Falcon 9 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Falcon 9" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
6,194th place
5,551st place
2,930th place
2,204th place
1,876th place
1,225th place
2,428th place
1,659th place
936th place
713th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
75th place
83rd place
388th place
265th place
9th place
13th place
1,181st place
736th place
low place
8,677th place
1,808th place
1,159th place
114th place
90th place
9,535th place
6,953rd place
3,691st place
3,233rd place
4,664th place
3,842nd place
low place
low place
137th place
101st place
23rd place
32nd place
8th place
10th place
774th place
716th place
1,943rd place
1,253rd place
6,627th place
3,775th place
low place
low place
28th place
26th place
4,774th place
2,901st place
3rd place
3rd place
529th place
314th place
223rd place
162nd place
530th place
319th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
546th place
326th place
low place
low place
1,009th place
607th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
32nd place
21st place
910th place
593rd place
439th place
283rd place
low place
low place
41st place
34th place
4,157th place
2,583rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,259th place
839th place
low place
low place
187th place
146th place
low place
low place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,983rd place
1,330th place
4,171st place
2,565th place
low place
low place
7,813th place
4,791st place
8,446th place
6,634th place
2,734th place
1,606th place
212th place
172nd place
70th place
63rd place
low place
8,947th place
8,300th place
6,251st place
1,239th place
760th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,342nd place
3,952nd place
3,806th place
low place
260th place
1,423rd place

9news.com

advanced-television.com

af.mil

patrick.af.mil

airspacemag.com

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.today

arstechnica.com

aviationweek.com

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

c-span.org

cleveland.com

cnn.com

defensenews.com

espace-exploration.com

  • "Fiche Technique: Falcon-9" [Technical data sheet: Falcon 9]. Espace & Exploration (in French). No. 39. May 2017. pp. 36–37. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.

everydayastronaut.com

faa.gov

flightglobal.com

floridatoday.com

gdconf.com

schedule.gdconf.com

geekwire.com

ghostarchive.org

hobbyspace.com

house.gov

science.house.gov

inverse.com

kosmonavtika.com

launchphotography.com

loc.gov

webarchive.loc.gov

nasa.gov

nasa.gov

msdb.gsfc.nasa.gov

ntrs.nasa.gov

hq.nasa.gov

nasaspaceflight.com

nbcnews.com

nbcnews.com

cosmiclog.nbcnews.com

newizv.ru

newscientist.com

newspacewatch.com

noaa.gov

nmfs.noaa.gov

orlandosentinel.com

blogs.orlandosentinel.com

parabolicarc.com

popularmechanics.com

sae.org

saemobilus.sae.org

seradata.com

ses.com

skyrocket.de

space.skyrocket.de

  • Krebs, Gunter D. "Jupiter 3 / EchoStar 24". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 17 May 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2023.
  • Krebs, Gunter. "Telkom-4". Gunter's Space Page. Gunter. Archived from the original on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2018.

