Drug Abuse Resistance Education (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Drug Abuse Resistance Education" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
4th place
4th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
6,037th place
3,633rd place
2,186th place
1,287th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
34th place
27th place
59th place
45th place
5,768th place
3,642nd place
5th place
5th place
22nd place
19th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
896th place
674th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
421st place
263rd place
7th place
7th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,169th place
1,838th place
702nd place
520th place
175th place
137th place
23rd place
32nd place

books.google.com

ca.gov

lao.ca.gov

cerd.org

chronicle.com

csun.edu

dare.com

dare.org

doi.org

drcnet.org

druglibrary.org

drugsense.org

fff.org

latimes.com

  • Newton, Jim (1993-09-09). "DARE Marks a Decade of Growth and Controversy : Youth: Despite critics, anti-drug program expands nationally. But some see declining support in LAPD". Retrieved 2021-04-15.

ncjrs.gov

  • Jeremy Travis, director of the National Institute of Justice – The D.A.R.E. Program: A Review of Prevalence, User Satisfaction, and Effectiveness. October 1994 (PDF document) Quote:"While not conclusive, the findings suggest that D.A.R.E. may benefit from using more interactive strategies and emphasizing social and general competencies. A revised D.A.R.E. curriculum that includes more participatory learning was piloted in 1993 and is being launched nationwide this fall."
  • Christopher L. Ringwalt, Jody M. Greene, Susan T. Ennett, Ronaldo Iachan, Richard R. Clayton, Carl G. Leukefeld. Past and Future Directions of the D.A.R.E. Program: An Evaluation Review. Research Triangle Institute. September 1994. Supported under Award # 91-DD-CX-K053 from the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise Gottfredson, Doris MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn Bushway – Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Report for the National Institute of Justice. Chapter 5. School-based Crime Prevention 1998. Quote: In summary, using the criteria adopted for this report, D.A.R.E. does not work to reduce substance use. The programs (sic) content, teaching methods and use of uniformed police officers rather than teachers might each explain its weak evaluations. No scientific evidence suggests that the D.A.R.E. core curriculum, as originally designed or revised in 1993, will reduce substance use in the absence of continued instruction more focused on social competency development. Any consideration of the D.A.R.E.'s potential as a drug prevention strategy should place D.A.R.E. in the context of instructional strategies in general. No instructional program is likely to have a dramatic effect on substance use. Estimates of the effect sizes of even the strongest of these programs are typically in the mid-to high-teens. D.A.R.E.'s meager effects place it at the bottom of the distribution of effect sizes, but none of the effects are large enough to justify their use as the centerpiece of a drug prevention strategy. Rather, such programs should be embedded within more comprehensive programs using the additional strategies identified elsewhere in this chapter.
  • National Institute of Justice. Research in Brief, July 1998. Summary of its Report to Congress, Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. (PDF document)

news.google.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

priceonomics.com

reason.com

samhsa.gov

modelprograms.samhsa.gov

scientificamerican.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

twitter.com

upenn.edu

publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu

vice.com

i-d.vice.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org