Creamy layer (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Creamy layer" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
17th place
15th place
52nd place
35th place
350th place
206th place
low place
7,115th place
low place
6,121st place
low place
8,107th place
138th place
95th place
5th place
5th place
390th place
227th place
979th place
587th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
192nd place
126th place
60th place
43rd place

abplive.com

news.abplive.com

academics-india.com

barandbench.com

business-standard.com

  • "Income ceiling for creamy layer raised to Rs 6 lakh". Business Standard. Press Trust of India. 2013.
  • "Quota: What does 'creamy layer' mean?". Business Standard. 10 April 2008.
  • BS (2008). "SC definition is set to kick up more dust". Business Standard (16 April). Archived from the original (online) on 16 April 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2016. [Subtitle:] But there`s trouble over creamy layer… [Article opening;] What is 'creamy layer'? Introducing the concept in the context of reservation in jobs in 1992, the Supreme Court had said the benefit of reservation should not be given to children of constitutional functionaries such as president, judges of the Supreme Court and high courts, employees of central and state bureaucracies above a certain level, public sector employees, armed forces and paramilitary personnel above the rank of colonel, lawyers, chartered accountants, doctors, financial and management consultants, engineers, film artistes, and authors. Children of those earning Rs. 2.5 lakh ($5,500) per year were also kept out. / In the context of today's judgments, some lawyers believe that according to this definition, the quota go-ahead will not apply to IIMs and AIIMS.

indianexpress.com

indiatimes.com

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

livemint.com

ncbc.nic.in

ndtv.com

news18.com

persmin.gov.in

scobserver.in

thehindu.com

  • Rajagopal, Krishnadas (8 December 2019). "Why does government want Supreme Court to reconsider standing on SC/ST creamy layer?". The Hindu.
  • "OBC creamy layer income limit raised to ₹8 lakh per annum". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 22 September 2017.
  • Venkatesan, J. (2008). "Caste can be the basis to determine backwardness, rules Supreme Court" (online). The Hindu (11 April). Retrieved 26 February 2016. [Subtitle:] OBC should be deemed to mean SEBC after exclusion of creamy layer … [Article opening;] New Delhi: The Supreme Court has held that caste can be the basis for determining Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs) for providing 27 per cent reservation in Central higher educational institutions. / Writing the main judgment, Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan said: 'Though for the purpose of convenience, the list is based on caste, it cannot be said that backward class has been identified solely on the basis of caste. The only possible objection that could be agitated is that in many of the castes included in this list, there may be an affluent section (creamy layer) which cannot be included in the list of SEBCs.' / He added: 'When socially and educationally backward classes are determined by giving importance to caste, it shall not be forgotten that a segment of that caste is economically advanced and they do not require the protection of reservation.'

web.archive.org

  • BS (2008). "SC definition is set to kick up more dust". Business Standard (16 April). Archived from the original (online) on 16 April 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2016. [Subtitle:] But there`s trouble over creamy layer… [Article opening;] What is 'creamy layer'? Introducing the concept in the context of reservation in jobs in 1992, the Supreme Court had said the benefit of reservation should not be given to children of constitutional functionaries such as president, judges of the Supreme Court and high courts, employees of central and state bureaucracies above a certain level, public sector employees, armed forces and paramilitary personnel above the rank of colonel, lawyers, chartered accountants, doctors, financial and management consultants, engineers, film artistes, and authors. Children of those earning Rs. 2.5 lakh ($5,500) per year were also kept out. / In the context of today's judgments, some lawyers believe that according to this definition, the quota go-ahead will not apply to IIMs and AIIMS.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org