Embargo Act of 1807 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Embargo Act of 1807" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
70th place
63rd place
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
11th place
8th place
6th place
6th place
503rd place
364th place
699th place
479th place
7,574th place
4,352nd place
415th place
327th place
2,242nd place
1,513th place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
5,165th place
3,393rd place
26th place
20th place

archive.org

books.google.com

dartmouth.edu

doi.org

govtrackus.s3.amazonaws.com

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

jstor.org

loc.gov

rs6.loc.gov

loc.gov

mit.edu

web.mit.edu

  • [2] Rantakari, Heikki, 'The Antebellum Tariff on Cotton Textiles 1816-1860: Consolidation', 4 April 2003, retrieved 5 April 2023

monticello.org

  • "Embargo of 1807". Monticello and the Thomas Jefferson Foundation. Retrieved December 18, 2015.

rihs.org

  • Strum, Harvey (May 1994). "Rhode Island and the Embargo of 1807" (PDF). Rhode Island History. 52 (2): 58–67. ISSN 0035-4619. Although the state's manufacturers benefited from the embargo, taking advantage of the increased demand for domestically produced goods (especially cotton products), and merchants with idle capital were able to move from shipping and trade into manufacturing, this industrial growth did not compensate for the considerable distress that the embargo caused.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

smithsonianmag.com

  • [1] Smith, Ryan P., 'A History of America’s Ever-Shifting Stance on Tariffs: Unpacking a debate as old as the United States itself', Smithsonian Magazine, 18 April 2018, retrieved 5 April 2023

uconn.edu

opencommons.uconn.edu

vermonthistory.org

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • Strum, Harvey (May 1994). "Rhode Island and the Embargo of 1807" (PDF). Rhode Island History. 52 (2): 58–67. ISSN 0035-4619. Although the state's manufacturers benefited from the embargo, taking advantage of the increased demand for domestically produced goods (especially cotton products), and merchants with idle capital were able to move from shipping and trade into manufacturing, this industrial growth did not compensate for the considerable distress that the embargo caused.