Electronic discovery (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Electronic discovery" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

3thesedonaconference.org

low place

low place

3,153^rd place

2,332^nd place

2justice.gov.uk

low place

6,649^th place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

2ctrlinitiative.com

low place

low place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

3^rd place

332^nd place

246^th place

1supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

2,160^th place

1techcrunch.com

187^th place

146^th place

8,888^th place

6,276^th place

1patents.google.com

1,182^nd place

725^th place

2^nd place

2^nd place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

1lawtechnologytoday.org

low place

low place

1researchgate.net

120^th place

125^th place

low place

6,986^th place

6,106^th place

3,582^nd place

1americanbar.org

7,096^th place

4,044^th place

americanbar.org

apps.americanbar.org

Article (2012). Ledergerber, Marcus (ed.). "Better Ediscovery: Unified Governance and the IGRM". American Bar Association. Archived from the original on 2016-10-11. Retrieved 2016-08-21.

books.google.com

Various (2009). Eoghan Casey (ed.). Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation. Academic Press. p. 567. ISBN 978-0-12-374267-4. Retrieved 27 August 2010.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure". LII / Legal Information Institute.

ctrlinitiative.com

S.D.N.Y (2015). Rio Tinto v. Vale Retrieved August 14, 2016
S.D.N.Y. (2016). Hyles v. New York City Retrieved August 14, 2016

curtin.edu.au

espace.curtin.edu.au

https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/93974/Adams%20RB%202023%20Public.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

doi.org

Richard, Adams; Graham, Mann; Valerie, Hobbs (2017). "ISEEK, a tool for high speed, concurrent, distributed forensic data acquisition". Research Online. doi:10.4225/75/5a838d3b1d27f.

ecu.edu.au

ro.ecu.edu.au

Qualcomm v. Broadcom: Implications for Electronic Discovery accessdate=2014-10-19
Richard, Adams; Graham, Mann; Valerie, Hobbs (2017). "ISEEK, a tool for high speed, concurrent, distributed forensic data acquisition". Research Online. doi:10.4225/75/5a838d3b1d27f.

fclr.org

Grossman, Maura R.; Cormack, Gordon V. (January 2013). "Grossman-Cormack glossary of technology-assisted review with foreword by John M. Facciola, U.S. Magistrate Judge" (PDF). Federal Courts Law Review. 7 (1). Stannardsville, Virginia: Federal Magistrate Judges Association: 6. Retrieved August 14, 2016.

justice.gov.uk

Ministry of Justice, PART 31 - DISCLOSURE AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS, accessed 11 September 2022
Ministry of Justice, PRACTICE DIRECTION 31B – DISCLOSURE OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS, last updated 1 October 2020, accessed 11 September 2022

lawtechnologytoday.org

Gricks, Thomas C. III; Ambrogi, Robert J. (November 17, 2015). "A brief history of technology assisted review". Law Technology Today. Chicago, Illinois: American Bar Association. Retrieved August 14, 2016.

logikcull.com

Logikcull. "Legal Hold and Data Preservation | Ultimate Guide to eDiscovery | Logikcull". Logikcull. Retrieved 2018-06-08.
Sullivan, Casey C. "How the IoT Is Solving Murders and Reshaping Discovery". Retrieved 2018-06-08.

mt.gov

sos.mt.gov

Sedona Conference (2007). Best practices recommendations & principles for addressing electronic document production Archived 2016-07-06 at the Wayback Machine

patents.google.com

"Method and system for searching for, and collecting, electronically-stored information". Elliot Spencer, Samuel J. Baker, Erik Andersen, Perlustro LP. 2009-11-25. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: others (link)

researchgate.net

Roitblat, Herbert; Kershaw, Anne. "Document categorization in legal electronic discovery: Computer classification vs. manual review". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 61 (1). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell: 1–10. Retrieved August 14, 2016.

richmond.edu

jolt.richmond.edu

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology Technology-assisted review in ediscovery can be more effective and more efficient than manual review Retrieved August 14, 2016

ricoh-usa.com

"Digital Forensics Services". www.ricoh-usa.com.

schneier.com

Schneier, Bruce (June 26, 2006). "Yet Another Redacting Failure]. Schneier on Security". Schneier.com.

supremecourt.gov

"2015 Amendments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-06-12. Retrieved 2017-06-27.

techcrunch.com

Kincaid, Jason (February 11, 2009). "The AP Reveals Details of Facebook/ConnectU Settlement With Greatest Hack Ever". TechCrunch.

thesedonaconference.org

"The Sedona Conference®". thesedonaconference.org.
Sedona Conference. TAR Case Law Primer Public Comment Version August 2016 Retrieved August 17, 2016
S.D.N.Y. (2012). Moore v. Publicis Archived 2013-03-10 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 13, 2016.

uwaterloo.ca

cormack.uwaterloo.ca

High Court, Ireland (2015). Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited v. Sean Quinn Retrieved August 13, 2016
High Court of Justice Chancery Division, U.K. (2016). Pyrrho Investments Ltd v. MWB Property Ltd Retrieved August 13, 2016
Practical Law Journal (2016). Continuous Active Learning for TAR Retrieved August 14, 2016

web.archive.org

"2015 Amendments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-06-12. Retrieved 2017-06-27.
S.D.N.Y. (2012). Moore v. Publicis Archived 2013-03-10 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 13, 2016.
Sedona Conference (2007). Best practices recommendations & principles for addressing electronic document production Archived 2016-07-06 at the Wayback Machine
Article (2012). Ledergerber, Marcus (ed.). "Better Ediscovery: Unified Governance and the IGRM". American Bar Association. Archived from the original on 2016-10-11. Retrieved 2016-08-21.

zapproved.com

"Judge Scheindlin Brought Great Insight and Leadership". March 28, 2016.
"Case Law AJ Holdings v. IP Holdings". January 13, 2015.