Dodo bird verdict (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dodo bird verdict" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
11th place
8th place
207th place
136th place
3rd place
3rd place
5th place
5th place
low place
9,942nd place
low place
low place

books.google.com

  • McAleavey, Andrew A.; Castonguay, Louis G (2015). "The Process of Change in Psychotherapy: Common and Unique Factors". In Gelo, Omar CG; Pritz, Alfred; Rieken, Bernd (eds.). Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. New York: Springer. pp. 293–310 [294]. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_15. ISBN 9783709113813. OCLC 900722269. Though many authors view outcome equivalence as the main reason to study common factors in psychotherapy, we cheerfully disagree. Regardless of outcome, it is noncontroversial to say that psychotherapies of many origins share several features of process and content, and it follows that better understanding the patterns of these commonalities may be an important part of better understanding the effects of psychotherapies. That is, irrespective of whether some psychotherapies are equivalent to others in symptomatic outcome, understanding what part of clients' improvement is due to factors that are shared by several approaches appears to us to be a conceptually and clinically important question.

doi.org

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

psychologicalscience.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

srmhp.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • McAleavey, Andrew A.; Castonguay, Louis G (2015). "The Process of Change in Psychotherapy: Common and Unique Factors". In Gelo, Omar CG; Pritz, Alfred; Rieken, Bernd (eds.). Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. New York: Springer. pp. 293–310 [294]. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_15. ISBN 9783709113813. OCLC 900722269. Though many authors view outcome equivalence as the main reason to study common factors in psychotherapy, we cheerfully disagree. Regardless of outcome, it is noncontroversial to say that psychotherapies of many origins share several features of process and content, and it follows that better understanding the patterns of these commonalities may be an important part of better understanding the effects of psychotherapies. That is, irrespective of whether some psychotherapies are equivalent to others in symptomatic outcome, understanding what part of clients' improvement is due to factors that are shared by several approaches appears to us to be a conceptually and clinically important question.