Geoffrey Chaucer (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Geoffrey Chaucer" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

15doi.org

2^nd place

10semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

9books.google.com

3^rd place

7jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

7web.archive.org

1^st place

5archive.org

6^th place

3uwm.edu

7,852^nd place

4,764^th place

3rochester.edu

2,691^st place

1,948^th place

2cambridge.org

305^th place

264^th place

2theguardian.com

12^th place

11^th place

1historyextra.com

6,615^th place

4,325^th place

1oxfordreference.com

938^th place

658^th place

1measuringworth.com

2,465^th place

1,383^rd place

1nationalarchives.gov.uk

744^th place

547^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1westminster-abbey.org

4,424^th place

3,507^th place

1christianitytoday.com

2,002^nd place

1,199^th place

1enotes.com

3,553^rd place

2,678^th place

1bl.uk

1,234^th place

779^th place

1smithsonianmag.com

503^rd place

364^th place

1virginia.edu

1,041^st place

733^rd place

1utsa.edu

low place

9,359^th place

1researchgate.net

120^th place

125^th place

1ucla.edu

782^nd place

585^th place

1uoregon.edu

3,144^th place

2,101^st place

1academia.edu

121^st place

142^nd place

1oxforddnb.com

284^th place

187^th place

1uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

academia.edu

Besserman, Lawrence (2006). The Chaucer Review. Penn State University Press. pp. 100–103.

archive.org

Nicolas, Sir N. Harris (1832). The controversy between Sir Richard Scrope and Sir Robert Grosvenor, in the Court of Chivalry. Vol. II. London. p. 404. Retrieved 2 June 2014.
Chaucer, Geoffrey (1984). "The Legend of Good Women". In Benson, Larry D.; Pratt, Robert; Robinson, F. N. (eds.). The Riverside Chaucer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. p. 600. ISBN 978-0-395-29031-6.
Wilcockson, Colin (1987). "Explanatory Notes on 'The Book of the Duchess'". In Benson, Larry D.; Pratt, Robert; Robinson, F. N. (eds.). The Riverside Chaucer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 966–976. ISBN 978-0-395-29031-6.
Gross, Zaila (1987). "Introduction to the Short Poems". In Benson, Larry D.; Pratt, Robert; Robinson, F. N. (eds.). The Riverside Chaucer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. p. 635. ISBN 978-0-395-29031-6.
Bloom, Harold (1994). The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace. p. 226. ISBN 0-15-195747-9.

bl.uk

"William Caxton's illustrated second edition of The Canterbury Tales". British Library. Archived from the original on 23 July 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2021.

books.google.com

Simpson, James (27 April 2023). "Literary Traditions – Continuity and Change". The Oxford History of Poetry in English: Volume 3. Medieval Poetry: 1400–1500. Oxford University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-19-883968-2.
Lerer, Seth (1 January 2006). The Yale Companion to Chaucer. Yale University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-300-12597-9.
Echard, Sian; Rouse, Robert (2017). The Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain, 4 Volume Set. John Wiley & Sons. p. 425. ISBN 9781118396988. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
Derek Brewer (1992). Chaucer and His World. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-85991-366-9.
Marion Turner (9 April 2019). Chaucer: A European Life. Princeton University Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-691-16009-2.
Power, Eileen (1988). Medieval English Nunneries, c. 1275 to 1535. Biblo & Tannen Publishers. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-8196-0140-7. Retrieved 19 December 2007.
Coulton, G. G. (2006). Chaucer and His England. Kessinger Publishing. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4286-4247-8. Retrieved 19 December 2007.
Thomas Tyrwhitt, ed. (1822). "Introductory Discourse to the Canterbury Tales". The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer. W. Pickering and R. and S. Prowett. p. 126 note 15. ISBN 978-0-8482-2624-4.
Brewer, Derek, ed. (1978). Chaucer: The Critical Heritage. Volume 1: 1385–1837. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 230. ISBN 978-0-7100-8497-2. Retrieved 18 May 2014.

