Browning 2012, Introduction: The Myth of Dracula's Reception: "That the sample of reviews relied upon by previous studies [...] is scant at best has unfortunately resulted in the common misconception about the novel's early critical reception being 'mixed'". Browning, John Edgar (2012). Bram Stoker's Dracula: The Critical Feast. Apocryphile Press. ISBN978-1-937002-21-3.
Browning 2012, Introduction: The Myth of Dracula's Reception: "Rather, while the novel did receive, on the one hand, a few reviews that were mixed, it enjoyed predominantly a critically strong early print life. Dracula was, by all accounts, a critically-acclaimed novel." Browning, John Edgar (2012). Bram Stoker's Dracula: The Critical Feast. Apocryphile Press. ISBN978-1-937002-21-3.
Browning 2012, Introduction: The Myth of Dracula's Reception: "Dracula's writing was seen by early reviewers and responders to parallel, if not supersede the Gothic horror works of such canonical writers as Mary Shelley, Ann Radcliffe, and Edgar Allan Poe." Browning, John Edgar (2012). Bram Stoker's Dracula: The Critical Feast. Apocryphile Press. ISBN978-1-937002-21-3.
Rhodes 2010, p. 29. Rhodes, Gary D. (1 January 2010). "Drakula Halála (1921): The Cinema's First Dracula". Horror Studies. 1 (1): 25–47. doi:10.1386/host.1.1.25/1.
Noll 1992, p. 3. Noll, Richard, ed. (1992). Vampires, Werewolves, and Demons: Twentieth-Century Reports in the Psychiatric Literature. Brunner/Mazel. ISBN978-0-87630-632-1.
Noll 1992, p. 11. Noll, Richard, ed. (1992). Vampires, Werewolves, and Demons: Twentieth-Century Reports in the Psychiatric Literature. Brunner/Mazel. ISBN978-0-87630-632-1.
