Falcon 9 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Falcon 9" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
6,194th place
5,551st place
1,876th place
1,225th place
2,930th place
2,204th place
2,428th place
1,659th place
936th place
713th place
388th place
265th place
75th place
83rd place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
9th place
13th place
1,181st place
736th place
low place
8,677th place
1,808th place
1,159th place
114th place
90th place
9,535th place
6,953rd place
3,691st place
3,233rd place
4,664th place
3,842nd place
low place
low place
137th place
101st place
23rd place
32nd place
8th place
10th place
774th place
716th place
1,943rd place
1,253rd place
6,627th place
3,775th place
low place
low place
28th place
26th place
4,774th place
2,901st place
3rd place
3rd place
529th place
314th place
223rd place
162nd place
530th place
319th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
546th place
326th place
low place
low place
1,009th place
607th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
32nd place
21st place
910th place
593rd place
439th place
283rd place
low place
low place
41st place
34th place
4,157th place
2,583rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,259th place
839th place
low place
low place
187th place
146th place
low place
low place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,983rd place
1,330th place
low place
low place
4,171st place
2,565th place
7,813th place
4,791st place
220th place
155th place
8,300th place
6,251st place
1,239th place
760th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,342nd place
3,952nd place
3,806th place
low place
260th place
1,423rd place

9news.com

af.mil

patrick.af.mil

airspacemag.com

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.today

arstechnica.com

aviationweek.com

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

cleveland.com

cnbc.com

cnn.com

defensenews.com

espace-exploration.com

  • "Fiche Technique: Falcon-9" [Technical data sheet: Falcon 9]. Espace & Exploration (in French). No. 39. May 2017. pp. 36–37. Archived from the original on August 21, 2017. Retrieved June 27, 2017.

everydayastronaut.com

faa.gov

flightglobal.com

floridatoday.com

gdconf.com

schedule.gdconf.com

geekwire.com

ghostarchive.org

hobbyspace.com

house.gov

science.house.gov

inverse.com

kosmonavtika.com

launchphotography.com

maxar.com

nasa.gov

nasa.gov

msdb.gsfc.nasa.gov

ntrs.nasa.gov

hq.nasa.gov

nasaspaceflight.com

nbcnews.com

nbcnews.com

cosmiclog.nbcnews.com

newizv.ru

newscientist.com

newspacewatch.com

orlandosentinel.com

blogs.orlandosentinel.com

parabolicarc.com

popularmechanics.com

sae.org

saemobilus.sae.org

seradata.com

ses.com

skyrocket.de

space.skyrocket.de

  • Krebs, Gunter D. "Jupiter 3 / EchoStar 24". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
  • Krebs, Gunter. "Telkom-4". Gunter's Space Page. Gunter. Archived from the original on May 15, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2018.

