Dor Daim (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dor Daim" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,586th place
5,464th place
low place
low place
2,486th place
1,836th place
7,785th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
121st place
142nd place

academia.edu

chabad.org

chayas.com

  • "The Rambam and the Jews of Yemen". Archived from the original on 2018-10-10. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
  • See excerpt from R. Qafiḥ's introduction to Mishneh Torah Archived 2007-09-26 at the Wayback Machine.

daat.ac.il

hebrewbooks.org

hevre.co.il

hydepark.hevre.co.il

judaismo-iberico.org

otzar.org

radicaltorahthought.com

seforimblog.com

shturem.net

snunit.k12.il

kodesh.snunit.k12.il

web.archive.org

  • "The Rambam and the Jews of Yemen". Archived from the original on 2018-10-10. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
  • Responsa of Rabbi Ratzon Arusi (Hebrew): דרדעים
  • See excerpt from R. Qafiḥ's introduction to Mishneh Torah Archived 2007-09-26 at the Wayback Machine.
  • "Idol worship is still within us". Archived from the original on 2007-06-02.
  • "הייד פארק - מרכז פורומים ישראלי - דרדעים כופרים". Archived from the original on 2014-10-29.
  • An Analysis of the Authenticity of the Zohar (2005), p. 39, with "Rav E" and "Rav G" later identified by the author as Rabbi Eliyahu Dessler and Rabbi Gedaliah Nadel, respectively (Rabbi Dr. Marc Shapiro in Milin Havivin Volume 5 [2011], Is there an obligation to believe that Rebbe Shimon bar Yochai wrote the Zohar?, p. יב [PDF page 133]):
    "I approached Rav A [Aryeh Carmell] with some of the questions on the Zohar, and he responded to me - 'and what about nikud? Nikud is also mentioned in the Zohar despite the fact that it [is] from Geonic times!' he said. I later found this comment in the Mitpachas Seforim. I would just add that not only is nikud mentioned, but only the Tiberian Nikkud - the norm in Europe of the middle ages - is mentioned and not the Yerushalmi nikud or the Babylonian one — which was used then in the Middle East, and is still used by Yemenites today. Also the Taamay Hamikrah - the trop - are referred to in the Zohar - only by their Sefardi Names. Rav A told me a remarkable piece of testimony: 'My rebbe (this is how he generally refers to Rav E [Elijah Dessler]) accepted the possibility that the Zohar was written sometime in the 13th century.'"
    "Rav G [Gedaliah Nadel] told me that he was still unsure as to the origin and status of the Zohar, but told me it was my absolute right to draw any conclusions I saw fit regarding both the Zohar and the Ari."
  • In derush 25 which "had previously only appeared in a censored form" (Rabbi Dr. Marc Shapiro, Concerning the Zohar and Other Matters) in Derushei HaTzlach, Warsaw 1886 (Shapiro in Milin Havivin Volume 5 [2011], Is there an obligation to believe that Rebbe Shimon bar Yochai wrote the Zohar?, p. ה [PDF page 126], footnote 13 [Hebrew]).
  • In a portion of derush 25 first published by Yehoshua Mondshine in Or Yisrael, Nisan 5766, על חיבור הזוה"ק ותוספות מאוחרות שנשתרבבו לתוכו (Hebrew), p. 202 (highlighted by Shapiro in Concerning the Zohar and Other Matters). This portion (along with the remainder) was later published, from manuscript, by Dr. Maoz Kahana and Michael K. Silber in Deists, Sabbatians and Kabbalists in Prague: A Censored Sermon of R. Ezekiel Landau, 1770, Kabbalah 21 (2010), p. 355 (Hebrew).

yahadut.org.il

  • yahadut.org.il which was written by Rabbi Yiḥyah Qafiḥ
  • Shevuth Teiman, Yisrael Yeshayahu & Aharon Tzadok, Tel-Aviv 1945, p. 216 (Hebrew), who brings down this teaching in the name of Shemuel b. Yosef Adeni, author of Naḥalath Yosef, who brings down the teaching in the name of Sefer HaBrit. The concept is further explained in Rabbi Qafih's seminal work, Milhamot Hashem, chapter 30 (Hebrew).