European Arrest Warrant (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "European Arrest Warrant" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

13europa.eu

68^th place

117^th place

5doi.org

2^nd place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

2coe.int

772^nd place

849^th place

2bailii.org

3,544^th place

1,912^th place

2independent.ie

315^th place

209^th place

1creativecommons.org

1,010^th place

612^th place

1europeanlawblog.eu

low place

1kuleuven.be

4,725^th place

3,556^th place

1camera.it

1,915^th place

5,387^th place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1unibe.ch

2,608^th place

3,516^th place

1inabsentieaw.eu

low place

1fairtrials.net

low place

1fairtrials.org

low place

bailii.org

Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011] EWHC 2849 (Admin)
Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22

camera.it

"L 69/2005". Camera.it. 29 April 2005. Archived from the original on 8 February 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2012.

coe.int

"Overuse of the European Arrest Warrant – a threat to human rights". Council of Europe. Retrieved 20 September 2023.
Made an absolute reservation under the European Convention on Extradition refusing the extradition of its nationals. "List of declarations made with respect to treaty No. 024: European Convention on Extradition". Retrieved 15 September 2022.

creativecommons.org

European Commission (20 July 2023). "European Arrest Warrant". Retrieved 20 September 2023. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

doi.org

Hinarejos, A. (2007). "Recent Human Rights Developments in the EU Courts: The Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Arrest Warrant and Terror Lists". Human Rights Law Review. 7 (4): 793–811. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngm029. The second part of this article will deal with the decision of the ECJ that the highly controversial European Arrest Warrant (EAW) does not breach the principles of legality and equality.
Sarmiento, D. (2007). "European Union: The European Arrest Warrant and the quest for constitutional coherence". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 6 (1): 171–183. doi:10.1093/icon/mom040. This was the case that gave the ECJ the opportunity to make an authoritative decision that would settle the EAW question, a highly controversial and delicate matter that involves structural issues pertaining to the EU, national constitutional limits, and the authority of European and national courts.
van der Mei, Anne Pieter (2017). "The European Arrest Warrant system: Recent developments in the case law of the Court of Justice". Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 24 (6): 882–904. doi:10.1177/1023263X17745804. Since its adoption, the FDEAW has been controversial, mainly because the execution of EAWs in furtherance of the mutual recognition principle may conflict with the accused or convicted person's fundamental rights. Mutual recognition is based on mutual trust or confidence. It is presumed that the criminal law authorities of other Member States comply with the right to a fair trial and other (related) fundamental rights. In practice, however, this presumption does not necessarily hold true.
Brodersen, K. H.; Glerum, Vincent; Klip, A. H. (2022). "The European arrest warrant and in absentia judgments: The cause of much trouble". New Journal of European Criminal Law. 13 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1177/20322844221082488.
Ivičević Karas, Elizabeta (2019). "Decisions Rendered in Absentia as a Ground to Refuse the Execution of a European Arrest Warrant: European Legal Standards and Implementation in Croatian Law". EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series. Eu and Member States – Legal and Economic Issues. 3: 459. doi:10.25234/eclic/9011. ISBN 978-953-8109-29-4.

europa.eu

eur-lex.europa.eu

"EU Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant (2002/584/JHA), Article 1(1)". European Union. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009 amending Framework Decisions 2002/584/JHA, 2005/214/JHA, 2006/783/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA, thereby enhancing the procedural rights of persons and fostering the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial (OJ L 81, 27.3.2009, p. 24).
Article 5 of the Framework Decision as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009 amending Framework Decisions 2002/584/JHA, 2005/214/JHA, 2006/783/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA, thereby enhancing the procedural rights of persons and fostering the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial (OJ L 81, 27.3.2009, p. 24).
European Commission (11 April 2011). "Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States SEC(2011) 430 final". Brussels. p. 11. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

europarl.europa.eu

"Number of EAWs issued and resulting in effective surrender, aggregate 2005-13" (PDF). European Parliament. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
European Council. "Tampere European Council 15 and 16 October 1999: Presidency Conclusions". para. 35. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
"Misuse of the European Arrest Warrant by Spain". European Parliament. 7 February 2019. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

consilium.europa.eu

"Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on simplified extradition procedure between the Member States of the European Union". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
"Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union relating to Extradition between the Member States of the European Union". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

commission.europa.eu

European Commission (20 July 2023). "European Arrest Warrant". Retrieved 20 September 2023. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

data.europa.eu

"Council Decision of 27 November 2014 determining certain consequential and transitional arrangements concerning the cessation of the participation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in certain acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon". Official Journal of the European Union. 343 (11). 27 November 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

ec.europa.eu

Commission Staff Working Document Annex to the Report From The Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (revised version) {COM(2006)8 final} 24 January 2006, page 13, SEC(2006)79.

data.consilium.europa.eu

"Proposed subject for discussion at the experts' meeting on the application of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant on 17 July 2007 – the proportionality principle". Council of the European Union. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2012.

europeanlawblog.eu

Cantone, Claudia (19 May 2022). "The principle of proportionality and the EAW: uneasy bedfellows?". European Law Blog. Retrieved 20 September 2023.

fairtrials.net

"Justice in Europe: The Arrest Warrant". Fair Trials international. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2012.

fairtrials.org

"Carles Puigdemont and the European Arrest Warrant: Frequently Asked Questions – an update". Fair Trials. 27 March 2018. Archived from the original on 22 September 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2019.

inabsentieaw.eu

"Home". InAbsentiEAW. Retrieved 28 November 2023.

independent.ie

Dearbhail McDonald (9 July 2007). "Courts refuse to extradite man in child death crash". The Irish Independent. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
Tim Healy (12 February 2011). "Man fails in bid to stop Hungarian extradition". Retrieved 15 September 2022.

kuleuven.be

law.kuleuven.be

Wouters, Jan; Naert, Frederik (June 2004). "Of Arrest Warrants, Terrorist Offences and Extradition Deals: An Appraisal of the EU's Main Criminal Law Measures against Terrorism after '11 September'" (PDF). Institute for International Law Working Paper. Institute for International Law, K.U. Leuven. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

ssrn.com

Mathisen, Gjermund, "Nordic Cooperation and the European Arrest Warrant: Intra-Nordic Extradition, the Nordic Arrest Warrant and Beyond" 79 (2010) Nordic Journal of International Law 1 at 10.

unibe.ch

servat.unibe.ch

"Article 25.5 of the Constitution of Bulgaria as adopted on 12 July 1991". Servat.unibe.ch. Retrieved 15 September 2022.

web.archive.org

"L 69/2005". Camera.it. 29 April 2005. Archived from the original on 8 February 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
"Justice in Europe: The Arrest Warrant". Fair Trials international. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
"Carles Puigdemont and the European Arrest Warrant: Frequently Asked Questions – an update". Fair Trials. 27 March 2018. Archived from the original on 22 September 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2019.