Desmond Swayne (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Desmond Swayne" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
200th place
141st place
5,435th place
2,819th place
30th place
24th place
8th place
10th place
12th place
11th place
367th place
243rd place
5th place
5th place
36th place
33rd place
431st place
274th place
1,842nd place
1,079th place
9th place
13th place
32nd place
21st place
4,669th place
2,601st place
low place
low place
1,450th place
814th place
2nd place
2nd place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
low place
8,879th place
241st place
193rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,586th place
4,493rd place
6,770th place
3,990th place
117th place
145th place
low place
low place
238th place
159th place
706th place
437th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,084th place
617th place
1,811th place
1,036th place
7,223rd place
4,003rd place
low place
low place

advertiserandtimes.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

  • "Desmond Swayne". BBC News. 17 October 2002. Retrieved 14 July 2010.
  • "MP to serve in Iraq". BBC News. 19 June 2003. Retrieved 5 August 2014.

books.google.com

channel4.com

christiansinparliament.org.uk

dailyecho.co.uk

desmondswaynemp.com

doi.org

electoralcalculus.co.uk

ghostarchive.org

gtmediawatch.org

helensburghadvertiser.co.uk

independent.co.uk

independent.gov.uk

privycouncil.independent.gov.uk

inews.co.uk

leavemeansleave.eu

msn.com

number10.gov.uk

parliament.uk

hansard.parliament.uk

  • Swayne, Sir Desmond (13 October 2020), "Business of the House - Hansard", Hansard, volume 682; column 513, retrieved 17 October 2020, Can we have a debate on censorship? Then we would be able to discuss the sinister disappearance of the link from Google to the Great Barrington declaration, couldn't we?
  • Rees-Mogg, Jacob (13 October 2020), "Business of the House - Hansard", Hansard, volume 682; column 513, retrieved 17 October 2020, My right hon. Friend is absolutely right to raise the question of censorship. The Government are sceptical about the Barrington declaration, but that does not mean that people should not be free to discuss it, and it is a worrying trend for large internet operators to think that they should be the arbiters of free speech. It is not for them to arbitrate over free speech. It is perhaps even more troubling that they are sometimes slow to take down material that could damage children, but they are not so slow to take down things that they do not agree with politically, and that raises important questions.

parliament.uk

politicsresources.net

sky.com

news.sky.com

spectator.co.uk

standard.co.uk

telegraph.co.uk

telegraph.co.uk

ukpolitics.telegraph.co.uk

parliament.telegraph.co.uk

thegazette.co.uk

theguardian.com

thejc.com

theyworkforyou.com

thisisdorset.net

thisishampshire.net

timesonline.co.uk

ukwhoswho.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

youtube.com