February 2010 Australian cyberattacks (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "February 2010 Australian cyberattacks" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
943rd place
564th place
786th place
558th place
132nd place
96th place
1,317th place
873rd place
1,216th place
797th place
163rd place
185th place
61st place
54th place
911th place
628th place
435th place
276th place
193rd place
152nd place
8th place
10th place
low place
low place
457th place
272nd place
36th place
33rd place
412th place
266th place
low place
low place
3,686th place
2,201st place
965th place
579th place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

brisbanetimes.com.au

google.com

heraldsun.com.au

ibtimes.com

independent.co.uk

nzherald.co.nz

pcworld.com

scmagazineuk.com

smh.com.au

digihub.smh.com.au

news.smh.com.au

stuff.co.nz

theage.com.au

theaustralian.com.au

theregister.co.uk

thetechherald.com

time.com

web.archive.org

wired.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • Hardy, Keiran. "Operation Titstorm: hacktivism or cyber-terrorism?". The University of New South Wales Law Journal. 33 (2). Australia: 474–502. ISSN 0313-0096.
  • Vaile, David. "Forward". The University of New South Wales Law Journal. 33 (2). Australia: 428. ISSN 0313-0096. Keiran Hardy assesses Operation Titstorm' – an online protest against Australia's proposed internet filter – as an act of terrorism, arguing that the embarrassing (for the federal police) but essentially harmless offensive, is caught by Commonwealth terrorism provisions, so widely drafted are these offences borne in the often scrutiny-free territory of the 'war on terror'.11 This is problematic, he argues, because it leaves no place for legitimate acts of online protest, or at least sets the penalty far too high for relatively minor cybervandalism.

zdnet.com