cambridge.org

"Geoffrey Chaucer in Context". Cambridge University Press. 2019. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
"Chaucer". Cambridge University Press. 2011. Retrieved 20 April 2020.

christianitytoday.com

"Geoffrey Chaucer". Christian History | Learn the History of Christianity & the Church. 8 August 2008.

doi.org

Briggs, Keith (June 2019). "The Malins in Chaucer's Ipswich Ancestry". Notes and Queries. 66 (2): 201–202. doi:10.1093/notesj/gjz004.
Schwebel, Leah (2014). "The Legend of Thebes and Literary Patricide in Chaucer, Boccaccio, and Statius". Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 36 (1): 139–68. doi:10.1353/sac.2014.0028. S2CID 194954865.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 420. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 407-410. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 424. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 407-411. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger, Euan; Prescott, Andrew (1 October 2022). "The Archival Iceberg: New Sources for Literary Life-Records". The Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 498–526. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0498. S2CID 252860263.
Scott, F. R. (1943). "Chaucer and the Parliament of 1386". Speculum. 18 (1): 80–86. doi:10.2307/2853640. JSTOR 2853640. OCLC 25967434. S2CID 159965790.
Weiskott, Eric (1 January 2013). "Chaucer the Forester: The Friar's Tale, Forest History, and Officialdom". The Chaucer Review. 47 (3): 323–336. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. JSTOR 10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. S2CID 162585929.
Smith, Jeremy J. (1995). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of The Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". The Modern Language Review. 90 (2): 405–406. doi:10.2307/3734556. JSTOR 3734556.
Blake, N. F. (1996). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of The Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". The Review of English Studies. 47 (186): 233–34. doi:10.1093/res/XLVII.186.233. JSTOR 518116.
Mooney, Linne R. (1996). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of the Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". Speculum. 71 (1): 197–98. doi:10.2307/2865248. JSTOR 2865248.
Oruch, Jack B. (July 1981). "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February". Speculum. 56 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 534–565. doi:10.2307/2847741. JSTOR 2847741. S2CID 162849518. Oruch's survey of the literature finds no association between Valentine and romance prior to Chaucer. He concludes that Chaucer is likely to be "the original mythmaker in this instance". "Imagery, Iconography, and Mythography". colfa.utsa.edu. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
Cannon, Christopher (1996). "The Myth of Origin and the Making of Chaucer's English". Speculum. 71 (3). University of Chicago Press: 646–675. doi:10.2307/2865797. JSTOR 2865797. S2CID 161798842.
Carlyle, E. I.; Edwards, A. S. G. (reviewer) (2004). "Urry, John (1666–1715)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/28021. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

enotes.com

"Was Chaucer in favor of the church or opposed to it? – eNotes". eNotes.

historyextra.com

Butterfield, Ardis. "Chaucer and the idea of Englishness". History Extra. Retrieved 22 May 2022. The extraordinary dominance of English now as a world language has made it hard to appreciate that its status in the medieval period was very low. Not only was English just one of three languages used in England before the 15th century, it was not the major one. Although it was, of course, the most widely used spoken language, English fell far short of Latin and French as a written language. [Chaucer's] decision to write exclusively in English was indeed unusual [...] He made English successful because he made it urban and international.

