Google litigation (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Google litigation" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

51web.archive.org

1^st place

4theguardian.com

12^th place

11^th place

4docketalarm.com

8,228^th place

4,443^rd place

3reuters.com

49^th place

47^th place

3eff.org

3,285^th place

2,156^th place

3theverge.com

114^th place

90^th place

3uscourts.gov

2,275^th place

1,288^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

2amlaw.com

low place

2ftc.gov

3,796^th place

2,268^th place

2zdnet.com

786^th place

558^th place

2supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

2,160^th place

2scribd.com

482^nd place

552^nd place

2justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

1about.google

low place

1bloomberg.com

99^th place

77^th place

1bbc.com

20^th place

30^th place

1europa.eu

68^th place

117^th place

1wired.co.uk

2,053^rd place

1,340^th place

1businessinsider.com

140^th place

115^th place

1sfgate.com

166^th place

121^st place

1go.com

48^th place

39^th place

1courthousenews.com

4,146^th place

2,310^th place

1apnews.com

129^th place

89^th place

1fdazar.com

low place

1archive.org

6^th place

1npr.org

92^nd place

72^nd place

1hollywoodreporter.com

15^th place

16^th place

1austlii.edu.au

1,812^th place

995^th place

1jade.io

low place

1bennettandco.com.au

low place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1publishersweekly.com

619^th place

379^th place

1chinadaily.com.cn

831^st place

730^th place

1wantchinatimes.com

low place

8,845^th place

1ft.com

210^th place

157^th place

1tmcnet.com

low place

6,717^th place

1haaretz.com

497^th place

371^st place

1geektime.com

low place

1law.co.il

low place

1globes.co.il

1,102^nd place

3,237^th place

1dhillonlaw.com

low place

1techcrunch.com

187^th place

146^th place

1justice.gov

918^th place

556^th place

1ocregister.com

1,086^th place

618^th place

1findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

about.google

"About - Google". about.google. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.

amlaw.com

pdfserver.amlaw.com

"In House Playbook 2014" (PDF). The American Lawyer. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2015-03-20.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-30. Retrieved 2020-10-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

apnews.com

"AP Exclusive: Google tracks your movements, like it or not". Associated Press. 20 April 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2022.

archive.org

Google, Inc. v. American Blind and Wallpaper Factory, Inc. No. 03-cv-05340 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2007).

austlii.edu.au

classic.austlii.edu.au

"DUFFY v GOOGLE INC [2015] SASC 170 (27 October 2015)". AustLii. 19 August 2019. Retrieved June 8, 2020.

bbc.com

"EU court backs 'right to be forgotten' in Google case". BBC News. 13 May 2014. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2018.

bennettandco.com.au

Douglas M., Tharby A., and Border J. (May 7, 2020). "Google as publisher of everything defamatory on the internet: Defteros v Google LLC [2020] VSC 219". Bennett + Co. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

bloomberg.com

Forden, Sara. "Google Judge Accepts $22.5 Million FTC Privacy Settlement". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2014-03-18. Retrieved 18 March 2014.

businessinsider.com

Streib, Lauren. "Harvard Law Student Files Class Action Suit Against Google Over Buzz" Archived 2014-11-17 at the Wayback Machine, Business Insider, 18 February 2010. Retrieved on 08 October 2014.

chinadaily.com.cn

"Writer sues Google for copyright infringement". Chinadaily.com.cn. December 16, 2009. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved October 30, 2012.

courthousenews.com

"Case 5:18-cv-05062-EJD - Courthouse News Service" (PDF). Court House News. Retrieved 19 August 2022.

dhillonlaw.com

"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-06. Retrieved 2018-08-21.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

docketalarm.com

"Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages by Viacom against Google". Docket Alarm, Inc. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Opinion and Order Granting Summary Judgment that Defendant YouTube Qualifies for Protection of 17 U. S. C. § 512 (c) Against all of Plaintiffs' Claims for Direct and Secondary Copyright Infringement". Docket Alarm, Inc. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Granting Defendant YouTube's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment; Entering Judgement that Defendants are Protected by the Safe-Harbor Provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) from all of Plaintiffs Copyright Infringement Claims". Docket Alarm, Inc. April 18, 2013. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Docket Information for Viacom v. YouTube". Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.