space.com

spacecenter.org

spacedaily.com

spaceexplored.com

spaceflight101.com

spaceflight101.net

spaceflightinsider.com

spaceflightnow.com

spaceforce.mil

vandenberg.spaceforce.mil

spacenews.com

spaceref.com

spacetv.net

spacex.com

  • "Capabilities & Services" (PDF). SpaceX. 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 June 2024. Retrieved 6 July 2024.
  • "Falcon 9 (2015)". SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 9 December 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  • "Falcon 9 (2013)". SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  • "Falcon 9 Overview (2010)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 22 December 2010. Retrieved 8 May 2010.
  • "Falcon 9 (2016)". SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 15 July 2013. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
  • "Falcon 9". SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 1 May 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  • "SpaceX Falcon 9 Upper Stage Engine Successfully Completes Full Mission Duration Firing" (Press release). SpaceNews. 10 March 2009. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
  • SpaceX (15 December 2010). "SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft successfully re-enters from orbit" (Press release). Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  • SpaceX (23 December 2008). "NASA selects SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster and Dragon spacecraft for cargo resupply" (Press release). Archived from the original on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  • "The Facts About SpaceX Costs". spacex.com. 4 May 2011. Archived from the original on 28 March 2013.
  • "SpaceX Announces the Falcon 9 Fully Reusable Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle" (Press release). SpaceX. 8 September 2005. Archived from the original on 15 August 2008.
  • "SpaceX Conducts First Multi-Engine Firing of Falcon 9 Rocket" (Press release). SpaceX. 18 January 2008. Archived from the original on 3 January 2010. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
  • "SpaceX successfully conducts full mission-length firing of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle" (Press release). SpaceX. 23 November 2008. Archived from the original on 9 February 2009. Retrieved 24 November 2008.
  • "Updates". SpaceX. 25 February 2010. Archived from the original on 17 August 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
  • "Production at SpaceX". SpaceX. 24 September 2013. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  • "Falcon User's Guide" (PDF). SpaceX. April 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 December 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  • "Octaweb". SpaceX News. 12 April 2013. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
  • "Landing Legs". SpaceX News. 12 April 2013. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 2 August 2013. The Falcon Heavy first stage center core and boosters each carry landing legs, which will land each core safely on Earth after takeoff.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide, 2009" (PDF). SpaceX. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 3 February 2010.
  • "Octaweb". SpaceX. 29 July 2013. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
  • "Landing Legs". SpaceX. 29 July 2013. Archived from the original on 6 August 2013. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide, Rev. 2.0" (PDF). 21 October 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
  • "Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle Payload User's Guide" (PDF). 21 October 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  • "Updates: December 2007". Updates Archive. SpaceX. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 27 December 2012. "Once we have all nine engines and the stage working well as a system, we will extensively test the "engine out" capability. This includes explosive and fire testing of the barriers that separate the engines from each other and from the vehicle. ... It should be said that the failure modes we've seen to date on the test stand for the Merlin 1C are all relatively benign – the turbo pump, combustion chamber and nozzle do not rupture explosively even when subjected to extreme circumstances. We have seen the gas generator (that drives the turbo pump assembly) blow apart during a start sequence (there are no checks in place to prevent that from happening), but it is a small device, unlikely to cause major damage to its own engine, let alone the neighbouring ones. Even so, as with engine nacelles on commercial jets, the fire/explosive barriers will assume that the entire chamber blows apart in the worst possible way. The bottom close-out panels are designed to direct any force or flame downward, away from neighbouring engines and the stage itself. ... we've found that the Falcon 9's ability to withstand one or even multiple engine failures, just as commercial airliners do, and still complete its mission is a compelling selling point with customers. Apart from the Space Shuttle and Soyuz, none of the existing [2007] launch vehicles can afford to lose even a single thrust chamber without causing loss of mission".
  • "Falcon 9 Overview (2012)". SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
  • "Capabilities & Services (2013)". SpaceX. 28 November 2012. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013.
  • "Capabilities & Services (2014)". SpaceX. 28 November 2012. Archived from the original on 7 June 2014.
  • "Capabilities & Services (2016)". SpaceX. 24 March 2022. Archived from the original on 5 May 2016.
  • "Why the US can beat China: the facts about SpaceX costs". 4 May 2011. Archived from the original on 28 March 2013.

stackexchange.com

space.stackexchange.com

tass.ru

techcrunch.com

technologyreview.com

teslarati.com

thespacereview.com

  • Money, Stewart (12 March 2012). "Competition and the future of the EELV program (part 2)". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2014. "The government is the necessary anchor tenant for commercial cargo, but it's not sufficient to build a new economic ecosystem", says Scott Hubbard, an aeronautics researcher at Stanford University in California and former director of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
  • Foust, Jeff (22 August 2011). "New opportunities for smallsat launches". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 23 December 2011. Retrieved 27 September 2011. SpaceX ... developed prices for flying those secondary payloads ... A P-POD would cost between $200,000 and $325,000 for missions to LEO, or $350,000 to $575,000 for missions to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO). An ESPA-class satellite weighing up to 180 kilograms would cost $4–5 million for LEO missions and $7–9 million for GTO missions, he said.

thespaceshow.com

archived.thespaceshow.com

theverge.com

transterrestrial.com

  • Simburg, Rand (16 June 2010). "SpaceX Press Conference". Archived from the original on 18 December 2010. Retrieved 16 June 2010.. Musk quote: "We will never give up! Never! Reusability is one of the most important goals. If we become the biggest launch company in the world, making money hand over fist, but we're still not reusable, I will consider us to have failed".

twitter.com

universetoday.com

usatoday.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

x.com

youtube.com