jstor.org

Scott, F. R. (1943). "Chaucer and the Parliament of 1386". Speculum. 18 (1): 80–86. doi:10.2307/2853640. JSTOR 2853640. OCLC 25967434. S2CID 159965790.
Weiskott, Eric (1 January 2013). "Chaucer the Forester: The Friar's Tale, Forest History, and Officialdom". The Chaucer Review. 47 (3): 323–336. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. JSTOR 10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. S2CID 162585929.
Smith, Jeremy J. (1995). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of The Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". The Modern Language Review. 90 (2): 405–406. doi:10.2307/3734556. JSTOR 3734556.
Blake, N. F. (1996). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of The Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". The Review of English Studies. 47 (186): 233–34. doi:10.1093/res/XLVII.186.233. JSTOR 518116.
Mooney, Linne R. (1996). "Reviewed Work(s): The Authorship of the Equatorie of the Planetis by Kari Anne Rand Schmidt". Speculum. 71 (1): 197–98. doi:10.2307/2865248. JSTOR 2865248.
Oruch, Jack B. (July 1981). "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February". Speculum. 56 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 534–565. doi:10.2307/2847741. JSTOR 2847741. S2CID 162849518. Oruch's survey of the literature finds no association between Valentine and romance prior to Chaucer. He concludes that Chaucer is likely to be "the original mythmaker in this instance". "Imagery, Iconography, and Mythography". colfa.utsa.edu. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
Cannon, Christopher (1996). "The Myth of Origin and the Making of Chaucer's English". Speculum. 71 (3). University of Chicago Press: 646–675. doi:10.2307/2865797. JSTOR 2865797. S2CID 161798842.

measuringworth.com

UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 7 May 2024.

nationalarchives.gov.uk

blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022b). "Geoffrey Chaucer and Cecily Chaumpaigne: Rethinking the record". UK National Archives.

oxforddnb.com

Carlyle, E. I.; Edwards, A. S. G. (reviewer) (2004). "Urry, John (1666–1715)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/28021. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

oxfordreference.com

Hanks, Patrick; Coates, Richard; McClure, Peter, eds. (2016). "Chaucer". The Oxford Dictionary of Family Names in Britain and Ireland. Oxford UP. ISBN 978-0-19-967776-4.

researchgate.net

Fruoco, Jonathan (2018). "Chaucer et les origines de la Saint Valentin". Conference.

rochester.edu

lib.rochester.edu

Thomas Hoccleve, The Regiment of Princes, TEAMS website, University of Rochester, Robbins Library
Symons, Dana M., ed. (2004). "La Belle Dame sans Mercy: Introduction". Chaucerian Dream Visions and Complaints. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications.

d.lib.rochester.edu

Bowers, John M., ed. (1992). "The Ploughman's Tale: Introduction". The Canterbury Tales: Fifteenth-Century Continuations and Additions. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Schwebel, Leah (2014). "The Legend of Thebes and Literary Patricide in Chaucer, Boccaccio, and Statius". Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 36 (1): 139–68. doi:10.1353/sac.2014.0028. S2CID 194954865.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 420. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 407-410. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 424. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger & Sobecki 2022a, p. 407-411. Roger, Euan; Sobecki, Sebastian (2022a). "Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered". Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 407–437. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0407. S2CID 252866367.
Roger, Euan; Prescott, Andrew (1 October 2022). "The Archival Iceberg: New Sources for Literary Life-Records". The Chaucer Review. 57 (4): 498–526. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.57.4.0498. S2CID 252860263.
Scott, F. R. (1943). "Chaucer and the Parliament of 1386". Speculum. 18 (1): 80–86. doi:10.2307/2853640. JSTOR 2853640. OCLC 25967434. S2CID 159965790.
Weiskott, Eric (1 January 2013). "Chaucer the Forester: The Friar's Tale, Forest History, and Officialdom". The Chaucer Review. 47 (3): 323–336. doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. JSTOR 10.5325/chaucerrev.47.3.0323. S2CID 162585929.
Oruch, Jack B. (July 1981). "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February". Speculum. 56 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 534–565. doi:10.2307/2847741. JSTOR 2847741. S2CID 162849518. Oruch's survey of the literature finds no association between Valentine and romance prior to Chaucer. He concludes that Chaucer is likely to be "the original mythmaker in this instance". "Imagery, Iconography, and Mythography". colfa.utsa.edu. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
Cannon, Christopher (1996). "The Myth of Origin and the Making of Chaucer's English". Speculum. 71 (3). University of Chicago Press: 646–675. doi:10.2307/2865797. JSTOR 2865797. S2CID 161798842.

