Education in Turkey (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Education in Turkey" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
6,988th place
low place
26th place
20th place
695th place
2,344th place
1,645th place
1,289th place
239th place
831st place
436th place
1,623rd place
low place
low place
8,123rd place
low place
1,402nd place
1,182nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
728th place
1,716th place
6,201st place
5,692nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
231st place
332nd place
1,807th place
low place
low place
7,835th place
745th place
2,194th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,395th place
5,414th place
low place
low place
68th place
117th place
low place
low place
1,073rd place
3,680th place
754th place
1,313th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,803rd place
3,266th place
2,675th place
2,028th place
485th place
440th place
6,310th place
low place
3,274th place
low place
305th place
264th place
121st place
142nd place
3,264th place
low place
low place
low place

aa.com.tr

academia.edu

ahaber.com.tr

al-monitor.com

almin7a.com

  • Dogan, Yonca Poyraz (8 September 2008). "Prof. Soysal: Most Turkish universities are still autocratic". Today's Zaman. Retrieved 7 September 2008. Before law No. 2547, rectors were appointed only by the president. Then upon the initiative of some of the universities, including Boğaziçi University, the system was changed. Now there is a middle ground: Both voting by the faculty and YÖK are involved in the process. As a result, YÖK and the president are involved in appointing rectors.[permanent dead link]

ankara.edu.tr

dspace.ankara.edu.tr

belgeler.com

books.google.com

cambridge.org

doi.org

  • Özelli, M. Tunç (January 1974). "The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 5 (1). London: Cambridge University Press: 77–92. doi:10.1017/s0020743800032803. ISSN 0020-7438. JSTOR 162345. S2CID 154739517.
  • Taeuber, Irene B. (April 1958). "Population and Modernization in Turkey". Population Index. 24 (2). Office of Population Research: 110. doi:10.2307/2731516. JSTOR 2731516. OCLC 41483131.
  • Erbal, Ayda (2015). "The Armenian Genocide, AKA the Elephant in the Room". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 47 (4): 783–790. doi:10.1017/S0020743815000987. ISSN 0020-7438. JSTOR 43998041. S2CID 162834123.
  • Adak, Hülya (2016). "Teaching the Armenian Genocide in Turkey: Curriculum, Methods, and Sources". PMLA. 131 (5): 1515–1518. doi:10.1632/pmla.2016.131.5.1515. ISSN 0030-8129. S2CID 164859829.
  • Aybak, Tunç (2016). "Geopolitics of Denial: Turkish State's 'Armenian Problem'" (PDF). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 18 (2): 125–144. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1141582. S2CID 147690827. This officially distributed educational material reconstructs the history in line with the denial policies of the government portraying the Armenians as backstabbers and betrayers, who are portrayed as a threat to the sovereignty and identity of modern Turkey. The demonization of the Armenians in Turkish education is a prevailing occurrence that is underwritten by the government to reinforce the denial discourse.
  • Galip, Özlem Belçim (2020). New Social Movements and the Armenian Question in Turkey: Civil Society vs. the State. Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 186. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59400-8. eISSN 2523-7993. ISBN 978-3-030-59400-8. ISSN 2523-7985. Additionally, for instance, the racism and language of hatred in officially approved school textbooks is very intense. These books still show Armenians as the enemies, so it would be necessary for these books to be amended...
  • Gürpınar, Doğan (2016). "The manufacturing of denial: the making of the Turkish 'official thesis' on the Armenian genocide between 1974 and 1990". Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 18 (3): 217–240 [234]. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1176397. S2CID 148518678. The Armenians were conspicuous by their absence in the school curriculum for decades. Their historical existence in Anatolia was deliberately dismissed... This deliberate omission ceased abruptly in the mid-1980s when a new sub-chapter was introduced tellingly entitled 'Armenian problem'... This sub-chapter depicted the 'Armenian problem' as an exploit and machination of Great Powers (i.e. Britain and Russia) who exploited Armenians as instruments to destabilize the Ottoman Empire and impose their mischievous plots."
    Dixon 2010b, p. 104. "In the 1950s, 60s and 70s, Turkish high school students did not learn anything about Armenians' existence in the Ottoman Empire or about their deportation during World War I (WWI). Starting in the 1980s, however, high school history textbooks taught Turkish students that Armenians rose up and violently attacked the Ottoman government and innocent fellow citizens prior to and during WWI, and that the government forcibly relocated Armenians in order to protect and preserve the Turkish nation. A decade later, Turkish high school students were told that Armenians were traitors and propagandists who had tried to take advantage of the weakness of the Ottoman Empire and had 'stabbed Turks in the back. And more recently, high school history textbooks in Turkey described the 'Turkish-Armenian War' that took place between Turks and Armenians following the end of World War 1,160 and mentioned that recent research and excavations have documented the fact that Armenians committed genocide against Turks."
  • Bilali, Rezarta (2013). "National Narrative and Social Psychological Influences in Turks' Denial of the Mass Killings of Armenians as Genocide: Understanding Denial". Journal of Social Issues. 69 (1): 16–33. doi:10.1111/josi.12001. The interpretations of this period of history in Turkish textbooks include accounts that may be interpreted as psychological justifications or excuses to deflect responsibility: (a) blaming Armenians for treason or for attacking Turkish–Muslim populations; (b) claiming that violent acts were in self-defense (protection from territorial loss and/or protection of the Turkish population that was being targeted by Armenian banditry); (c) shifting responsibility to external factors and third parties (claiming that Armenian deaths were a result of hardship); (d) claiming benevolent motivations behind the deportations (stopping the inter-communal warfare). These interpretations exemplify how moral disengagement mechanisms operate at the level of collective narratives. Three targets of attribution can be readily identified: the in-group (i.e., denial of responsibility), the out-group (i.e., blaming the victim), and situational factors (i.e., blaming third parties or circumstances).
  • Dixon, Jennifer M. (2010a). "Defending the Nation? Maintaining Turkey's Narrative of the Armenian Genocide". South European Society and Politics. 15 (3): 467–485. doi:10.1080/13608746.2010.513605. S2CID 144494811.

