Fan film (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Fan film" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
199th place
139th place
8th place
10th place
9th place
13th place
1,462nd place
1,223rd place
193rd place
152nd place
2,340th place
1,517th place
32nd place
21st place
98th place
75th place
low place
low place
93rd place
73rd place
92nd place
72nd place
456th place
300th place
22nd place
19th place
549th place
491st place
15th place
16th place
136th place
93rd place
333rd place
237th place
77th place
111th place
693rd place
418th place
low place
low place
86th place
85th place
415th place
327th place
8,570th place
5,097th place
6th place
6th place

1428elm.com

archive.org

archive.today

avclub.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bloody-disgusting.com

dreadcentral.com

facebook.com

fancinematoday.com

ghostarchive.org

hollywoodreporter.com

indiewire.com

instagram.com

kickstarter.com

latimes.com

mit.edu

web.mit.edu

npr.org

qut.edu.au

eprints.qut.edu.au

salon.com

screenrant.com

  • Holtreman, Vic (2004-07-23). "Sandy Collora's World's Finest trailer is out". Screenrant.com. Retrieved 2012-03-18.

tripod.com

spritzer93436.tripod.com

uproxx.com

web.archive.org

wipo.int

  • Rostama, Guilda (June 1, 2015). "Remix Culture and Amateur Creativity: A Copyright Dilemma". WIPO. Retrieved 2016-03-14. Canada is one of a few countries, if not the only one, to have introduced into its copyright law a new exception for non-commercial user-generated content. Article 29 of Canada's Copyright Modernization Act (2012) states that there is no infringement if: (i) the use is done solely for non-commercial purpose; (ii) the original source is mentioned; (iii) the individual has reasonable ground to believe that he or she is not infringing copyright; and (iv) the remix does not have a "substantial adverse effect" on the exploitation of the existing work.
  • Rostama, Guilda (June 1, 2015). "Remix Culture and Amateur Creativity: A Copyright Dilemma". WIPO. Retrieved 2016-03-14. in 2013 a district court ruled that copyright owners do not have the right to simply take down content before undertaking a legal analysis to determine whether the remixed work could fall under fair use, a concept in US copyright law which permits limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain the right holder's permission (US District Court, Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group, Case No. 5:07-cv-03783-JF, January 24, 2013).[...] Given the emergence of today's "remix" culture, and the legal uncertainty surrounding remixes and mash-ups, the time would appear to be ripe for policy makers to take a new look at copyright law.

wired.com

wizardofstonemountain.com

youtube.com