Digital infinity (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Digital infinity" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
15th place
8th place
low place
low place
4th place
4th place

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

radicalanthropologygroup.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Knight, Chris (2004). "Decoding Chomsky" (PDF). European Review. 12 (4). London, UK: Academia Europaea: 581–603. doi:10.1017/S1062798704000493. S2CID 232176025. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2020. For Chomsky, the only channels of communication that are free from such ideological contamination are those of genuine natural science.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Knight, Chris (2004). "Decoding Chomsky" (PDF). European Review. 12 (4). London, UK: Academia Europaea: 581–603. doi:10.1017/S1062798704000493. S2CID 232176025. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2020. For Chomsky, the only channels of communication that are free from such ideological contamination are those of genuine natural science.

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

  • Knight, Chris (2004). "Decoding Chomsky" (PDF). European Review. 12 (4). London, UK: Academia Europaea: 581–603. doi:10.1017/S1062798704000493. S2CID 232176025. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2020. For Chomsky, the only channels of communication that are free from such ideological contamination are those of genuine natural science.

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Leech, Geoffrey Neil (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman Linguistics Library. London: Longman. p. 250. ISBN 0582551102. OCLC 751316590. It has the advantage of maintaining the integrity of linguistics, as within a walled city, away from the contaminating influences of use and context. But many have grave doubts about the narrowness of this paradigm's definition of language, and about the high degree of abstraction and idealization of data which it requires.