educationinturkey.net

esn.org

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

gazeteduvar.com.tr

haberturk.com

hedefyum.net

humanrightsmeasurement.org

hurriyet.com.tr

hurriyetdailynews.com

ibo.org

istanbul.edu.tr

  • "History". istanbul.edu.tr. Retrieved 12 June 2014.

jstor.org

mdx.ac.uk

eprints.mdx.ac.uk

  • Aybak, Tunç (2016). "Geopolitics of Denial: Turkish State's 'Armenian Problem'" (PDF). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 18 (2): 125–144. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1141582. S2CID 147690827. This officially distributed educational material reconstructs the history in line with the denial policies of the government portraying the Armenians as backstabbers and betrayers, who are portrayed as a threat to the sovereignty and identity of modern Turkey. The demonization of the Armenians in Turkish education is a prevailing occurrence that is underwritten by the government to reinforce the denial discourse.

meb.gov.tr

meb.gov.tr

ogm.meb.gov.tr

milliyet.com.tr

ntv.com.tr

oecd-ilibrary.org

omu.edu.tr

ise.omu.edu.tr

  • "Uluslararası Öğrenci Giriş Sınavı". Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2017. In order to study at Turkish Universities, candidates should take the International Student Exam (YÖS) or take one of the internationally valid exams and have the exam results and baccalaureate specified in the international student application and admission directive of the desired university.

oup.com

academic.oup.com

radikal.com.tr

  • "Rektörleri cumhurbaşkanı seçmemeli". Politika. Radikal (in Turkish). 27 August 2008. Retrieved 28 August 2008. Üniversiteler yeniden yapılanırken rektörlerin seçimi veya tayini ile ilgili yeni bir usul olması lazım. Bunlarda siyasi yarış gibi seçim olmaması lazım. Önemli olan bir üniversitenin rekabetinin büyümesinin gelişmesinin öne alınması lazım. Ben yeni bir sistemin getirilmesini, cumhurbaşkanının hiç bu işe karışmamasını arzu ediyorum. Bu konuda hem hükümete hem meclise çağrıda bulunmak isterim.

