Dynamic frequency selection (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dynamic frequency selection" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
986th place
803rd place
low place
low place
9th place
13th place
1st place
1st place
low place
8,528th place
low place
low place
2,882nd place
2,105th place
2nd place
2nd place
18th place
17th place
5th place
5th place

cisco.com

blogs.cisco.com

doc.gov

ntia.doc.gov

doi.org

dot.gov.in

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

itu.int

  • Tristant, Philippe (23–24 October 2017). "C-band meteorological radars - Threats related to RLAN 5 GHz" (PDF). EUMETNET. Retrieved 5 December 2019 – via itu.int.
  • Tristant, Philippe (16–18 September 2009). "RLAN 5 GHz interference to weather radars in Europe" (PDF). International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved 4 December 2019. More than 12 European countries experienced such interference cases (other cases have now been reported in number of countries in the world). Definitively harmful interference (in Hungary, the radar was declared as non-operational for more than 1 month)

mikrotik.com

mum.mikrotik.com

  • Touw, Ron (Nov 16, 2016). "Radar Detection and DFS on MikroTik" (PDF). Radar Detect and DFS on MikroTik. MikroTik. Retrieved 4 December 2019 – via YouTube. Decision ERC/DEC/(99)23 adds 5250-5350MHz and 5470-5725MHz with more Tx power but with the added caveat that DFS was required to protect legacy users (Military Radar and Satellite uplinks)

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

youtube.com

  • Touw, Ron (Nov 16, 2016). "Radar Detection and DFS on MikroTik" (PDF). Radar Detect and DFS on MikroTik. MikroTik. Retrieved 4 December 2019 – via YouTube. Decision ERC/DEC/(99)23 adds 5250-5350MHz and 5470-5725MHz with more Tx power but with the added caveat that DFS was required to protect legacy users (Military Radar and Satellite uplinks)