"The popular belief that Copernicus's heliocentric system constitutes a significant simplification of the Ptolemaic system is obviously wrong ... [T]he Copernican models themselves require about twice as many circles as the Ptolemaic models and are far less elegant and adaptable." Neugebauer, Otto (1969) [1957]. The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (2 ed.). Dover Publications. ISBN978-0-486-22332-2., p. 204. This is an extreme estimate in favor of Ptolemy.
Duhem, Pierre (1969). To save the phenomena, an essay on the idea of physical theory from Plato to Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC681213472. (excerpt).
Palter, Robert (1970). "Approach to the History of Astronomy". Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 1: 94. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(70)90001-4.
Goldstein, Bernard R. (1972). "Theory and Observation in Medieval Astronomy". Isis. 63 (1): 39–47 [40–41]. doi:10.1086/350839. S2CID120700705.
Diogenes Laertius (September 2013). The lives and opinions of eminent philosophers. General Books. ISBN978-1-230-21699-7. OCLC881385989.
Pedersen, Olaf (1993). Early physics and astronomy: a historical introduction (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-40340-5. OCLC24173447.
Duhem, Pierre (1969). To save the phenomena, an essay on the idea of physical theory from Plato to Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC681213472. (excerpt).
Repcheck, Jack (2008). Copernicus' secret: how the scientific revolution began. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. ISBN978-0-7432-8952-8. OCLC209693599.