resmigazete.gov.tr

rightstracker.org

  • "Turkey". Rights Tracker.org. Retrieved 1 May 2023.

sabah.com.tr

english.sabah.com.tr

sagw.ch

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Özelli, M. Tunç (January 1974). "The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 5 (1). London: Cambridge University Press: 77–92. doi:10.1017/s0020743800032803. ISSN 0020-7438. JSTOR 162345. S2CID 154739517.
  • Erbal, Ayda (2015). "The Armenian Genocide, AKA the Elephant in the Room". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 47 (4): 783–790. doi:10.1017/S0020743815000987. ISSN 0020-7438. JSTOR 43998041. S2CID 162834123.
  • Adak, Hülya (2016). "Teaching the Armenian Genocide in Turkey: Curriculum, Methods, and Sources". PMLA. 131 (5): 1515–1518. doi:10.1632/pmla.2016.131.5.1515. ISSN 0030-8129. S2CID 164859829.
  • Aybak, Tunç (2016). "Geopolitics of Denial: Turkish State's 'Armenian Problem'" (PDF). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 18 (2): 125–144. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1141582. S2CID 147690827. This officially distributed educational material reconstructs the history in line with the denial policies of the government portraying the Armenians as backstabbers and betrayers, who are portrayed as a threat to the sovereignty and identity of modern Turkey. The demonization of the Armenians in Turkish education is a prevailing occurrence that is underwritten by the government to reinforce the denial discourse.
  • Gürpınar, Doğan (2016). "The manufacturing of denial: the making of the Turkish 'official thesis' on the Armenian genocide between 1974 and 1990". Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 18 (3): 217–240 [234]. doi:10.1080/19448953.2016.1176397. S2CID 148518678. The Armenians were conspicuous by their absence in the school curriculum for decades. Their historical existence in Anatolia was deliberately dismissed... This deliberate omission ceased abruptly in the mid-1980s when a new sub-chapter was introduced tellingly entitled 'Armenian problem'... This sub-chapter depicted the 'Armenian problem' as an exploit and machination of Great Powers (i.e. Britain and Russia) who exploited Armenians as instruments to destabilize the Ottoman Empire and impose their mischievous plots."
    Dixon 2010b, p. 104. "In the 1950s, 60s and 70s, Turkish high school students did not learn anything about Armenians' existence in the Ottoman Empire or about their deportation during World War I (WWI). Starting in the 1980s, however, high school history textbooks taught Turkish students that Armenians rose up and violently attacked the Ottoman government and innocent fellow citizens prior to and during WWI, and that the government forcibly relocated Armenians in order to protect and preserve the Turkish nation. A decade later, Turkish high school students were told that Armenians were traitors and propagandists who had tried to take advantage of the weakness of the Ottoman Empire and had 'stabbed Turks in the back. And more recently, high school history textbooks in Turkey described the 'Turkish-Armenian War' that took place between Turks and Armenians following the end of World War 1,160 and mentioned that recent research and excavations have documented the fact that Armenians committed genocide against Turks."
  • Dixon, Jennifer M. (2010a). "Defending the Nation? Maintaining Turkey's Narrative of the Armenian Genocide". South European Society and Politics. 15 (3): 467–485. doi:10.1080/13608746.2010.513605. S2CID 144494811.

theglobaleconomy.com

todayszaman.com

topuniversities.com

tuik.gov.tr

turkeyscholarship.com

turkiye.gov.tr

turkiyeburslari.gov.tr

unze.ba

web.archive.org

worldbank.org

siteresources.worldbank.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

yenicaggazetesi.com.tr