Free will in theology (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Free will in theology" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
2,877th place
1,532nd place
281st place
448th place
6th place
6th place
487th place
842nd place
low place
low place
8,334th place
8,379th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
826th place
452nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,710th place
3,378th place
low place
low place
1,840th place
1,115th place
2nd place
2nd place
7,099th place
4,646th place
1,306th place
885th place
5,283rd place
4,059th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
471st place
409th place
low place
low place
4,784th place
3,078th place
low place
low place
209th place
191st place
low place
9,417th place
low place
low place
1,688th place
1,180th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
low place
9,403rd place
low place
low place
3,751st place
2,758th place
low place
low place
7,540th place
5,351st place
6,651st place
4,464th place
1,019th place
784th place
3,575th place
2,153rd place

ais.org

umcc.ais.org

  • Watt, Montgomery. Free-Will and Predestination in Early Islam. Luzac & Co.: London 1948.; Wolfson, Harry. The Philosophy of Kalam, 1976 Harvard University Press and "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-08-23. Retrieved 2006-08-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

aish.com

al-islam.org

antiochian.net

  • The Orthodox, I discovered, objected to the Roman Catholic understanding of original sin as the stain of inherited guilt passed down from Adam, as a result of his sin, to the rest of the human race. The Orthodox saw this notion of original sin as skewed, drawing almost exclusively on the thought of Saint Augustine. He had virtually ignored the teachings of the Eastern Fathers, who tended to see original sin not as inherited guilt but rather as "the ancestral curse" by which human beings were alienated from the divine life and thus became subject to corruption and death. As I read further, I discovered that Saint Augustine's and consequently, the Roman Catholic Church's view was the result of the faulty Latin translation of Romans 5:12, the New Testament passage on which the teaching of original sin is based. When the original Greek is properly translated it reads, "Therefore, as sin came into the world through one man and death through sin, and death spread to all in that (eph ho) all sinned. . ." The Latin which Augustine used rendered the eph ho ("in that") as in > quo ("in whom"), meaning "in Adam." Thus the passage was misconstrued as saying that all sinned in Adam, that all shared in the guilt of his original disobedience. It is understandable how the Roman Catholic doctrine of original sin followed from this misinterpretation. It is also easy to see why the Orthodox rejected the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Because they understood original sin in terms of the ancestral curse of human mortality, they saw Pius IX's dogma as amounting to no less than an assertion of Mary's immortality! That is, by saying that Mary was free from original sin, the Roman Church in effect was saying that Mary was not mortal! She was therefore not like the rest of the human race. This was something no Orthodox Christian could accept. In fact, Orthodoxy calls Mary "the first of the redeemed", the first human to receive the great blessing of salvation now available to all mankind. Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism - What are the differences - Father Theodore Pulcini ISBN 978-1-888212-23-5 "Church of Antioch - Orthodoxy and Catholicism". Archived from the original on 2011-07-17. Retrieved 2010-09-22.

archive.org

archive.today

  • Bhagavad-Gita 3.27 Archived 2012-07-07 at archive.today "The spirit soul bewildered by the influence of false ego thinks himself the doer of activities that are in actuality carried out by the three modes of material nature"

astrologyforthesoul.com

bc.edu

escholarship.bc.edu

bhagavadgitaasitis.com

biblegateway.com

biblica.com

bookofconcord.com

bookofconcord.org

books.google.com

brill.com

brynmawr.edu

bmcr.brynmawr.edu

ccel.org

cuhcs.org.uk

  • Cambridge University HCS Archived 2007-02-03 at the Wayback Machine "Since Hinduism is itself a conglomerate of religions, an attitude of tolerance and acceptance of the validity of other belief systems has long been a part of Hindu thought."

docplayer.it

doi.org

himalayanacademy.com

  • Himalayan Academy "Hindus believe in karma, the law of cause and effect by which each individual creates his own destiny by his thoughts, words and deeds"

jbburnett.com

  • In no sense is this a Pelagian or Semi-Pelagian position. The balanced synergistic doctrine of the early and Eastern Church, a doctrine misunderstood and undermined by Latin Christianity in general from St. Augustine on— although there was always opposition to this in the Latin Church— always understood that God initiates, accompanies, and completes everything in the process of salvation. The Ascetic Ideal and the New Testament: Reflections on the Critique of the Theology of the Reformation Georges Florovsky [2]
  • The existential and ontological meaning of man's created existence is precisely that God did not have to create, that it was a free act of Divine freedom. But— and here is the great difficulty created by an unbalanced Christianity on the doctrine of grace and freedom— in freely creating man God willed to give man an inner spiritual freedom. In no sense is this a Pelagian or Semi-Pelagian position. The balanced synergistic doctrine of the early and Eastern Church, a doctrine misunderstood and undermined by Latin Christianity in general from St. Augustine on— although there was always opposition to this in the Latin Church— always understood that God initiates, accompanies, and completes everything in the process of salvation. What it always rejected— both spontaneously and intellectually— is the idea of irresistible grace, the idea that man has no participating role in his salvation. The Ascetic Ideal and the New Testament: Reflections on the Critique of the Theology of the Reformation Georges Florovsky [5]

