrate that (a) optimal copyright is likely to fall as the production costs of 'originals' decline (for example as a result of digitization) (b) technological change which reduces costs of production may imply a decrease or a decrease in optimal levels of protection (this contrasts with a large number of commentators, particularly in the copyright industries, who have argued that such change necessitates increases in protection) (c) the optimal level of copyright will, in general, fall over time as the stock of work increases.
  • Pollock, Rufus (June 15, 2009). "Forever minus a day? Calculating optimal copyright term" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2015. The optimal term of copyright has been a matter for extensive debate over the last decade. Based on a novel approach we derive an explicit formula which characterises the optimal term as a function of a few key and, most importantly, empirically-estimable parameters. Using existing data on recordings and books we obtain a point estimate of around 15 years for optimal copyright term with a 99% confidence interval extending up to 38 years. This is substantially shorter than any current copyright term and implies that existing terms are too long.

slashdot.org

games.slashdot.org

stanford.edu

cyberlaw.stanford.edu

sunsteinlaw.com

techdirt.com

thepublicdomain.org

theregister.co.uk

tomwbell.com

web.archive.org

  • "Opposing Copyright Extension" Archived December 24, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Extract from Macaulay, Thomas Babington (1967). Young, G. M. (ed.). Prose and Poetry. Harvard University Press.
  • Pollock, Rufus (October 1, 2007). "Optimal Copyright over Time: Technological Change and the Stock of Works" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 21, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2015. The optimal level for copyright has been a matter for extensive debate over the last decade. Using a parsimonious theoretical model this paper contributes several new results of relevance to this debate. In particular we demonstrate that (a) optimal copyright is likely to fall as the production costs of 'originals' decline (for example as a result of digitization) (b) technological change which reduces costs of production may imply a decrease or a decrease in optimal levels of protection (this contrasts with a large number of commentators, particularly in the copyright industries, who have argued that such change necessitates increases in protection) (c) the optimal level of copyright will, in general, fall over time as the stock of work increases.
  • Pollock, Rufus (June 15, 2009). "Forever minus a day? Calculating optimal copyright term" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 12, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2015. The optimal term of copyright has been a matter for extensive debate over the last decade. Based on a novel approach we derive an explicit formula which characterises the optimal term as a function of a few key and, most importantly, empirically-estimable parameters. Using existing data on recordings and books we obtain a point estimate of around 15 years for optimal copyright term with a 99% confidence interval extending up to 38 years. This is substantially shorter than any current copyright term and implies that existing terms are too long.
  • "Emily Somma v. GOSH [Peter Pan case] Case Page". Stanford Center for Internet and Society. Archived from the original on October 27, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2010.
  • Hirtle, Peter B. (January 1, 2015). "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States". Cornell.edu. Archived from the original on February 26, 2015.

worldcat.org

x.com