eff.org

Samuels, Julie (2012-05-31). "No Copyrights on APIs: Judge Defends Interoperability and Innovation". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
McSherry, Corynne (2014-05-09). "Dangerous Decision in Oracle v. Google: Federal Circuit Reverses Sensible Lower Court Ruling on APIs". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
Higgins, Parker (2016-05-26). "EFF Applauds Jury Verdict In Favor of Fair Use in Oracle v. Google". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-27.

europa.eu

curia.europa.eu

"Press release No 70/14 (Judgment in Case C-131/12)" (PDF). CJEU. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-09-18. Retrieved 2015-03-16.

fdazar.com

"Google Tracking Lawsuit: Location Stored W/O Permission". Retrieved 19 August 2022.

findlaw.com

news.findlaw.com

Gonzales v. Google, Inc. Archived April 8, 2016, at the Wayback Machine January 18, 2006.

ft.com

/ Media – Google loses Linux patent lawsuit Archived September 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. Ft.com (April 23, 2011). Retrieved on May 29, 2011.

ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission-FTC (August 9, 2012). "Google Will Pay $22.5 Million to Settle FTC Charges it Misrepresented Privacy Assurances to Users of Apple's Safari Internet Browser". Archived from the original on March 18, 2014. Retrieved March 2, 2014.
Federal Trade Commission-FTC (November 20, 2012). "Statement by FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director David Vladeck Regarding Judges Approval of Google Safari Settlement". Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2014.

geektime.com

"$1B exit and you don't cut us in? No Waze Jose!". Geektime.com. March 30, 2014. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.

globes.co.il

גרינצייג, אבישי (2020-01-29). "המפתחים של Waze נגד המייסד: "ניכס לעצמו פרויקט שלא היה שלו"". Globes. Retrieved 2022-08-17.

go.com

abcnews.go.com

Heussner, Ki Mae. [1] Archived 2020-08-11 at the Wayback Machine "Google Buzz Draws Class-Action Suit From Harvard Student"], "ABC News", 18 February 2010.

haaretz.com

"Waze founder in 2006: Maps belong to the community". Haaretz. March 31, 2014. Archived from the original on May 3, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.

hollywoodreporter.com

"Controversial 'Innocence of Muslims' Ruling Reversed By Appeals Court". The Hollywood Reporter. 18 May 2015. Archived from the original on 2020-06-12. Retrieved 2020-06-12.

jade.io

"Defteros v Google LLC [2020] VSC 219". Jade.io. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2020.

justia.com

docs.justia.com

"ORDER granting 829 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Google Inc for Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al". Justia Dockets & Filings. Archived from the original on December 29, 2016.

law.justia.com

"Elliott v. Google, Inc., No. 15-15809 (9th Cir. 2017)". Justia Law. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved November 28, 2017.

justice.gov

"Justice Department Sues Google for Monopolizing Digital Advertising Technologies". Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice. 2023-01-24.

law.co.il

"Supreme court dismisses suit as baseless". law.co.il. February 2, 2019. Archived from the original on February 12, 2019. Retrieved February 2, 2019.

npr.org

Chappell, Bill (18 May 2015). "Google Wins Copyright And Speech Case Over 'Innocence Of Muslims' Video". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19. Retrieved 2020-06-12.

nytimes.com

Hafner, Katie (23 October 2006). "We're Google. So Sue Us". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
David Streitfeld (13 May 2014). "European Court Lets Users Erase Records on Web". New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2014.

ocregister.com

"Gonzales: Google suit no invasion of privacy". Orange County Register. January 21, 2006.

publishersweekly.com

Google Wins: Court Issues a Ringing Endorsement of Google Books Archived 2015-02-21 at the Wayback Machine, Publishers weekly, Nov 14, 2013

reuters.com

"Australia's top court finds Google not liable for defamation". Reuters. 2022-08-17. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
Kaira, Aditya. "India antitrust probe finds Google abused Android dominance, report shows". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
Bartz, Diane. "Microsoft executive says Google deals kept Bing small". Reuters.

scribd.com

"18-CIV-00442 - ARNE WILBERG vs. GOOGLE, INC, et al - Recruitment - Discrimination". Scribd. Archived from the original on 3 March 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
Google Gender Pay Lawsuit

sfgate.com

blog.sfgate.com

"Local class action complaint filed over Google Buzz" Archived 2014-10-23 at the Wayback Machine, "SF Gate", 17 February 2010.

