Earmuffs (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Earmuffs" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
218th place
212th place
1st place
1st place
4,128th place
2,762nd place
5th place
5th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
9,614th place
low place
low place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,244th place
4,265th place
193rd place
152nd place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
low place
9,745th place

aiha.org

online-ams.aiha.org

  • Voix, Jérémie; Smith, Pegeen; Berger, Elliott H (2018). "Chapter 12: Field Fit-Testing and Attenuation-Estimation Procedures". In D.K. Meinke; E.H. Berger; R. Neitzel; D.P. Driscoll; K. Bright (eds.). The Noise Manual (6th ed.). Falls Church, Virginia: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 309–329. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
  • Berger, Elliott H.; Voix, Jérémie (2018). "Chapter 11: Hearing Protection Devices". In D.K. Meinke; E.H. Berger; R. Neitzel; D.P. Driscoll; K. Bright (eds.). The Noise Manual (6th ed.). Falls Church, Virginia: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 255–308. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

aplusanywhere.com

wba.aplusanywhere.com

archive.org

asha.org

audio-technica.com

cdc.gov

cdc.gov

blogs.cdc.gov

doi.org

  • Acton, W. Ian (1987). "History and development of hearing protection devices". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81 (S1): S4 – S5. Bibcode:1987ASAJ...81....4A. doi:10.1121/1.2024272.
  • Linda Rosenstock et al. "1.6.4 Confirmation Audiogram, Significant Threshold Shift, and Follow-up Action". Occupational Noise Exposure (Revised Criteria 1998, 2nd ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio. June 1998. p. 7. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB98126. Retrieved 10 August 2022. When a significant threshold shift has been validated, the employer shall take appropriate action to protect the worker from additional hearing loss due to occupational noise exposure. Examples of appropriate action include explanation of the effects of hearing loss, reinstruction and refitting of hearing protectors, additional training of the worker in hearing loss prevention, and reassignment of the worker to a quieter work area.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

en-standard.eu

  • Technical Committee CEN/TC 159 “Hearing protectors” (17 November 2021). EN 17479-2021. Hearing protectors - Guidance on selection of individual fit testing methods. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-539-04746-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) link

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

hearforever.org

honeywell.com

sps.honeywell.com

maine.gov

  • "Entrepreneurs | Maine Secretary of State Kids' Page". www.maine.gov. Retrieved 2019-12-12.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Denisov, Eduard; Shkarinov, Lev (1966). "The efficiency of several types of personal noise protectors and their selection as a function of the conditions of use". Labour Hygiene and Occupational Diseases (in Russian). 10 (6). Moscow: Publishers "Medicine": 38–43. ISSN 0016-9919. PMID 5987953.
  • Lipper, Joanna (2007-06-05). "Active Noise Reduction". Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.). 76 (6): 96, 98–9. PMID 17595971. Retrieved 2016-12-03.

nonoise.org

  • US OSHA (1980). "How OSHA can help employers and employees - Legal limits on noise". Noise Control. A guide for workers and employers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. p. 112. Retrieved 6 February 2024. Personal protective devices are generally not a good permanent solution for a number of reasons. ... They may not work effectively because of the difficulty in getting acceptable fit for each individual. In some cases-particularly when noise is intermittent and below 85 dB(A) - they may make communication more difficult, which can contribute to accidents and make jobs more difficult to perform.

ohsonline.com

osha.gov

web.archive.org

wired.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org