Debate on traditional and simplified Chinese characters (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Debate on traditional and simplified Chinese characters" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

15web.archive.org

1^st place

3xinhuanet.com

309^th place

660^th place

2archive.today

14^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

2archive.org

6^th place

2etaiwannews.com

low place

2sina.com.cn

144^th place

497^th place

2taipei.gov.tw

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

1zdic.net

6,519^th place

low place

1doi.org

2^nd place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

1edu.cn

low place

1xys.org

low place

1straitstimes.com

543^rd place

346^th place

1cqvip.com

5,710^th place

low place

1geocities.com

1,151^st place

930^th place

1china-language.gov.cn

low place

1hdpark.net

low place

1pinyin.info

low place

9,953^rd place

1chinaheritagequarterly.org

low place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

520^th place

1chicagomaroon.com

low place

1shanghaidaily.com

low place

1chinadaily.com.cn

831^st place

730^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

1roc-taiwan.org

low place

1chinapost.com.tw

6,266^th place

4,133^rd place

1ccamuseum.org

low place

1gwytb.gov.cn

low place

1163.com

372^nd place

942^nd place

15s5w.com

low place

1taipeitimes.com

1,398^th place

881^st place

1youth.cn

4,810^th place

low place

1china.org.cn

1,653^rd place

1,397^th place

1southcn.com

4,939^th place

low place

1chinanews.com.cn

2,979^th place

low place

1people.com.cn

351^st place

1,081^st place

1chinatimes.com

440^th place

5,818^th place

1moe.gov.cn

7,655^th place

9,705^th place

163.com

news.163.com

"宋祖英等联名提议:小学应增加繁体字教育". NetEase. 2008-03-13. Archived from the original on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

5s5w.com

news.5s5w.com

"Archived copy". news.5s5w.com. Archived from the original on 21 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

archive.org

Street, Brian V.; Regie Stites (2001). Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge. pp. 171–187. ISBN 978-0-415-23451-1.
Kaplan, Robert; Baldauf, Richard (2008). Language Planning and Policy in Asia. Multilingual Matters. pp. 69, 71, 74.

archive.today

"演講紀錄". Theme.taipei.gov.tw. 2005-03-31. Archived from the original on 2012-07-14. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"專家：恢復繁體字不可取建議"識繁用簡"". 中新網. 2009-04-09. Archived from the original on 2012-07-11. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

books.google.com

Xing, Janet Zhiqun (2006). Teaching and Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Pedagogical Grammar. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 31–32, 105, 323. ISBN 978-962-209-763-6.

ccamuseum.org

Rohsenow, John S. "Chinese Language Use in Chicagoland" from Ethnolinguistic Chicago: Language and Literacy in the City's Neighborhoods. (2003). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-8058-4345-0. p. 338.

chicagomaroon.com

Smith, Arieh. "Reflections on China: The folly of simplified characters". The Chicago Maroon. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2011.

china-language.gov.cn

"汉字规范的换位思考". 中国语言文字网. 2005-07-08. Archived from the original on 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

china.org.cn

Zhang, Jessica (12 March 2009). "Heated debate on abolishing simplified Chinese character". Retrieved 28 January 2014.

chinadaily.com.cn

Zhou, Raymond (2008-03-22). "'Jianti' and 'fanti' are equally good". China Daily. Retrieved 2012-03-04.

chinaheritagequarterly.org

"The Chinese Character—no simple matter". China Heritage Quarterly. Australian National University. Retrieved 2012-03-02.

chinanews.com.cn

big5.chinanews.com.cn

"專家：恢復繁體字不可取建議"識繁用簡"". 中新網. 2009-04-09. Archived from the original on 2012-07-11. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

chinapost.com.tw

"Ma correct to advocate use of traditional Chinese characters". The China Post. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

chinatimes.com

中時新聞網. "繁體識讀提案陸教部：依法用簡體 - 兩岸新聞". 中時新聞網 (in Chinese). Retrieved 2022-03-25.

cqvip.com

佟乐泉; 宋钧 (1987). "汉字的学习和跨文化研究". 语文建设 (2): 2.

doi.org

Aldrich, John (1995), "Correlations Genuine and Spurious in Pearson and Yule", Statistical Science, 10 (4): 364–376, doi:10.1214/ss/1177009870, JSTOR 2246135

edu.cn

"语言学家周有光记者见面会实录--中国教育". 2016-09-10. Archived from the original on 2016-09-10. Retrieved 2020-08-14.

etaiwannews.com

"Taiwan promotes traditional Chinese characters". Etaiwannews.com. 2009-01-01. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"Cross-strait cooperation may help Chinese become world heritage". Etaiwannews.com. 2008-12-30. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

geocities.com

Varadi, Joe. "Simplified Chinese?". Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved 2 July 2011.

gwytb.gov.cn

Taiwan affairs office under PRC. "Gwytb.gov.cn Archived 2009-02-20 at the Wayback Machine." Mainland literature embraced in Taiwan. Retrieved on 2009-01-12.

hdpark.net

"专家称国家将出新规范汉字表改进部分简化字_海德公园". 20 June 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2018.

