Doe v. Holy See (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Doe v. Holy See" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

14^th place

14^th place

4,690^th place

2,854^th place

4,919^th place

2,808^th place

1scotusblog.com

7,147^th place

3,830^th place

1,278^th place

765^th place

5^th place

5^th place

1ncregister.com

4,404^th place

2,623^rd place

1radiovaticana.va

7,482^nd place

low place

1radiovaticana.org

low place

low place

advocate.com

Bolcer, Julie (June 29, 2010). "Supreme Court Rejects Vatican Appeal". advocate.com. Los Angeles: Here Media. Archived from the original on July 2, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2010.. As the court has stated many times, however, denial of certiorari expresses no views on the merits. See, e.g. Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price 360 U.S. 246 n.1 (1959) (per curiam); Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 917-19 (1950) (Frankfurter, J.).

archive.today

Federal judge rules Vatican is not the employer of priests

leagle.com

Doe v. Holy See, 557 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2009).

ncregister.com

Gardner, Jeff (December 12, 2008). "U.S. Case Against Holy See May Go Forward, Court Rules". National Catholic Register. North Haven, Connecticut: Circle Media. ISSN 0027-8920. Archived from the original on February 8, 2009. Retrieved January 25, 2010.

ncronline.org

Appeals court dismisses sexual abuse lawsuit against Vatican

radiovaticana.org

oecumene.radiovaticana.org

Vatican lawyer responds to abuse accusations Archived March 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

radiovaticana.va

Statement of Jeffrey S. Lena Regarding Release of Documents in Doe v. Holy See

scotusblog.com

Denniston, Lyle (November 16, 2009). "Court adds one new case". SCOUTUSblog. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 25, 2010.

web.archive.org

Bolcer, Julie (June 29, 2010). "Supreme Court Rejects Vatican Appeal". advocate.com. Los Angeles: Here Media. Archived from the original on July 2, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2010.. As the court has stated many times, however, denial of certiorari expresses no views on the merits. See, e.g. Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price 360 U.S. 246 n.1 (1959) (per curiam); Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U.S. 912, 917-19 (1950) (Frankfurter, J.).
Gardner, Jeff (December 12, 2008). "U.S. Case Against Holy See May Go Forward, Court Rules". National Catholic Register. North Haven, Connecticut: Circle Media. ISSN 0027-8920. Archived from the original on February 8, 2009. Retrieved January 25, 2010.
Vatican lawyer responds to abuse accusations Archived March 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Gardner, Jeff (December 12, 2008). "U.S. Case Against Holy See May Go Forward, Court Rules". National Catholic Register. North Haven, Connecticut: Circle Media. ISSN 0027-8920. Archived from the original on February 8, 2009. Retrieved January 25, 2010.