The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, Giampiero (2011). "Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente". Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, Giampiero (2011). "Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente". Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2016.