David Chaytor (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "David Chaytor" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

11web.archive.org

1^st place

7bbc.co.uk

8^th place

10^th place

2telegraph.co.uk

30^th place

24^th place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

11^th place

1mancat.ac.uk

low place

1parliament.uk

367^th place

243^rd place

1comprehensivefuture.org.uk

low place

1scotsman.com

413^th place

261^st place

1questia.com

1,201^st place

770^th place

1manchestereveningnews.co.uk

675^th place

416^th place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

Mp, Labour (21 October 2002). "David Chaytor". BBC News. Archived from the original on 3 July 2004. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
"Labour MP suspended over expenses". BBC News. 16 May 2009. Archived from the original on 18 May 2009. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
"Labour MP Chaytor to stand down". BBC News. 2 June 2009. Archived from the original on 5 June 2009. Retrieved 2 June 2009.
"Three MPs and one peer to be charged over expenses". BBC News. 5 February 2010. Retrieved 5 February 2010.

bbc.co.uk

"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor pleads guilty to charges". BBC News. 3 December 2010. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claims". BBC News. 7 January 2011. Archived from the original on 7 January 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor to challenge sentence". BBC News. 23 February 2011. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 20 June 2018.

comprehensivefuture.org.uk

[2] Archived 11 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine

mancat.ac.uk

[1] Archived 19 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine

manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Williams, Jennifer (12 February 2014). "Hidden Agenda: Where are they now? David Chaytor". Manchester Evening News. Retrieved 2 July 2020.

parliament.uk

publications.parliament.uk

"House of Commons Hansard Debates for 17 Jun 1997 (pt 13)". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 28 October 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2009.

questia.com

The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, Giampiero (2011). "Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente". Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2016.

scotsman.com

news.scotsman.com

"Four in court over expenses". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. 28 May 2010.

telegraph.co.uk

Ward, Victoria (7 January 2010). "David Chaytor, the former lecturer who fell foul of the expenses system". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
[3]^{[dead link]}

theguardian.com

"David Chaytor: Electoral history and profile". The Guardian. London.

web.archive.org

Mp, Labour (21 October 2002). "David Chaytor". BBC News. Archived from the original on 3 July 2004. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
"Labour MP suspended over expenses". BBC News. 16 May 2009. Archived from the original on 18 May 2009. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
"Labour MP Chaytor to stand down". BBC News. 2 June 2009. Archived from the original on 5 June 2009. Retrieved 2 June 2009.
[1] Archived 19 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
Ward, Victoria (7 January 2010). "David Chaytor, the former lecturer who fell foul of the expenses system". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
"House of Commons Hansard Debates for 17 Jun 1997 (pt 13)". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 28 October 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
[2] Archived 11 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, Giampiero (2011). "Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente". Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor pleads guilty to charges". BBC News. 3 December 2010. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claims". BBC News. 7 January 2011. Archived from the original on 7 January 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
"MPs' expenses: David Chaytor to challenge sentence". BBC News. 23 February 2011. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 20 June 2018.