jewishencyclopedia.com

lcms.org

mb-soft.com

  • Council of Orange local Council, never accepted in the East, 529 AD Convened regarding Pelagianism. Condemned various beliefs of Pelagianism: that humans are unaffected by Adam's sin, that a person's move towards God can begin without grace, that an increase of faith can be attained apart from grace, that salvation can be attained apart from the Holy Spirit, that man's free will can be restored from its destruction apart from baptism, that 'merit' may precede grace, that man can do good and attain salvation without God's help, Statement we must, under the blessing of God, preach and believe as follows. The sin of the first man has so impaired and weakened free will that no one thereafter can either love God as he ought or believe in God or do good for God's sake, unless the grace of divine mercy has preceded him....According to the Roman Catholic faith we also believe that after grace has been received through baptism, all baptized persons have the ability and responsibility, if they desire to labor faithfully, to perform with the aid and cooperation of Christ what is of essential importance in regard to the salvation of their soul. We not only do not believe that any are foreordained to evil by the power of God, but even state with utter abhorrence that if there are those who want to believe so evil a thing, they are anathema. We also believe and confess to our benefit that in every good work it is not we who take the initiative and are then assisted through the mercy of God, but God himself first inspires in us both faith in him and love for him without any previous good works of our own that deserve reward, so that we may both faithfully seek the sacrament of baptism, and after baptism be able by his help to do what is pleasing to him. [1]

merriam-webster.com

mtholyoke.edu

  • Robert Kane, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, (Oxford, 2005), 10 and Fischer, J., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M., Four Views on Free Will (Blackwell, 2007), 128 and R. Eric Barnes, "PHIL 101: Free Will Debate Topic". Archived from the original on 2005-02-16. Retrieved 2009-10-19. (accessed October 19, 2009).

newadvent.org

  • Yet Cassian did not himself escape the suspicion of erroneous teaching; he is in fact regarded as the originator of what, since the Middle Ages, has been known as Semipelagianism. The New Advent the Catholic Encyclopedia online [4]

ocf.org

  • So far Roman Catholicism agrees with the Church; it differs with Orthodoxy on the nature of man's fall and the human condition. Following Augustine of Hippo, the Latins teach that Adam and Eve sinned against God. The guilt of their sin has been inherited by every man, woman and child after them. All humanity is liable for their "original sin." WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ORTHODOXY AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM? by Father Michael Azkoul [3] Archived 2004-06-03 at the Wayback Machine

opentheism.info

oremus.org

bible.oremus.org

  • We receive the grace of Christ in the Holy Spirit, and without the Holy Spirit no one can have faith in Christ (1 Cor. 12:3), and as Saint Cyril of Alexandria said: "It is unworkable for the soul of man to achieve any of the goods, namely, to control its own passions and to escape the mightiness of the sharp trap of the devil, unless he is fortified by the grace of the Holy Spirit and on this count he has Christ himself in his soul" (Against Julian, 3)
  • Ephesians 1:19, Colossians 2:12, John 1:13, John 6:26, 2 Corinthians 5:17

papalencyclicals.net

ramakrishnavivekananda.info

sefaria.org

sefaria.org.il

stpaulsirvine.org

  • "When Catholics say that persons cooperate in preparing for an accepting justification by consenting to God's justifying action, they see such personal consent as itself an effect of grace, not as an action arising from innate human abilities" "Beyond Justification". Archived from the original on 2010-11-30. Retrieved 2010-07-16.

sunnah.com

sussex.ac.uk

lifesci.sussex.ac.uk

thesaurus.com

tomblackson.com

ucl.ac.uk

vatican.va

vedabase.com

vedabase.net

  • B-Gita 15.7 purport "As fragmental parts and parcels of the Supreme Lord, the living entities also have fragmental portions of His qualities, of which independence is one. Every living entity, as an individual Self, has his personal individuality and a minute form of independence. By misuse of that independence one becomes a conditioned Self, and by proper use of independence he is always liberated"

web.archive.org

wheaton.edu

wlsessays.net

  • Mueller, J.T., Christian Dogmatics. Concordia Publishing House: 1934. pp. 190 and Edward. W. A.,A Short Explanation of Dr. Martin Luther's Small Catechism. Concordia Publishing House. 1946. p. 165. and Divine Providence and Human Adversity Archived 2010-07-07 at the Wayback Machine by Markus O. Koepsell

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org