Daubert standard (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Daubert standard" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

8nih.gov

4^th place

7doi.org

2^nd place

3cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

3handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

2canlii.org

6,607^th place

3,855^th place

1yale.edu

565^th place

460^th place

1courtlistener.com

5,477^th place

3,008^th place

1thomsonreuters.com

8,026^th place

5,039^th place

1law.com

3,163^rd place

1,731^st place

1natlawreview.com

9,177^th place

5,024^th place

1mdcourts.gov

low place

1rand.org

2,921^st place

2,118^th place

1jaapl.org

8,749^th place

6,545^th place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1zenodo.org

621^st place

380^th place

1parliament.uk

367^th place

243^rd place

1lawcom.gov.uk

low place

1nationalarchives.gov.uk

744^th place

547^th place

canlii.org

R. v. J.-L.J., 2 SCR 600 (Supreme Court of Canada 2000).
White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co. [2015] 2 SCR 182.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)". law.cornell.edu.
"Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses". Federal Rules of Evidence – via Cornell Law School.
See (c) of the syllabus of the Daubert case.

courtlistener.com

"In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994)". CourtListener.com.

doi.org

Berger, Margaret A. (2005). "What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S59–65. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. PMID 16030340.
Neufeld, P. (2005). "The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S107 – S113. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333. PMID 16030325. S2CID 45496524.
Gatowski, S. I.; et al. (2001). "Asking the gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert world". Law and Human Behavior. 25 (5): 433–458. doi:10.1023/A:1012899030937. PMID 11688367. S2CID 30746470.
Rothman, K. J.; Greenland, S. (2005). "Causation and Causal Inference in Epidemiology". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S144 – S150. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. PMID 16030331.
Melnick, R. (2005). "A Daubert Motion: A Legal Strategy to Exclude Essential Scientific Evidence in Toxic Tort Litigation". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S30 – S34. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.046250. PMID 16030335.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). "Law's Knowledge: Science for Justice in Legal Settings". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S49 – S58. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. PMID 16030338.
Tancredi, Laurence R. & Giannini, A. James (December 1994). "The admissibility of scientific evidence in psychiatric malpractice: junk science and the Daubert case". Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine. 1 (3): 145–148. doi:10.1016/1353-1131(94)90082-5. PMID 16371283.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Berger, Margaret A. (2005). "What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S59–65. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. PMID 16030340.
Rothman, K. J.; Greenland, S. (2005). "Causation and Causal Inference in Epidemiology". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S144 – S150. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. PMID 16030331.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). "Law's Knowledge: Science for Justice in Legal Settings". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S49 – S58. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. PMID 16030338.

jaapl.org

Gutheil, Thomas G.; Bursztajn, Harold J. (1 June 2005). "Attorney Abuses of Daubert Hearings: Junk Science, Junk Law, or Just Plain Obstruction?". Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 33 (2): 150–152. PMID 15985655.

law.com

Lean, Raychel (May 23, 2019). "'Daubert' Evidence Standard Takes Immediate Effect in Florida After High Court Turnaround". Law.com.

lawcom.gov.uk

"The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales". Archived 2009-12-12 at the UK Government Web Archive (PDF). The Law Commission.

mdcourts.gov

Rochkind v. Stevenson, 471 Md. 1 (2020), https://www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2020/47a19.pdf

nationalarchives.gov.uk

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

"The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales". Archived 2009-12-12 at the UK Government Web Archive (PDF). The Law Commission.

natlawreview.com

McDonough, Sean M.; Duerden, Angela M. (June 5, 2019). "The Daubert Standard Once Again Controls in Florida State Court". The National Law Review.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Berger, Margaret A. (2005). "What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S59–65. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044701. PMID 16030340.
Gutheil, Thomas G.; Bursztajn, Harold J. (1 June 2005). "Attorney Abuses of Daubert Hearings: Junk Science, Junk Law, or Just Plain Obstruction?". Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 33 (2): 150–152. PMID 15985655.
Neufeld, P. (2005). "The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S107 – S113. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333. PMID 16030325. S2CID 45496524.
Gatowski, S. I.; et al. (2001). "Asking the gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert world". Law and Human Behavior. 25 (5): 433–458. doi:10.1023/A:1012899030937. PMID 11688367. S2CID 30746470.
Rothman, K. J.; Greenland, S. (2005). "Causation and Causal Inference in Epidemiology". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S144 – S150. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204. PMID 16030331.
Melnick, R. (2005). "A Daubert Motion: A Legal Strategy to Exclude Essential Scientific Evidence in Toxic Tort Litigation". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S30 – S34. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.046250. PMID 16030335.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). "Law's Knowledge: Science for Justice in Legal Settings". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S49 – S58. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. hdl:10.2105/AJPH.2004.045732. PMID 16030338.
Tancredi, Laurence R. & Giannini, A. James (December 1994). "The admissibility of scientific evidence in psychiatric malpractice: junk science and the Daubert case". Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine. 1 (3): 145–148. doi:10.1016/1353-1131(94)90082-5. PMID 16371283.

parliament.uk

publications.parliament.uk

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2005) Forensic Science on Trial. London: The Stationery Office Limited, HC96-I, para.173

rand.org

Dixon, Lloyd, and Gill, Brian. "Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision". Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation, 2001.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Neufeld, P. (2005). "The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S107 – S113. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333. PMID 16030325. S2CID 45496524.
Gatowski, S. I.; et al. (2001). "Asking the gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert world". Law and Human Behavior. 25 (5): 433–458. doi:10.1023/A:1012899030937. PMID 11688367. S2CID 30746470.

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Bernstein, David E. (2007). "Expert Witnesses, Adversarial Bias, and the (Partial) Failure of the Daubert Revolution". Iowa Law Review. SSRN 963461.

thomsonreuters.com

newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com

Reuters

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Owen, D. G. (2002). "A Decade of Daubert". Denver University Law Review. 80: 345. ISSN 0883-9409.
Risinger, D. Michael (2000). "Navigating Expert Reliability: Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock?". Albany Law Review. 64: 99. ISSN 0002-4678.

yale.edu

documents.law.yale.edu

"Pronouncing Dictionary of the Supreme Court of the United States". Documents Collection Center. Yale University. Retrieved 2022-12-05.

zenodo.org

Melnick, R. (2005). "A Daubert Motion: A Legal Strategy to Exclude Essential Scientific Evidence in Toxic Tort Litigation". American Journal of Public Health. 95 (S1): S30 – S34. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.046250. PMID 16030335.