Dialogical logic (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dialogical logic" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

9doi.org

2^nd place

6semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

2archives-ouvertes.fr

1,031^st place

879^th place

1utm.edu

1,379^th place

1,175^th place

1rug.nl

2,779^th place

1,997^th place

1stanford.edu

179^th place

183^rd place

1academia.edu

121^st place

142^nd place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

1ugent.be

3,695^th place

3,560^th place

academia.edu

univ-lille3.academia.edu

Rahman, Shahid (2018). "Shahid Rahman Curriculum Vitae". Retrieved 17 June 2019.

archives-ouvertes.fr

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

Crubellier, M.; Marion, M.; McConaughey, Z.; Rahman, S. (2019). "Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis". History and Philosophy of Logic. 40 (3): 207–233. doi:10.1080/01445340.2019.1586623. hdl:20.500.12210/73764. S2CID 125413771.
Rahman, S.; Granström, J.; Salloum, Z. (2014). "Ibn Sina's Approach to equality and unity" (PDF). Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 4 (2): 297–307. doi:10.1017/S0957423914000046. S2CID 121441717.

doi.org

Notice that since according to the intuitionistic rule RS2i, players can only defend the last open attack, no restriction on defences are necessary. Felscher (1985) and Piecha (2015) after him, did not restrict the number of attacks. This triggers infinite plays. Restrictions on the number of attacks and defences are known as repetitionranks. The most through study of repetition ranks has been developed by Clerbout (2014). Felscher, W. (1985). "Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logic". Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 28: 217–254. doi:10.1016/0168-0072(85)90016-8. ISSN 0168-0072. Piecha, T. (2015). "Dialogical Logic". The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Clerbout, N. (2014). La sémantique dialogique. Notions fondamentales et éléments de metathéorie. Cahiers de Logique et d'Epistemologie. Vol. 21. London: College Publications. ISBN 978-1-84890-153-7.
This has been also studied in the context of cooperative dialogues for the search of structural rules; see Keiff (2007).^{[full citation needed]} These results seems to have been unnoticed in Dutilh Novaes & French (2018). Dutilh Novaes, C.; French, R. (2018). "Paradoxes and structural rules from a dialogical perspective". Philosophical Issues. 28 (1): 129–158. doi:10.1111/phis.12119. ISSN 1758-2237.
These publications respond to old and new criticism to dialogic logic such as the ones of Dutilh Novaes (2015) and Hodges (2001). Dutilh Novaes, C. (2015). "A Dialogical, Multiagent Account of the Normativity of Logic". Dialectica. 69 (4): 587–609. doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12118. ISSN 1746-8361. Hodges, W. (2001). "Dialogue foundations: A sceptical look". Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 75 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00076.
Rahman, S.; Clerbout, N.; Gorisse, M.H. (2011). "Context Sensitivity in Jain Philosophy. A Dialogical Study of Siddharsigani's Commentary on the Handbook of Logic". Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40 (5): 633–662. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9164-0. hdl:1854/LU-4264208. S2CID 2034776.
For example:
- Rahman, S.; Carnielli, W.; Rückert, H. (2001). "The Dialogical Approach to Paraconsistency". Synthese. 125 (1–2): 201–232. doi:10.1023/A:1005294523930. S2CID 16215985.
- Rahman, S.; Rückert, H. (2001). "Dialogical Connexive Logic". Synthese. 125 (1–2): 105–139. doi:10.1023/A:1010351931769. S2CID 207637306.
- Crubellier, M.; Marion, M.; McConaughey, Z.; Rahman, S. (2019). "Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis". History and Philosophy of Logic. 40 (3): 207–233. doi:10.1080/01445340.2019.1586623. hdl:20.500.12210/73764. S2CID 125413771.
- Rahman, S.; Granström, J.; Salloum, Z. (2014). "Ibn Sina's Approach to equality and unity" (PDF). Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 4 (2): 297–307. doi:10.1017/S0957423914000046. S2CID 121441717.
- Rahman, S.; Muhammad, I. (2018). "Unfolding parallel reasoning in islamic jurisprudence. Epistemic and Dialectical Meaning within Abū Isḥāq al-Shīrāzī's System of Co-Relational Inferences of the Occasioning Factor". Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 28: 67–132. doi:10.1017/S0957423917000091. S2CID 171240078.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Rahman, S.; Clerbout, N.; Gorisse, M.H. (2011). "Context Sensitivity in Jain Philosophy. A Dialogical Study of Siddharsigani's Commentary on the Handbook of Logic". Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40 (5): 633–662. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9164-0. hdl:1854/LU-4264208. S2CID 2034776.
Crubellier, M.; Marion, M.; McConaughey, Z.; Rahman, S. (2019). "Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis". History and Philosophy of Logic. 40 (3): 207–233. doi:10.1080/01445340.2019.1586623. hdl:20.500.12210/73764. S2CID 125413771.

