Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
696th place
428th place
332nd place
246th place
6th place
6th place
193rd place
152nd place
918th place
556th place
446th place
308th place
2,387th place
1,479th place
1,697th place
1,040th place
8,780th place
5,894th place
3rd place
3rd place
5th place
5th place
175th place
137th place
7th place
7th place
3,811th place
2,160th place
9,177th place
5,024th place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,275th place
1,288th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,482nd place
3,140th place
703rd place
501st place
163rd place
185th place
529th place
314th place
310th place
208th place
92nd place
72nd place
79th place
65th place

aclu.org (Global: 5,482nd place; English: 3,140th place)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

archives.gov (Global: 446th place; English: 308th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

  • Greaves, Richard L. (1981). "Legal Problems". Society and religion in Elizabethan England. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 649, 681. ISBN 0-8166-1030-4. OCLC 7278140. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2009. This situation worsened in the 1580s and 1590s when the machinery of ... the High Commission, was turned against Puritans ... in which a key weapon was the oath ex officio mero, with its capacity for self incrimination ... Refusal to take this oath usually was regarded as proof of guilt.

boston.com (Global: 310th place; English: 208th place)

cornell.edu (Global: 332nd place; English: 246th place)

law.cornell.edu

cybercrimereview.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

  • Rotsztain, Diego A. (1996). "The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-incrimination and Fear of Foreign Prosecution". Columbia Law Review. 96 (7): 1940–1972. doi:10.2307/1123297. JSTOR 1123297.

federalistblog.us (Global: low place; English: low place)

fedsoc.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

google.com (Global: 163rd place; English: 185th place)

house.gov (Global: 529th place; English: 314th place)

oversight.house.gov

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; English: 20th place)

  • Rotsztain, Diego A. (1996). "The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-incrimination and Fear of Foreign Prosecution". Columbia Law Review. 96 (7): 1940–1972. doi:10.2307/1123297. JSTOR 1123297.

justia.com (Global: 696th place; English: 428th place)

supreme.justia.com

  • "United States v. Cotton 535 U.S. 625 (2002), at 634". Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 20, 2002. Archived from the original on December 17, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2023.
  • United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)
  • Duke v. United States, 301 U.S. 492 (1937)
  • Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987)
  • Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 517 (1884)
  • Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885)
  • Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001), citing Hoffman v. U.S., 351 U.S. 479 (1951); cf. Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892)
  • Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001).
  • 570 U.S. 12-246 (2013).
  • Michael J. Z. Mannheimer, "Ripeness of Self-Incrimination Clause Disputes", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 95, No. 4, p. 1261, footnote 1 (Northwestern Univ. School of Law 2005), citing Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).
  • McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34 (1924).
  • U.S. v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1 (1970).
  • Braswell v. U.S., 487 U.S. 99 (1988).
  • 380 U.S. 609 (1965)
  • "Boyd v. United States :: 116 U.S. 616 (1886) :: Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center". Justia Law. Archived from the original on 2011-10-20. Retrieved 2011-01-15.
  • 274 U.S. 259 (1927).
  • 424 U.S. 648 (1976).
  • 406 U.S. 441 (1972).
  • "Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), at 434". Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 24, 1994. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2020. There is, however, a vast difference between arbitrary grants of freedom and arbitrary deprivations of liberty or property. The Due Process Clause has nothing to say about the former, but its whole purpose is to prevent the latter.
  • "Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 479 (2005)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2025-05-07.
  • "Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934)". Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1934. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  • "Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2025-05-07.
  • "Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2025-05-07.

justice.gov (Global: 918th place; English: 556th place)

  • US Department of Justice (January 2013). "Types of federal forfeiture". United States Department of Justice. Archived from the original on March 8, 2015. Retrieved October 14, 2014. ... (Source: A Guide to Equitable Sharing of Federally Forfeited Property for State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, U.S. Department of Justice, March 1994)
  • Craig Gaumer; Assistant United States Attorney; Southern District of Iowa (November 2007). "A Prosecutor's Secret Weapon: Federal Civil Forfeiture Law" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 9, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2014. November 2007 Volume 55 Number 6 '... One of the main advantages of civil forfeiture is that it has less stringent standards for obtaining a seizure warrant ...' see pages 60, 71 ...

natlawreview.com (Global: 9,177th place; English: 5,024th place)

nd.edu (Global: 2,387th place; English: 1,479th place)

scholarship.law.nd.edu

npr.org (Global: 92nd place; English: 72nd place)

  • John Burnett (June 16, 2008). "Seized Drug Assets Pad Police Budgets". NPR. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2014. ... Every year, about $12 billion in drug profits returns to Mexico from the world's largest narcotics market—the United States. ...

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

scholar.google.com (Global: 1,697th place; English: 1,040th place)

ssrn.com (Global: 703rd place; English: 501st place)

papers.ssrn.com

  • Michael Allan Wolf, Superfluous Judicial Activism: The Takings Gloss, 91 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 287 (2023) - Available at SSRN: SSRN 4478379

supremecourt.gov (Global: 3,811th place; English: 2,160th place)

udayton.edu (Global: 8,780th place; English: 5,894th place)

campus.udayton.edu

uscourts.gov (Global: 2,275th place; English: 1,288th place)

media.ca11.uscourts.gov

  • In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, Nos. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. 2012-02-23) ("We hold that Doe properly invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege. In response, the Government chose not give him the immunity the Fifth Amendment and 18 U.S.C. § 6002 mandate, and the district court acquiesced. Stripped of Fifth Amendment protection, Doe refused to produce the unencrypted contents of the hard drives. The refusal was justified, and the district court erred in adjudging him in civil contempt. The district court’s judgment is accordingly REVERSED.").

vice.com (Global: 175th place; English: 137th place)

volokh.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wired.com (Global: 193rd place; English: 152nd place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Greaves, Richard L. (1981). "Legal Problems". Society and religion in Elizabethan England. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 649, 681. ISBN 0-8166-1030-4. OCLC 7278140. Archived from the original on 29 April 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2009. This situation worsened in the 1580s and 1590s when the machinery of ... the High Commission, was turned against Puritans ... in which a key weapon was the oath ex officio mero, with its capacity for self incrimination ... Refusal to take this oath usually was regarded as proof of guilt.

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; English: 65th place)