Does 1-570 v. Bush (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Does 1-570 v. Bush" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
1,698th place
987th place
low place
low place

nationalreview.com

old.nationalreview.com

  • Deroy Murdock (December 5, 2005). "Gitmo legal: why are top-notch law firms aiding Gitmo detainees?". National Review. Archived from the original on May 1, 2010. Retrieved 2008-06-22. John Does 1-570 v. George W. Bush, which is essentially a class-action suit involving every enemy combatant at Gitmo not already suing the president for release during wartime.

shu.edu

law.shu.edu

  • Mark Denbeaux; et al. (August 21, 2006). "June 10th Suicides at Guantánamo: Government Words and Deeds Compared" (PDF). Seton Hall University. p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 29, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-11. The Government then informed counsel in December that the detainee had been positively identified because the newer version of the name more closely matched a detainee. However, the Government refused to provide the detainee's identification ISN number and also refused to allow the lawyers to send a letter to their client until the attorneys displayed their 'authority to initiate litigation on behalf of the petitioner.'

web.archive.org

  • Deroy Murdock (December 5, 2005). "Gitmo legal: why are top-notch law firms aiding Gitmo detainees?". National Review. Archived from the original on May 1, 2010. Retrieved 2008-06-22. John Does 1-570 v. George W. Bush, which is essentially a class-action suit involving every enemy combatant at Gitmo not already suing the president for release during wartime.
  • Mark Denbeaux; et al. (August 21, 2006). "June 10th Suicides at Guantánamo: Government Words and Deeds Compared" (PDF). Seton Hall University. p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 29, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-11. The Government then informed counsel in December that the detainee had been positively identified because the newer version of the name more closely matched a detainee. However, the Government refused to provide the detainee's identification ISN number and also refused to allow the lawyers to send a letter to their client until the attorneys displayed their 'authority to initiate litigation on behalf of the petitioner.'