jstor.org

Aldrich, John (1995), "Correlations Genuine and Spurious in Pearson and Yule", Statistical Science, 10 (4): 364–376, doi:10.1214/ss/1177009870, JSTOR 2246135

moe.gov.cn

"关于政协十三届全国委员会第二次会议第1478号（教育类177号）提案答复的函 - 中华人民共和国教育部政府门户网站". www.moe.gov.cn. Retrieved 2022-03-25.

nytimes.com

roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com

Chao, Eileen; Wang, Eugene; Hsuan, Meng; Matloff, Norman (2 May 2009). "The Chinese Language, Ever Evolving". Room for Debate. The New York Times.

people.com.cn

npc.people.com.cn

"人大代表吴仕民：恢复繁体字传承传统文化--中国人大新闻--人民网". npc.people.com.cn. Retrieved 2022-03-25.

pinyin.info

Mair, Victor (2006-12-13). "Simplified characters inside and outside of the People's Republic of China". Pinyin News. Retrieved 2012-03-02.

roc-taiwan.org

"ROC to use traditional Chinese characters for official documents, websites". Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Los Angeles. 2011-06-16. Archived from the original on 2014-02-21. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

shanghaidaily.com

[2]Archived March 30, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

sina.com.cn

blog.sina.com.cn

Wang Gan, 2008-03-02, 五十年内，废除简化字如何
"王干：汉字推广应该择优而不是就简_博客_新浪网". 2008-04-07. Archived from the original on 7 April 2008. Retrieved 2022-03-25.

southcn.com

news.southcn.com

"新规范汉字表即将公布改进部分简化字社会民生南方网". Archived from the original on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2009-05-03.

straitstimes.com

Hong, Jose (2017-07-11). "Speak Mandarin Campaign apologises for using wrong Chinese character". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2023-11-16.

taipei.gov.tw

theme.taipei.gov.tw

"演講紀錄". Theme.taipei.gov.tw. 2005-03-31. Archived from the original on 2012-07-14. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

taipei.gov.tw

Advantages and Disadvantages on Traditional Characters vs Simplified Characters, 2002, published by Government of City of Taipei, Republic of China [1] In point 3, it reads "Traditional characters is aesthetically pleasing, and therefore it is widely used by people who practice Chinese calligraphy throughout the world including countries such as Japan, Korea as well as mainland China. It is because traditional characters is able to express the artistic essence of calligraphy."

taipeitimes.com

Taipei Times – Thousands gather to set record (2 Jan 2009)

upenn.edu

itre.cis.upenn.edu

Poser, Bill (2007-01-03). "Notes on Chinese Character Simplification". Language Log. Retrieved 2012-03-02.

web.archive.org

"语言学家周有光记者见面会实录--中国教育". 2016-09-10. Archived from the original on 2016-09-10. Retrieved 2020-08-14.
Varadi, Joe. "Simplified Chinese?". Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved 2 July 2011.
"汉字规范的换位思考". 中国语言文字网. 2005-07-08. Archived from the original on 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"专家称国家将出新规范汉字表改进部分简化字_海德公园". 20 June 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
Smith, Arieh. "Reflections on China: The folly of simplified characters". The Chicago Maroon. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2011.
[2]Archived March 30, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
"ROC to use traditional Chinese characters for official documents, websites". Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Los Angeles. 2011-06-16. Archived from the original on 2014-02-21. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
Taiwan affairs office under PRC. "Gwytb.gov.cn Archived 2009-02-20 at the Wayback Machine." Mainland literature embraced in Taiwan. Retrieved on 2009-01-12.
"韓國媒體報道有誤中日韓並無協議統一漢字". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"王干：汉字推广应该择优而不是就简_博客_新浪网". 2008-04-07. Archived from the original on 7 April 2008. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
"宋祖英等联名提议:小学应增加繁体字教育". NetEase. 2008-03-13. Archived from the original on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"教育部部长周济表示不考虑"小学增设繁体字教育"". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on March 19, 2008. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"马英九：台湾不会改简体字但会用繁、简对照". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on July 9, 2008. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"Archived copy". news.5s5w.com. Archived from the original on 21 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
"新规范汉字表即将公布改进部分简化字社会民生南方网". Archived from the original on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2009-05-03.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Yen, Yuehping, 1969- (2004). Calligraphy and power in contemporary Chinese society (1st ed.). New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 0-203-59060-0. OCLC 252904759.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
Hong, Jose (2017-07-11). "Speak Mandarin Campaign apologises for using wrong Chinese character". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2023-11-16.

xinhuanet.com

news.xinhuanet.com

"教育部部长周济表示不考虑"小学增设繁体字教育"". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on March 19, 2008. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
"马英九：台湾不会改简体字但会用繁、简对照". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on July 9, 2008. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

big5.xinhuanet.com

"韓國媒體報道有誤中日韓並無協議統一漢字". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

xys.org

方舟子. "简体字引起混乱吗？" (TXT). Xys.org. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

youth.cn

zhuanti.youth.cn

jlee (2009-03-10). "台籍代表：建议两岸联手为中文繁体字"申遗"". Zhuanti.youth.cn. Retrieved 2014-02-09.

zdic.net

"Shuowen Jiezi "聖"". Zdic.net. Retrieved 28 January 2018.