Efficacy of prayer (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Efficacy of prayer" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
11th place
8th place
207th place
136th place
6th place
6th place
3,411th place
2,303rd place
7th place
7th place
34th place
27th place
4,378th place
2,689th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,954th place
3,653rd place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place
179th place
183rd place
low place
8,161st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
487th place
842nd place
low place
low place
613th place
456th place

annals.org

  • John A. Astin, et al. The Efficacy of "Distant Healing" A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Annals of Internal Medicine June 6, 2000 vol. 132 no. 11 903–910 [1]

archive.org

biblegateway.com

books.google.com

centrastate.com

csicop.org

doi.org

galton.org

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

mja.com.au

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

  • Carey, Benedict (31 March 2006). "Long-Awaited Medical Study Questions the Power of Prayer". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2013.

ox.ac.uk

users.ox.ac.uk

patheos.com

  • "Popular Delusions III: Faith Healing". 26 September 2006. Retrieved 30 April 2018. Naturally, this result has provoked bitter complaints from many believers who assert that God should not be put to the test. In response to the MANTRA study, an English bishop said, "Prayer is not a penny in the slot machine. You can't just put in a coin and get out a chocolate bar." Similarly, in an article in The New York Times on prayer studies from October 10, 2004, Rev. Raymond J. Lawrence Jr. of New York-Presbyterian Hospital is quoted as saying, "There's no way to put God to the test, and that's exactly what you're doing when you design a study to see if God answers your prayers. This whole exercise cheapens religion, and promotes an infantile theology that God is out there ready to miraculously defy the laws of nature in answer to a prayer."

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

personal.psu.edu

reproductivemedicine.com

richarddawkins.net

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

stephenjaygould.org

templeton.org

warwick.ac.uk

wrap.warwick.ac.uk

washingtonpost.com

  • Boorstein, Michelle (6 December 2008). "Study of Health and Religiosity Growing Despite Criticism". Retrieved 18 November 2016 – via washingtonpost.com. While the field remains tiny – about $5 million is spent worldwide on such research, experts estimate – both sides view the stakes as huge.

web.archive.org

  • Carey, Benedict (31 March 2006). "Long-Awaited Medical Study Questions the Power of Prayer". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2013.
  • Mind and Spirit Archived 2009-02-01 at the Wayback Machine from the Health Library section of CentraState Healthcare System. Accessed May 18, 2006.
  • Martin, Michael (1994). "Pseudoscience, the Paranormal, and Science Education" (PDF). Science & Education. 3 (4): 364. Bibcode:1994Sc&Ed...3..357M. doi:10.1007/BF00488452. S2CID 22730647. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2018. Cures allegedly brought about by religious faith are, in turn, considered to be paranormal phenomena but the related religious practices and beliefs are not pseudoscientific since they usually have no scientific pretensions.
  • Flamm, Bruce (September–October 2004). "The Columbia University 'miracle' study: Flawed and fraud". Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 2009-11-06.
  • Skeptical Inquirer Archived 2008-02-29 at the Wayback Machine, Sept/Oct 2004
  • Benson H, Dusek JA, Sherwood JB, et al. (April 2006). "Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer". American Heart Journal. 151 (4): 934–942. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.028. PMID 16569567.