Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report" in English language version.
Background support presentation for NASA "Black Carbon and Aerosols" press conference originally associated with Fall AGU, Dec. 14, 2009, and expanded in the public interest.
{{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)and it turns out that our article is the primary published source
This week Hasnain has claimed, for the first time, that he was misquoted by New Scientist in 1999. New Scientist stands by its story and was not the only news outlet to publish Hasnain's claim.
The IPCC based its claim about Dutch vulnerability to rising sea level on data it received from the Netherlands environmental assessment agency PBL. [...]But the Dutch agency now admits it delivered incomplete wording to the panel. "It should have said 55 percent of the Netherlands is vulnerable to floods; 26 percent of the Netherlands is below sea level and another 29 percent can suffer when rivers flood," the PBL said in a statement after the mistake was uncovered by Dutch weekly Vrij Nederland on Wednesday.
In the 2007 IPCC report by the Working group 2 (Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability) a mistake has entered the text that was supplied by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, regarding the risks of flooding for the Netherlands.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help){{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)The IPCC based its claim about Dutch vulnerability to rising sea level on data it received from the Netherlands environmental assessment agency PBL. [...]But the Dutch agency now admits it delivered incomplete wording to the panel. "It should have said 55 percent of the Netherlands is vulnerable to floods; 26 percent of the Netherlands is below sea level and another 29 percent can suffer when rivers flood," the PBL said in a statement after the mistake was uncovered by Dutch weekly Vrij Nederland on Wednesday.
In the 2007 IPCC report by the Working group 2 (Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability) a mistake has entered the text that was supplied by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, regarding the risks of flooding for the Netherlands.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)Deels, zegt woordvoerder Burer ook, is de verwarring te wijten aan verscheidene EU-stukken van Verkeer en Waterstaat waarin getallen als 55 en 60 procent landoppervlak door elkaar worden gebruikt. 'Soms gaat het over overstromingen, soms over de zeespiegel. Dat is waar Parry ook op duidt.'
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Background support presentation for NASA "Black Carbon and Aerosols" press conference originally associated with Fall AGU, Dec. 14, 2009, and expanded in the public interest.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)and it turns out that our article is the primary published source
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help){{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)This week Hasnain has claimed, for the first time, that he was misquoted by New Scientist in 1999. New Scientist stands by its story and was not the only news outlet to publish Hasnain's claim.
The IPCC based its claim about Dutch vulnerability to rising sea level on data it received from the Netherlands environmental assessment agency PBL. [...]But the Dutch agency now admits it delivered incomplete wording to the panel. "It should have said 55 percent of the Netherlands is vulnerable to floods; 26 percent of the Netherlands is below sea level and another 29 percent can suffer when rivers flood," the PBL said in a statement after the mistake was uncovered by Dutch weekly Vrij Nederland on Wednesday.
In the 2007 IPCC report by the Working group 2 (Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability) a mistake has entered the text that was supplied by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, regarding the risks of flooding for the Netherlands.
Deels, zegt woordvoerder Burer ook, is de verwarring te wijten aan verscheidene EU-stukken van Verkeer en Waterstaat waarin getallen als 55 en 60 procent landoppervlak door elkaar worden gebruikt. 'Soms gaat het over overstromingen, soms over de zeespiegel. Dat is waar Parry ook op duidt.'
{{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)