Belkin, Aaron; Ender, Morten G.; et al. (2013). "Readiness and DADT Repeal: Has the New Policy of Open Service Undermined the Military?". Armed Forces & Society. 39 (4): 587. doi:10.1177/0095327X12466248. S2CID145357049.
Belkin, Aaron; Morton Ender (2013). "Readiness and DADT Repeal: Has the New Policy of Open Service Undermined the Military?". Armed Forces & Society. 39 (4): 587. doi:10.1177/0095327X12466248. S2CID145357049.
dtic.mil
"NUMBER 1332.14"(PDF). United States Department of Defense. September 30, 2011. Archived from the original(PDF) on October 26, 2011. Retrieved October 1, 2011.
Prakash, Om (2009). "The Efficacy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell""(PDF). Joint Force Quarterly. 2009 (55): 88–94. Archived from the original(PDF) on May 27, 2010. Retrieved December 22, 2010. The article won the Secretary of Defense National Security Essay competition for 2009.
"Opinions of Military Personnel on Sexual Minorities in the Military"(PDF). 2006. Archived from the original(PDF) on March 1, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2010. Respondents uncertain whether they had served with gay personnel, 2% thought gays would have a positive effect on personal morale, while 29% thought that they would have no impact and 48% thought that they would have a negative effect. Regarding overall unit morale, 2% thought that gays would have a positive effect on overall unit morale, 26% thought they would have no effect, and 58% thought they would have a negative effect. Some 73% of respondents said that they felt comfortable in the presence of gay and lesbian personnel.
Belkin, Aaron; Ender, Morten G.; et al. (2013). "Readiness and DADT Repeal: Has the New Policy of Open Service Undermined the Military?". Armed Forces & Society. 39 (4): 587. doi:10.1177/0095327X12466248. S2CID145357049.
Belkin, Aaron; Morton Ender (2013). "Readiness and DADT Repeal: Has the New Policy of Open Service Undermined the Military?". Armed Forces & Society. 39 (4): 587. doi:10.1177/0095327X12466248. S2CID145357049.
Article 125's prohibition against bestiality was included in its definition of sodomy. House Republicans, the Family Research Council, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals objected to the removal of "unnatural carnal copulation ... with an animal" from Article 125, not "unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex". See: Herb, Jeremy (December 9, 2011). "Repeal of sodomy, bestiality ban sparks fight on Defense bill", The Hill: Retrieved February 20, 2012: "The Pentagon, however, says that even if the article in the military code was repealed, having sex with animals would still be covered under different statutes. 'It is difficult to envision a situation where a service member engages in sexual conduct with an animal that would not be conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting,' said Defense spokesman Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale."
"Opinions of Military Personnel on Sexual Minorities in the Military"(PDF). 2006. Archived from the original(PDF) on March 1, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2010. Respondents uncertain whether they had served with gay personnel, 2% thought gays would have a positive effect on personal morale, while 29% thought that they would have no impact and 48% thought that they would have a negative effect. Regarding overall unit morale, 2% thought that gays would have a positive effect on overall unit morale, 26% thought they would have no effect, and 58% thought they would have a negative effect. Some 73% of respondents said that they felt comfortable in the presence of gay and lesbian personnel.
Prakash, Om (2009). "The Efficacy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell""(PDF). Joint Force Quarterly. 2009 (55): 88–94. Archived from the original(PDF) on May 27, 2010. Retrieved December 22, 2010. The article won the Secretary of Defense National Security Essay competition for 2009.
"NUMBER 1332.14"(PDF). United States Department of Defense. September 30, 2011. Archived from the original(PDF) on October 26, 2011. Retrieved October 1, 2011.