smithsonianmag.com

Katz, Brigit (5 February 2020). "A New App Guides Readers Through Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales'". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 25 April 2022.

theguardian.com

Alberge, Dalya (10 July 2023). "Geoffrey Chaucer note asking for time off work identified as his handwriting". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 July 2023.
Jordison, Sam (11 September 2018). "The Canterbury Tales: Chaucer's 'plein speke' is a raucous read". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 April 2022.

uchicago.edu

lib.uchicago.edu

"Guide to the Chaucer Research Project Records 1886–1965". Finding Aids – The Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center – The University of Chicago Library. Archived from the original on 30 May 2023.

ucla.edu

spotlight.ucla.edu

Meg Sullivan (February 1, 2001). "Henry Ansgar Kelly, Valentine's Day". UCLA Spotlight. Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.

uoregon.edu

"Chawcer undoubtedly did excellently in his Troilus and Creseid: of whome trulie I knowe not whether to mervaile more, either that hee in that mistie time could see so clearly, or that wee in this cleare age, goe so stumblingly after him." The text can be found at uoregon.edu

utsa.edu

colfa.utsa.edu

Oruch, Jack B. (July 1981). "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February". Speculum. 56 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 534–565. doi:10.2307/2847741. JSTOR 2847741. S2CID 162849518. Oruch's survey of the literature finds no association between Valentine and romance prior to Chaucer. He concludes that Chaucer is likely to be "the original mythmaker in this instance". "Imagery, Iconography, and Mythography". colfa.utsa.edu. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.

uwm.edu

"A Leaf from The Canterbury Tales". Westminster, England: William Caxton. 1473. Archived from the original on 31 October 2005.
"UWM.edu". Archived from the original on 11 November 2005.
"The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer: To Which are Added an Essay on his Language and Versification, and an Introductory Discourse, Together with Notes and a Glossary by the late Thomas Tyrwhitt. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1798. 2 Volumes". Archived from the original on 11 November 2005.

virginia.edu

etext.lib.virginia.edu

Original e-text available online at the University of Virginia website^{[permanent dead link‍]}, trans. Wikipedia.

web.archive.org

"William Caxton's illustrated second edition of The Canterbury Tales". British Library. Archived from the original on 23 July 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
Oruch, Jack B. (July 1981). "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February". Speculum. 56 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 534–565. doi:10.2307/2847741. JSTOR 2847741. S2CID 162849518. Oruch's survey of the literature finds no association between Valentine and romance prior to Chaucer. He concludes that Chaucer is likely to be "the original mythmaker in this instance". "Imagery, Iconography, and Mythography". colfa.utsa.edu. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
Meg Sullivan (February 1, 2001). "Henry Ansgar Kelly, Valentine's Day". UCLA Spotlight. Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.
"A Leaf from The Canterbury Tales". Westminster, England: William Caxton. 1473. Archived from the original on 31 October 2005.
"UWM.edu". Archived from the original on 11 November 2005.
"The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer: To Which are Added an Essay on his Language and Versification, and an Introductory Discourse, Together with Notes and a Glossary by the late Thomas Tyrwhitt. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1798. 2 Volumes". Archived from the original on 11 November 2005.
"Guide to the Chaucer Research Project Records 1886–1965". Finding Aids – The Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center – The University of Chicago Library. Archived from the original on 30 May 2023.

westminster-abbey.org

"Poets' Corner History". WestminsterAbbey.org. Retrieved 12 May 2020.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Scott, F. R. (1943). "Chaucer and the Parliament of 1386". Speculum. 18 (1): 80–86. doi:10.2307/2853640. JSTOR 2853640. OCLC 25967434. S2CID 159965790.