Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Eric Weinstein" in English language version.
[W]ith no published equations to review, the highly public airing of his theory has generated heated controversy. Today, Weinstein attempted to rectify the situation by repeating his lecture at Oxford. This time a number of physicists were in the lecture hall. Most remain doubtful.
[W]ith no published equations to review, the highly public airing of his theory has generated heated controversy. Today, Weinstein attempted to rectify the situation by repeating his lecture at Oxford. This time a number of physicists were in the lecture hall. Most remain doubtful.
Grand claims like Weinstein's would – in the normal course of science – be accompanied by a technical paper explaining their foundations. [...] Du Sautoy – the University of Oxford's professor of the public understanding of science, no less – has short-circuited science's basic checks and balances.
Until Weinstein produces a paper, physicists will remain unconvinced and, crucially, unable to properly assess the claims he is making.
[W]ith no published equations to review, the highly public airing of his theory has generated heated controversy. Today, Weinstein attempted to rectify the situation by repeating his lecture at Oxford. This time a number of physicists were in the lecture hall. Most remain doubtful.
