Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Fermat's Last Theorem" in English language version.
Frey's suggestion, in the notation of the following theorem, was to show that the (hypothetical) elliptic curve y2 = x(x + up)(x – vp) could not be modular.
Our proof generalizes the known implication "effective ABC [right arrow] eventual Fermat" which was the original motivation for the ABC conjecture
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)Frey's suggestion, in the notation of the following theorem, was to show that the (hypothetical) elliptic curve y2 = x(x + up)(x – vp) could not be modular.
Frey's suggestion, in the notation of the following theorem, was to show that the (hypothetical) elliptic curve y2 = x(x + up)(x – vp) could not be modular.
Frey's suggestion, in the notation of the following theorem, was to show that the (hypothetical) elliptic curve y2 = x(x + up)(x – vp) could not be modular.
Frey's suggestion, in the notation of the following theorem, was to show that the (hypothetical) elliptic curve y2 = x(x + up)(x – vp) could not be modular.