Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
696th place
428th place
332nd place
246th place
6th place
6th place
193rd place
152nd place
low place
low place
918th place
556th place
446th place
308th place
2,387th place
1,479th place
1,697th place
1,040th place
8,780th place
5,894th place
3rd place
3rd place
5th place
5th place
175th place
137th place
7th place
7th place
3,811th place
2,160th place
9,177th place
5,024th place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,482nd place
3,140th place
703rd place
501st place
529th place
314th place
310th place
208th place
92nd place
72nd place
79th place
65th place

aclu.org

archive.org

archives.gov

books.google.com

  • Greaves, Richard L. (1981). "Legal Problems". Society and religion in Elizabethan England. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 649, 681. ISBN 0-8166-1030-4. OCLC 7278140. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2009. This situation worsened in the 1580s and 1590s when the machinery of ... the High Commission, was turned against Puritans ... in which a key weapon was the oath ex officio mero, with its capacity for self incrimination ... Refusal to take this oath usually was regarded as proof of guilt.

boston.com

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

cybercrimereview.com

doi.org

  • Rotsztain, Diego A. (1996). "The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-incrimination and Fear of Foreign Prosecution". Columbia Law Review. 96 (7): 1940–1972. doi:10.2307/1123297. JSTOR 1123297.

federalistblog.us

fedsoc.org

house.gov

oversight.house.gov

jstor.org

  • Rotsztain, Diego A. (1996). "The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-incrimination and Fear of Foreign Prosecution". Columbia Law Review. 96 (7): 1940–1972. doi:10.2307/1123297. JSTOR 1123297.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

  • "United States v. Cotton 535 U.S. 625 (2002), at 634". Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 20, 2002. Archived from the original on December 17, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2023.
  • United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)
  • Duke v. United States, 301 U.S. 492 (1937)
  • Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987)
  • Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 517 (1884)
  • Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885)
  • Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001), citing Hoffman v. U.S., 351 U.S. 479 (1951); cf. Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892)
  • Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001).
  • 570 U.S. 12-246 (2013).
  • Michael J. Z. Mannheimer, "Ripeness of Self-Incrimination Clause Disputes", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 95, No. 4, p. 1261, footnote 1 (Northwestern Univ. School of Law 2005), citing Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).
  • McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34 (1924).
  • U.S. v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1 (1970).
  • Braswell v. U.S., 487 U.S. 99 (1988).
  • 380 U.S. 609 (1965)
  • "Boyd v. United States :: 116 U.S. 616 (1886) :: Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center". Justia Law. Archived from the original on 2011-10-20. Retrieved 2011-01-15.
  • 274 U.S. 259 (1927).
  • 424 U.S. 648 (1976).
  • 406 U.S. 441 (1972).
  • "Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), at 434". Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 24, 1994. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2020. There is, however, a vast difference between arbitrary grants of freedom and arbitrary deprivations of liberty or property. The Due Process Clause has nothing to say about the former, but its whole purpose is to prevent the latter.
  • "Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934)". Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1934. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2020.

justice.gov

  • US Department of Justice (January 2013). "Types of federal forfeiture". United States Department of Justice. Archived from the original on March 8, 2015. Retrieved October 14, 2014. ... (Source: A Guide to Equitable Sharing of Federally Forfeited Property for State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, U.S. Department of Justice, March 1994)
  • Craig Gaumer; Assistant United States Attorney; Southern District of Iowa (November 2007). "A Prosecutor's Secret Weapon: Federal Civil Forfeiture Law" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 9, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2014. November 2007 Volume 55 Number 6 '... One of the main advantages of civil forfeiture is that it has less stringent standards for obtaining a seizure warrant ...' see pages 60, 71 ...

natlawreview.com

nd.edu

scholarship.law.nd.edu

npr.org

  • John Burnett (June 16, 2008). "Seized Drug Assets Pad Police Budgets". NPR. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2014. ... Every year, about $12 billion in drug profits returns to Mexico from the world's largest narcotics market—the United States. ...

nytimes.com

scholar.google.com

ssrn.com

  • Michael Allan Wolf, Superfluous Judicial Activism: The Takings Gloss, 91 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 287 (2023) - Available at SSRN: SSRN 4478379

supremecourt.gov

udayton.edu

campus.udayton.edu

vice.com

volokh.com

web.archive.org

wired.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • Greaves, Richard L. (1981). "Legal Problems". Society and religion in Elizabethan England. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 649, 681. ISBN 0-8166-1030-4. OCLC 7278140. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2009. This situation worsened in the 1580s and 1590s when the machinery of ... the High Commission, was turned against Puritans ... in which a key weapon was the oath ex officio mero, with its capacity for self incrimination ... Refusal to take this oath usually was regarded as proof of guilt.

wsj.com