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Travis, Hannibal (2008). "Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European Union: Copyright, Safe Harbors, and International Law". Notre Dame Law Review. 55: 391–92. SSRN 1221642.

supremecourt.gov

"Docket for 18-956". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on 2021-04-05. Retrieved 2021-04-05.
"18-956 Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. 2021-04-05. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-04-05. Retrieved 2021-04-05.

techcrunch.com

Hatmaker, Taylor (May 10, 2022). "Match Group sues Google over 'monopoly power' in Android app payments". techcrunch.com. Retrieved May 12, 2022.

theguardian.com

"Google wins defamation battle as Australia's high court finds tech giant not a publisher". The Guardian. 2022-08-17. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
Levin, Sam (26 May 2017). "Accused of underpaying women, Google says it's too expensive to get wage data". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
Levin, Sam (17 July 2017). "Google told to hand over salary details in gender equality court battle". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
Gibbs, Samuel (11 March 2014). "Google facing US lawsuit over $66 of in-app purchases". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.

theverge.com

Brandom, Russell (13 August 2020). "Epic is suing Google over Fortnite's removal from the Google Play Store". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020.
Statt, Nick (13 August 2020). "Epic Games is suing Apple". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 13 August 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020.
Hollister, Sean (27 June 2017). "The Epic v. Google lawsuit finally makes sense". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 21 December 2021.

tmcnet.com

zone.tmcnet.com

"Accountant Sues Waze for Allegedly Stolen Code". tmcnet.com. March 31, 2014. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.

uscourts.gov

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov

Garcia v. Google Archived 2014-07-04 at the Wayback Machine, no. 12-57302 (9th Cir. Feb. 26, 2014). Accessed November 3, 2014.
"Garcia v. Google" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-05-21. Retrieved 2020-06-12.

cafc.uscourts.gov

"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-10-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

wantchinatimes.com

"Google told to pay Chinese writer US$800 for copyright violation" Archived 2014-11-06 at the Wayback Machine, Want China Times (Taiwan), January 20, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.

