Electrostatic detection device (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Electrostatic detection device" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
15th place
8th place
low place
low place
14th place
9th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,455th place
1,821st place
low place
low place
low place
low place

aafs.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; English: 9th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

armorforensics.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

shop.armorforensics.com

csiforensic.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "About Us". CSI Forensic Supply. Retrieved 17 January 2011.

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

  • Seward, GH (1999), "Practical Implications of Charge Transport Model for Electrostatic Detection Apparatus (ESDA)", Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44 (4) 14560J, doi:10.1520/JFS14560J, Foster and Morantz attributed the ESDA image of indented writing to a change in capacitance of the Mylar-paper-platen structure (2). This change in capacitance was theoretically due to the compression of the paper.
  • Wanxiang, L.; Xiaoling, C. (1988), "A study of the principle of the electrostatic imaging technique", Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28 (4): 237–242, doi:10.1016/s0015-7368(88)72841-8
  • Seward, GH (1998), "Model for electrostatic imaging of forensic evidence via discharge through Mylar-paper path", Journal of Applied Physics, 83 (3): 71–76, Bibcode:1998JAP....83.1450S, doi:10.1063/1.366849, ISSN 0021-8979
  • Seward, GH (1999), "Practical Implications of Charge Transport Model for Electrostatic Detection Apparatus (ESDA)", Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44 (4) 14560J, doi:10.1520/JFS14560J
  • Yaraskavitch, Luke; Graydon, Matthew; Tanaka, Tobin; Ng, Lay-Keow (2008), "Controlled electrostatic methodology for imaging indentations in documents", Forensic Science International, 177 (2): 97–104, doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.11.004, PMID 18096338, In contrast with Seward's findings, a period of charge decay before image development is not required when operating in this optimal regime.
  • Strach, Steven J.; McCormack, Graeme M.; Radley, Robert W.; Westwood, Paul D. (1995), "Secondary impressions of writing detected by ESDA", Forensic Science International, 74 (3): 193–204, doi:10.1016/0379-0738(95)01761-7, Experiments have been performed which show conclusively that, under certain conditions, 'impressions' of writing can be detected by ESDA (ElectroStatic Detection Apparatus) on paper which has been placed in contact with the reverse of paper bearing writing which has significantly embossed the back. Such indirect 'secondary' impressions are caused by some degree of lateral relative motion of the two sheets of paper.
  • Strach, Steven J. (Sep 2007), "Writing impressions revealed by scanners", Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 3 (3): 210–216, doi:10.1007/s12024-007-0015-4, PMID 25869166, S2CID 24155830
  • Horan, G.J.; Horan, J.J. (November 1988). "How long after writing can an ESDA image be developed?". Forensic Science International. 39 (2): 119–125. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(88)90084-9.
  • Pearse, M.L.; J.S. Brennan (2 December 1996). "Importance of absolute humidity in the operation of the electrostatic detection apparatus". Forensic Science International. 83 (2): 121–131. doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(96)02026-9. However, we have further shown that relative humidity alone is not the primary determinant of the quality of ESDA results; at high levels of relative humidity and low temperatures there is a significant reduction in the quality of results and at very low relative humidity and high temperatures acceptable results can be obtained. These data strongly suggest that it is the absolute humidity of the atmosphere used that determines the quality of the ESDA results.
  • Craig, C.L.; Hornsby, B.M.; Riles, M. (July 2006). "Evaluation and Comparison of the Electrostatic Dust Print Lifter and the Electrostatic Detection Apparatus2 on the Development of Footwear Impressions on Paper". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51 (4): 819–826. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00173.x. PMID 16882226. S2CID 13400443.
  • Foster, D.J.; Morantz, D.J. (1979), "An Electrostatic Imaging Technique for the Detection of Indented Impressions in Documents", Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 13: 51–54, doi:10.1016/0379-0738(79)90262-7

fosterfreeman.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "ESDA2". Foster + Freeman Ltd. Retrieved 16 Aug 2022.
  • "ESDA-Lite". Foster + Freeman Ltd. Retrieved 17 January 2011.

gov.on.ca (Global: 3,455th place; English: 1,821st place)

mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca

  • MacVicar, R. (December 6, 2007). "Examination for Indentations Information" (PDF). Investigators & Submitters, Technical Information Sheets. Centre of Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Ontario, Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 17, 2011. Retrieved January 20, 2011. Fingerprinting using ninhydrin and other solvents inhibits the development of indentations

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Yaraskavitch, Luke; Graydon, Matthew; Tanaka, Tobin; Ng, Lay-Keow (2008), "Controlled electrostatic methodology for imaging indentations in documents", Forensic Science International, 177 (2): 97–104, doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.11.004, PMID 18096338, In contrast with Seward's findings, a period of charge decay before image development is not required when operating in this optimal regime.
  • Strach, Steven J. (Sep 2007), "Writing impressions revealed by scanners", Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 3 (3): 210–216, doi:10.1007/s12024-007-0015-4, PMID 25869166, S2CID 24155830
  • Craig, C.L.; Hornsby, B.M.; Riles, M. (July 2006). "Evaluation and Comparison of the Electrostatic Dust Print Lifter and the Electrostatic Detection Apparatus2 on the Development of Footwear Impressions on Paper". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51 (4): 819–826. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00173.x. PMID 16882226. S2CID 13400443.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

unask.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org