First Catilinarian conspiracy (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "First Catilinarian conspiracy" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

18worldcat.org

5^th place

13jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

10doi.org

2^nd place

6brill.com

1,840^th place

1,115^th place

4semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

4uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

1livius.org

2,000^th place

1,766^th place

1biblioscout.net

low place

biblioscout.net

Woodman, Anthony J (2021). "Sallust and Catiline: conspiracy theories". Historia. 70 (1): 55–68. doi:10.25162/historia-2021-0003. ISSN 0018-2311. S2CID 230569776. The first Catilinarian conspiracy is dismissed by almost every modern historian.

books.google.com

Wiseman, TP (1992). "The senate and the populares". In Crook, JA; et al. (eds.). Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 9 (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 342. ISBN 0-521-25603-8.
Syme 2002, p. 90. Syme, Ronald (2002) [1964]. "The credulity of Sallust". Sallust (First paperback ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 83–103. ISBN 9780520929104.
Berry, DH (2020). Cicero's Catilinarians. New York. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-751081-0. OCLC 1126348418. The "first Catilinarian conspiracy" was accepted at face value by ancient and modern historians alike until the myth was exploded by Robin Seager and Ronald Syme (independently) in 1964.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

brill.com

McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Mur. 81. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 10 et seq. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Mur. 81. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 10 et seq. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Cat. 1.15. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 51. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.

doi.org

Gruen 1969, p. 20. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Mur. 81. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 10 et seq. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Mur. 81. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 10 et seq. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Cat. 1.15. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
McGushin 1977, p. 298, citing Cic. Sull. 51. McGushin, P (1977). "The conspiracy of 66 BC". Bellum Catilinae: a commentary. Mnemosyne Supplements. Vol. 45. Brill. pp. 298–301. doi:10.1163/9789004327627_007. ISBN 978-9-0043-2762-7.
Woodman, Anthony J (2021). "Sallust and Catiline: conspiracy theories". Historia. 70 (1): 55–68. doi:10.25162/historia-2021-0003. ISSN 0018-2311. S2CID 230569776. The first Catilinarian conspiracy is dismissed by almost every modern historian.
Gruen 1969, p. 21. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Gruen 1969, p. 24. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.

jstor.org

Gruen 1969, p. 20. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Seager 1964, p. 342, citing Sall. Cat., 18.7. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844. Sallust (1921) [1st century BC]. "Bellum Catilinae". Sallust. Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Rolfe, John C. Cambridge: Harvard University Press – via LacusCurtius.
Seager 1964, p. 342, citing Dio 36.44.3 et seq. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Phillips 1976, p. 441. Phillips, EJ (1976). "Catiline's Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 25 (4): 441–448. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435521.
Phillips 1976, p. 441. "It is clear that so-called First Catilinarian conspiracy... is fictitious". Phillips, EJ (1976). "Catiline's Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 25 (4): 441–448. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435521.
Waters, K. H. (1970). "Cicero, Sallust and Catiline". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 19 (2): 195–215. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435130. I shall not discuss the once believed-in "First Catilinarian conspiracy", a phantom now, it is to be hoped, exorcised for ever.
Seager 1964, p. 338 n. 1. "It is now widely held that the conspiracy is wholly fictitious". Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Gruen 1969, p. 21. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Seager 1964, p. 342. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, pp. 342–43. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, p. 344. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, p. 346. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Gruen 1969, p. 24. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.

livius.org

Livy Per., 101.3 (coniuratio eorum qui in petitione consulatus ambitus damnati erant facta de interficiendis consulibus obpressa est). Livy (2003). Periochae. Translated by Lendering, Jona – via Livius.org.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Gruen 1969, p. 20. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Woodman, Anthony J (2021). "Sallust and Catiline: conspiracy theories". Historia. 70 (1): 55–68. doi:10.25162/historia-2021-0003. ISSN 0018-2311. S2CID 230569776. The first Catilinarian conspiracy is dismissed by almost every modern historian.
Gruen 1969, p. 21. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Gruen 1969, p. 24. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.

uchicago.edu

journals.uchicago.edu

Gruen 1969, p. 20. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Gruen 1969, p. 21. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Gruen 1969, p. 24. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.

penelope.uchicago.edu

Seager 1964, p. 342, citing Sall. Cat., 18.7. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844. Sallust (1921) [1st century BC]. "Bellum Catilinae". Sallust. Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Rolfe, John C. Cambridge: Harvard University Press – via LacusCurtius.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Wilson 2021, p. 304. Wilson, Mark (2021). Dictator: the Evolution of the Roman dictatorship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-12920-1. OCLC 1243162549.
Gruen 1969, p. 20. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Seager 1964, p. 342, citing Sall. Cat., 18.7. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844. Sallust (1921) [1st century BC]. "Bellum Catilinae". Sallust. Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Rolfe, John C. Cambridge: Harvard University Press – via LacusCurtius.
Wilson 2021, p. 303 n. 1. Wilson, Mark (2021). Dictator: the Evolution of the Roman dictatorship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-12920-1. OCLC 1243162549.
Wilson 2021, p. 304, citing Suet. Iul. 9.1. Wilson, Mark (2021). Dictator: the Evolution of the Roman dictatorship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-12920-1. OCLC 1243162549.
Seager 1964, p. 342, citing Dio 36.44.3 et seq. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Phillips 1976, p. 441. Phillips, EJ (1976). "Catiline's Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 25 (4): 441–448. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435521.
Woodman, Anthony J (2021). "Sallust and Catiline: conspiracy theories". Historia. 70 (1): 55–68. doi:10.25162/historia-2021-0003. ISSN 0018-2311. S2CID 230569776. The first Catilinarian conspiracy is dismissed by almost every modern historian.
Phillips 1976, p. 441. "It is clear that so-called First Catilinarian conspiracy... is fictitious". Phillips, EJ (1976). "Catiline's Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 25 (4): 441–448. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435521.
Waters, K. H. (1970). "Cicero, Sallust and Catiline". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 19 (2): 195–215. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4435130. I shall not discuss the once believed-in "First Catilinarian conspiracy", a phantom now, it is to be hoped, exorcised for ever.
Seager 1964, p. 338 n. 1. "It is now widely held that the conspiracy is wholly fictitious". Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Gruen 1969, p. 21. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.
Berry, DH (2020). Cicero's Catilinarians. New York. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-751081-0. OCLC 1126348418. The "first Catilinarian conspiracy" was accepted at face value by ancient and modern historians alike until the myth was exploded by Robin Seager and Ronald Syme (independently) in 1964.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Seager 1964, p. 342. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, pp. 342–43. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, p. 344. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Seager 1964, p. 346. Seager, Robin (1964). "The First Catilinarian Conspiracy". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 13 (3): 338–347. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4434844.
Gruen 1969, p. 24. Gruen, Erich S (1969). "Notes on the "First Catilinarian Conspiracy"". Classical Philology. 64 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1086/365439. ISSN 0009-837X. JSTOR 268006. S2CID 162267188.