web.archive.org

Hafner, Katie (23 October 2006). "We're Google. So Sue Us". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
"In House Playbook 2014" (PDF). The American Lawyer. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2015-03-20.
"About - Google". about.google. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
Forden, Sara. "Google Judge Accepts $22.5 Million FTC Privacy Settlement". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2014-03-18. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
Federal Trade Commission-FTC (August 9, 2012). "Google Will Pay $22.5 Million to Settle FTC Charges it Misrepresented Privacy Assurances to Users of Apple's Safari Internet Browser". Archived from the original on March 18, 2014. Retrieved March 2, 2014.
Federal Trade Commission-FTC (November 20, 2012). "Statement by FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director David Vladeck Regarding Judges Approval of Google Safari Settlement". Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2014.
"EU court backs 'right to be forgotten' in Google case". BBC News. 13 May 2014. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
"Press release No 70/14 (Judgment in Case C-131/12)" (PDF). CJEU. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-09-18. Retrieved 2015-03-16.
David Streitfeld (13 May 2014). "European Court Lets Users Erase Records on Web". New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2014.
Julia Powles (15 May 2014). "What we can salvage from 'right to be forgotten' ruling". Wired.co.uk. Archived from the original on 16 May 2014. Retrieved 16 May 2014.
Streib, Lauren. "Harvard Law Student Files Class Action Suit Against Google Over Buzz" Archived 2014-11-17 at the Wayback Machine, Business Insider, 18 February 2010. Retrieved on 08 October 2014.
"Local class action complaint filed over Google Buzz" Archived 2014-10-23 at the Wayback Machine, "SF Gate", 17 February 2010.
Heussner, Ki Mae. [1] Archived 2020-08-11 at the Wayback Machine "Google Buzz Draws Class-Action Suit From Harvard Student"], "ABC News", 18 February 2010.
Garcia v. Google Archived 2014-07-04 at the Wayback Machine, no. 12-57302 (9th Cir. Feb. 26, 2014). Accessed November 3, 2014.
Chappell, Bill (18 May 2015). "Google Wins Copyright And Speech Case Over 'Innocence Of Muslims' Video". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
"Controversial 'Innocence of Muslims' Ruling Reversed By Appeals Court". The Hollywood Reporter. 18 May 2015. Archived from the original on 2020-06-12. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
"Garcia v. Google" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-05-21. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
"Defteros v Google LLC [2020] VSC 219". Jade.io. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
Douglas M., Tharby A., and Border J. (May 7, 2020). "Google as publisher of everything defamatory on the internet: Defteros v Google LLC [2020] VSC 219". Bennett + Co. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
"Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages by Viacom against Google". Docket Alarm, Inc. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Opinion and Order Granting Summary Judgment that Defendant YouTube Qualifies for Protection of 17 U. S. C. § 512 (c) Against all of Plaintiffs' Claims for Direct and Secondary Copyright Infringement". Docket Alarm, Inc. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Granting Defendant YouTube's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment; Entering Judgement that Defendants are Protected by the Safe-Harbor Provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) from all of Plaintiffs Copyright Infringement Claims". Docket Alarm, Inc. April 18, 2013. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
"Docket Information for Viacom v. YouTube". Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2013.
Google Wins: Court Issues a Ringing Endorsement of Google Books Archived 2015-02-21 at the Wayback Machine, Publishers weekly, Nov 14, 2013
"Writer sues Google for copyright infringement". Chinadaily.com.cn. December 16, 2009. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved October 30, 2012.
"Google told to pay Chinese writer US$800 for copyright violation" Archived 2014-11-06 at the Wayback Machine, Want China Times (Taiwan), January 20, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
Idiotic Anti-Linux & Google Patent Decision Archived May 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. ZDNet. Retrieved on May 29, 2011.
/ Media – Google loses Linux patent lawsuit Archived September 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. Ft.com (April 23, 2011). Retrieved on May 29, 2011.
"ORDER granting 829 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Google Inc for Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al". Justia Dockets & Filings. Archived from the original on December 29, 2016.
Samuels, Julie (2012-05-31). "No Copyrights on APIs: Judge Defends Interoperability and Innovation". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
McSherry, Corynne (2014-05-09). "Dangerous Decision in Oracle v. Google: Federal Circuit Reverses Sensible Lower Court Ruling on APIs". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-30. Retrieved 2020-10-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
Higgins, Parker (2016-05-26). "EFF Applauds Jury Verdict In Favor of Fair Use in Oracle v. Google". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-10-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
"Docket for 18-956". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on 2021-04-05. Retrieved 2021-04-05.
"18-956 Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. 2021-04-05. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-04-05. Retrieved 2021-04-05.
"Waze – Copyrights and licenses". Archived from the original on March 4, 2011. Retrieved 2015-04-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
"Accountant Sues Waze for Allegedly Stolen Code". tmcnet.com. March 31, 2014. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.
"Waze founder in 2006: Maps belong to the community". Haaretz. March 31, 2014. Archived from the original on May 3, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.
"$1B exit and you don't cut us in? No Waze Jose!". Geektime.com. March 30, 2014. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2014.
"Supreme court dismisses suit as baseless". law.co.il. February 2, 2019. Archived from the original on February 12, 2019. Retrieved February 2, 2019.
"Elliott v. Google, Inc., No. 15-15809 (9th Cir. 2017)". Justia Law. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved November 28, 2017.
Levin, Sam (26 May 2017). "Accused of underpaying women, Google says it's too expensive to get wage data". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
Levin, Sam (17 July 2017). "Google told to hand over salary details in gender equality court battle". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-06. Retrieved 2018-08-21.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
"18-CIV-00442 - ARNE WILBERG vs. GOOGLE, INC, et al - Recruitment - Discrimination". Scribd. Archived from the original on 3 March 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
Gibbs, Samuel (11 March 2014). "Google facing US lawsuit over $66 of in-app purchases". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
Brandom, Russell (13 August 2020). "Epic is suing Google over Fortnite's removal from the Google Play Store". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020.
Statt, Nick (13 August 2020). "Epic Games is suing Apple". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 13 August 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020.
Hollister, Sean (27 June 2017). "The Epic v. Google lawsuit finally makes sense". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
Gonzales v. Google, Inc. Archived April 8, 2016, at the Wayback Machine January 18, 2006.

wired.co.uk

Julia Powles (15 May 2014). "What we can salvage from 'right to be forgotten' ruling". Wired.co.uk. Archived from the original on 16 May 2014. Retrieved 16 May 2014.

zdnet.com

Idiotic Anti-Linux & Google Patent Decision Archived May 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. ZDNet. Retrieved on May 29, 2011.
Kwan, Campbell (October 11, 2021). "Google countersues Epic for allegedly breaching Play Store contract". ZDNet. Retrieved December 21, 2021.