Exclusionary rule (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Exclusionary rule" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

9findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

4books.google.com

3^rd place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2doi.org

2^nd place

2jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

2harvardlawreview.org

low place

6,995^th place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1northwestern.edu

2,302^nd place

1,389^th place

1justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

1utah.edu

2,446^th place

1,661^st place

1scotusblog.com

7,147^th place

3,830^th place

1economist.com

254^th place

236^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1oyez.org

8,598^th place

4,874^th place

1reuters.com

49^th place

47^th place

1fairamendment.us

low place

1uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

1tiafp.org

low place

1heinonlinebackup.com

low place

1bepress.com

7,958^th place

5,250^th place

bepress.com

works.bepress.com

Roger Roots, "The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence", Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 42-76 (2014) http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=roger_roots^{[permanent dead link]}

books.google.com

Roe v. Harvey, 98 Eng. Rep. 302 (K.B. 1769).
Rudd's Case, 168 Eng. Rep. 160 (K.B. 1775).
King v. Warickshall, 168 Eng. Rep. 234, 235 (K.B. 1783).
Polenberg, Richard (1997). The World of Benjamin Cardozo: Personal Values and the Judicial Process. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 203–207. ISBN 0674960521. Retrieved January 13, 2012. ISBN 978-0674960527

doi.org

Allen, Francis A. (1961). "Exclusionary Rule in the American Law of Search and Seizure, The Exclusionary Rule Regarding Illegally Seized Evidence". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science. 52 (3): 246–254. doi:10.2307/1141101. JSTOR 1141101.
Oaks, Dallin H. (1970). "Studying the exclusionary rule in Search and Seizure". University of Chicago Law Review. 37 (4). The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4: 665–757. doi:10.2307/1598840. JSTOR 1598840.

economist.com

"Amended". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved June 26, 2016.

fairamendment.us

Spence, Karl (2006). "Fair or Foul? Exclusionary rule hurts the innocent by protecting the guilty". Yo! Liberals! You Call This Progress?. Converse, Texas: Chattanooga Free Press/Fielding Press. ISBN 0976682605. Retrieved January 7, 2013. ISBN 978-0976682608.

findlaw.com

laws.findlaw.com

Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967).
Zoo v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886).
Adams v. New York, 192 U.S. 585 (1904).
Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).
Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
Silverthorne Lumber v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000) (Thomas, J., concurring): "A substantial body of evidence suggests that the Fifth Amendment privilege protects against the compelled production not just of incriminating testimony, but of any incriminating evidence."
Iowa v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277, 285-86 (Iowa 2000).
Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)

harvardlawreview.org

cdn.harvardlawreview.org

Re, Richard. "The Due Process Exclusionary Rule: A new textual foundation for a rule in crisis" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 1885 (2014). See also "Regarding Re’s Revisionism: Notes on The Due Process Exclusionary Rule", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 302 (2014).

harvardlawreview.org

Re, Richard. "The Due Process Exclusionary Rule: A new textual foundation for a rule in crisis" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 1885 (2014). See also "Regarding Re’s Revisionism: Notes on The Due Process Exclusionary Rule", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 302 (2014).

heinonlinebackup.com

Barnett, Randy E. (1983). "Resolving the Dilemma of the Exclusionary Rule: An Application of Restitutive Principles of Justice". Emory L. J. 32: 937.

jstor.org

Allen, Francis A. (1961). "Exclusionary Rule in the American Law of Search and Seizure, The Exclusionary Rule Regarding Illegally Seized Evidence". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science. 52 (3): 246–254. doi:10.2307/1141101. JSTOR 1141101.
Oaks, Dallin H. (1970). "Studying the exclusionary rule in Search and Seizure". University of Chicago Law Review. 37 (4). The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4: 665–757. doi:10.2307/1598840. JSTOR 1598840.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

Allen, Francis A. (1961). "Exclusionary Rule in the American Law of Search and Seizure, The Exclusionary Rule Regarding Illegally Seized Evidence". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science. 52 (3): 246–254. doi:10.2307/1141101. JSTOR 1141101.

nytimes.com

Stagg, Tom (July 15, 1991). "Letter to the Editor". The New York Times. Shreveport, La. Retrieved January 7, 2013.
Taylor, Stuart Jr. (January 26, 1983). "Exclusionary-Rule Fight Moves to Supreme Court". The New York Times.

oyez.org

"FLORIDA v. JIMENO". Oyez. 1991.

reuters.com

Shiffman, John; Cooke, Kristina (August 5, 2013). "Exclusive: U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans". Reuters. Retrieved August 5, 2013.

scotusblog.com

"Opinion analysis: The exclusionary rule is weakened but it still lives". June 20, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.

ssrn.com

Davies, Thomas. “Farther and Farther from the Original Fifth Amendment: The Recharacterization of the Right Against Self-Incrimination as a 'Trial Right' in Chavez V. Martinez”, Tennessee Law Review, Volume 70, pages 987–1045 (2003).

tiafp.org

Nestlerode, Jana (Winter–Spring 2010). "Handcuffing America's Fourth Amendment: ERODING THE INTENT OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE" (PDF). The Forensic Digest. 2 (1). Journal of the Academy of Forensic Nursing Science: 22–35. Retrieved January 7, 2013.^{[permanent dead link]}

uchicago.edu

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu

Oaks, Dallin H. (1970). "Studying the exclusionary rule in Search and Seizure". University of Chicago Law Review. 37 (4). The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4: 665–757. doi:10.2307/1598840. JSTOR 1598840.

utah.edu

law.utah.edu

Cassell, Paul. "The Mysterious Creation of Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rules Under State Constitutions: The Utah Example," Archived February 25, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Utah Law Review, No. 3, page 751, 756 (1993).

web.archive.org

Re, Richard. "The Due Process Exclusionary Rule: A new textual foundation for a rule in crisis" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 1885 (2014). See also "Regarding Re’s Revisionism: Notes on The Due Process Exclusionary Rule", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 127, p. 302 (2014).
Cassell, Paul. "The Mysterious Creation of Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rules Under State Constitutions: The Utah Example," Archived February 25, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Utah Law Review, No. 3, page 751, 756 (1993).

worldcat.org

"Amended". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved June 26, 2016.