space.com

spacecenter.org

spacedaily.com

spaceexplored.com

spaceflight101.com

spaceflight101.net

spaceflightinsider.com

spaceflightnow.com

spaceforce.mil

vandenberg.spaceforce.mil

spacenews.com

spacetv.net

spacex.com

  • "Capabilities & Services" (PDF). SpaceX. 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 7, 2024. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  • "Falcon 9 (2015)". SpaceX. November 16, 2012. Archived from the original on December 9, 2015. Retrieved December 3, 2015.
  • "Falcon 9 (2013)". SpaceX. November 16, 2012. Archived from the original on November 29, 2013. Retrieved December 4, 2013.
  • "Falcon 9 Overview (2010)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on December 22, 2010. Retrieved May 8, 2010.
  • "Falcon 9 (2016)". SpaceX. November 16, 2012. Archived from the original on July 15, 2013. Retrieved May 3, 2016.
  • "Falcon 9". SpaceX. November 16, 2012. Archived from the original on May 1, 2013. Retrieved September 29, 2013.
  • "SpaceX Falcon 9 Upper Stage Engine Successfully Completes Full Mission Duration Firing" (Press release). SpaceNews. March 10, 2009. Archived from the original on December 13, 2014. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  • SpaceX (December 15, 2010). "SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft successfully re-enters from orbit" (Press release). Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  • SpaceX (December 23, 2008). "NASA selects SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster and Dragon spacecraft for cargo resupply" (Press release). Archived from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
  • "The Facts About SpaceX Costs". spacex.com. May 4, 2011. Archived from the original on March 28, 2013.
  • "SpaceX Announces the Falcon 9 Fully Reusable Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle" (Press release). SpaceX. September 8, 2005. Archived from the original on August 15, 2008.
  • "SpaceX Conducts First Multi-Engine Firing of Falcon 9 Rocket" (Press release). SpaceX. January 18, 2008. Archived from the original on January 3, 2010. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  • "SpaceX successfully conducts full mission-length firing of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle" (Press release). SpaceX. November 23, 2008. Archived from the original on February 9, 2009. Retrieved November 24, 2008.
  • "Updates". SpaceX. February 25, 2010. Archived from the original on August 17, 2011. Retrieved June 4, 2010.
  • Shanklin, Emily (September 24, 2013). "Production at SpaceX". SpaceX. Archived from the original on April 3, 2016. Retrieved September 29, 2013.
  • "Falcon User's Guide" (PDF). SpaceX. April 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  • Shanklin, Emily (April 12, 2013). "Octaweb". SpaceX. SpaceX News. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved August 2, 2013.
  • "Falcon Payload User's Guide, 2021" (PDF). SpaceX. Retrieved November 28, 2024.
  • "Landing Legs". SpaceX News. April 12, 2013. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved August 2, 2013. The Falcon Heavy first stage center core and boosters each carry landing legs, which will land each core safely on Earth after takeoff.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide, 2009" (PDF). SpaceX. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 29, 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2010.
  • Shanklin, Emily (July 29, 2013). "Octaweb". SpaceX. Archived from the original on August 2, 2013. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
  • Shanklin, Emily (July 29, 2013). "Landing Legs". SpaceX. Archived from the original on August 6, 2013. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide, Rev. 2.0" (PDF). October 21, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 14, 2017. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide" (PDF). October 21, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 14, 2017. Retrieved November 29, 2015.
  • "Updates: December 2007". Updates Archive. SpaceX. Archived from the original on January 4, 2011. Retrieved December 27, 2012. "Once we have all nine engines and the stage working well as a system, we will extensively test the "engine out" capability. This includes explosive and fire testing of the barriers that separate the engines from each other and from the vehicle. ... It should be said that the failure modes we've seen to date on the test stand for the Merlin 1C are all relatively benign – the turbo pump, combustion chamber and nozzle do not rupture explosively even when subjected to extreme circumstances. We have seen the gas generator (that drives the turbo pump assembly) blow apart during a start sequence (there are no checks in place to prevent that from happening), but it is a small device, unlikely to cause major damage to its own engine, let alone the neighbouring ones. Even so, as with engine nacelles on commercial jets, the fire/explosive barriers will assume that the entire chamber blows apart in the worst possible way. The bottom close-out panels are designed to direct any force or flame downward, away from neighbouring engines and the stage itself. ... we've found that the Falcon 9's ability to withstand one or even multiple engine failures, just as commercial airliners do, and still complete its mission is a compelling selling point with customers. Apart from the Space Shuttle and Soyuz, none of the existing [2007] launch vehicles can afford to lose even a single thrust chamber without causing loss of mission".
  • "Falcon 9 Overview (2012)". SpaceX. November 16, 2012. Archived from the original on March 23, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2013.
  • Spacexcmsadmin (November 28, 2012). "Capabilities & Services (2013)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on August 2, 2013.
  • Spacexcmsadmin (November 28, 2012). "Capabilities & Services (2014)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014.
  • Spacexcmsadmin (March 24, 2022). "Capabilities & Services (2016)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on May 5, 2016.
  • "Capabilities & Services" (PDF). SpaceX. January 2024. Retrieved December 9, 2024.
  • "Why the US can beat China: the facts about SpaceX costs". May 4, 2011. Archived from the original on March 28, 2013.
  • "Smallsat Rideshare Program". spacex. Retrieved March 17, 2025.

stackexchange.com

space.stackexchange.com

tass.ru

techcrunch.com

technologyreview.com

teslarati.com

thespacereview.com

  • Money, Stewart (March 12, 2012). "Competition and the future of the EELV program (part 2)". The Space Review. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved October 2, 2014. "The government is the necessary anchor tenant for commercial cargo, but it's not sufficient to build a new economic ecosystem", says Scott Hubbard, an aeronautics researcher at Stanford University in California and former director of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
  • Foust, Jeff (August 22, 2011). "New opportunities for smallsat launches". The Space Review. Archived from the original on December 23, 2011. Retrieved September 27, 2011. SpaceX ... developed prices for flying those secondary payloads ... A P-POD would cost between $200,000 and $325,000 for missions to LEO, or $350,000 to $575,000 for missions to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO). An ESPA-class satellite weighing up to 180 kilograms would cost $4–5 million for LEO missions and $7–9 million for GTO missions, he said.

thespaceshow.com

archived.thespaceshow.com

theverge.com

transterrestrial.com

  • Simburg, Rand (June 16, 2010). "SpaceX Press Conference". Archived from the original on December 18, 2010. Retrieved June 16, 2010.. Musk quote: "We will never give up! Never! Reusability is one of the most important goals. If we become the biggest launch company in the world, making money hand over fist, but we're still not reusable, I will consider us to have failed".

twitter.com

universetoday.com

usatoday.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

x.com

youtube.com