jstor.org

Rahman, S.; Rückert, H. (1999). "Dialogische Modallogik (für T, B, S4, und S5)". Logique et Analyse. 42 (167/168): 243–282. JSTOR 44084659.

rug.nl

research.rug.nl

These publications respond to old and new criticism to dialogic logic such as the ones of Dutilh Novaes (2015) and Hodges (2001). Dutilh Novaes, C. (2015). "A Dialogical, Multiagent Account of the Normativity of Logic". Dialectica. 69 (4): 587–609. doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12118. ISSN 1746-8361. Hodges, W. (2001). "Dialogue foundations: A sceptical look". Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 75 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00076.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Rahman, S.; Clerbout, N.; Gorisse, M.H. (2011). "Context Sensitivity in Jain Philosophy. A Dialogical Study of Siddharsigani's Commentary on the Handbook of Logic". Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40 (5): 633–662. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9164-0. hdl:1854/LU-4264208. S2CID 2034776.
For example:
- Rahman, S.; Carnielli, W.; Rückert, H. (2001). "The Dialogical Approach to Paraconsistency". Synthese. 125 (1–2): 201–232. doi:10.1023/A:1005294523930. S2CID 16215985.
- Rahman, S.; Rückert, H. (2001). "Dialogical Connexive Logic". Synthese. 125 (1–2): 105–139. doi:10.1023/A:1010351931769. S2CID 207637306.
- Crubellier, M.; Marion, M.; McConaughey, Z.; Rahman, S. (2019). "Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis". History and Philosophy of Logic. 40 (3): 207–233. doi:10.1080/01445340.2019.1586623. hdl:20.500.12210/73764. S2CID 125413771.
- Rahman, S.; Granström, J.; Salloum, Z. (2014). "Ibn Sina's Approach to equality and unity" (PDF). Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 4 (2): 297–307. doi:10.1017/S0957423914000046. S2CID 121441717.
- Rahman, S.; Muhammad, I. (2018). "Unfolding parallel reasoning in islamic jurisprudence. Epistemic and Dialectical Meaning within Abū Isḥāq al-Shīrāzī's System of Co-Relational Inferences of the Occasioning Factor". Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 28: 67–132. doi:10.1017/S0957423917000091. S2CID 171240078.

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Clerbout, Nicolas; McConaughey, Zoe (2022), "Dialogical Logic", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2022-02-19

ugent.be

biblio.ugent.be

Rahman, S.; Clerbout, N.; Gorisse, M.H. (2011). "Context Sensitivity in Jain Philosophy. A Dialogical Study of Siddharsigani's Commentary on the Handbook of Logic". Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40 (5): 633–662. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9164-0. hdl:1854/LU-4264208. S2CID 2034776.

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

Notice that since according to the intuitionistic rule RS2i, players can only defend the last open attack, no restriction on defences are necessary. Felscher (1985) and Piecha (2015) after him, did not restrict the number of attacks. This triggers infinite plays. Restrictions on the number of attacks and defences are known as repetitionranks. The most through study of repetition ranks has been developed by Clerbout (2014). Felscher, W. (1985). "Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logic". Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 28: 217–254. doi:10.1016/0168-0072(85)90016-8. ISSN 0168-0072. Piecha, T. (2015). "Dialogical Logic". The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Clerbout, N. (2014). La sémantique dialogique. Notions fondamentales et éléments de metathéorie. Cahiers de Logique et d'Epistemologie. Vol. 21. London: College Publications. ISBN 978-1-84890-153-7.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Notice that since according to the intuitionistic rule RS2i, players can only defend the last open attack, no restriction on defences are necessary. Felscher (1985) and Piecha (2015) after him, did not restrict the number of attacks. This triggers infinite plays. Restrictions on the number of attacks and defences are known as repetitionranks. The most through study of repetition ranks has been developed by Clerbout (2014). Felscher, W. (1985). "Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logic". Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 28: 217–254. doi:10.1016/0168-0072(85)90016-8. ISSN 0168-0072. Piecha, T. (2015). "Dialogical Logic". The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Clerbout, N. (2014). La sémantique dialogique. Notions fondamentales et éléments de metathéorie. Cahiers de Logique et d'Epistemologie. Vol. 21. London: College Publications. ISBN 978-1-84890-153-7.
This has been also studied in the context of cooperative dialogues for the search of structural rules; see Keiff (2007).^{[full citation needed]} These results seems to have been unnoticed in Dutilh Novaes & French (2018). Dutilh Novaes, C.; French, R. (2018). "Paradoxes and structural rules from a dialogical perspective". Philosophical Issues. 28 (1): 129–158. doi:10.1111/phis.12119. ISSN 1758-2237.
These publications respond to old and new criticism to dialogic logic such as the ones of Dutilh Novaes (2015) and Hodges (2001). Dutilh Novaes, C. (2015). "A Dialogical, Multiagent Account of the Normativity of Logic". Dialectica. 69 (4): 587–609. doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12118. ISSN 1746-8361. Hodges, W. (2001). "Dialogue foundations: A sceptical look". Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 75 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00076.