Graphology (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Graphology" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
4th place
4th place
3rd place
3rd place
11th place
8th place
7th place
7th place
198th place
154th place
low place
low place
5,748th place
3,460th place
1,220th place
1,102nd place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
124th place
544th place
low place
low place
8th place
10th place
9th place
13th place
207th place
136th place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
69th place
59th place
low place
low place

andrebreton.fr (Global: low place; English: low place)

apa.org (Global: 1,220th place; English: 1,102nd place)

psycnet.apa.org

  • Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele (2006). "Discredited psychological treatments and tests: A Delphi poll". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. ISSN 1939-1323. Five tests rated by at least 25% of the experts in terms of being discredited for a specific purpose received mean scores of 4.0 or higher: Luscher Color Test, Szondi Test, handwriting analysis (graphology), Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test (for assessment of neuropsychological impairment), eneagrams, and Lowenfeld Mosaic Test

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; English: 14th place)

arxiv.org (Global: 69th place; English: 59th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; English: 10th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

  • Duffy, Jonathan; Giles Wilson (2005-02-01). "Writing wrongs". BBC News Magazine. Archived from the original on 2012-02-24. Retrieved 2008-06-24.

bnf.fr (Global: 124th place; English: 544th place)

gallica.bnf.fr

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

bps.org.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

cms.bps.org.uk

chedd-angier.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

  • Driver, Russell W.; Buckley, M. Ronald; Frink, Dwight D. (April 1996). "Should We Write Off Graphology?". International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 4 (2): 78–86. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.1996.tb00062.x.
  • Furnham, Adrian; Gunter, Barrie (January 1987). "Graphology and personality: Another failure to validate graphological analysis". Personality and Individual Differences. 8 (3): 433–435. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(87)90045-6.
  • Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele (2006). "Discredited psychological treatments and tests: A Delphi poll". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. ISSN 1939-1323. Five tests rated by at least 25% of the experts in terms of being discredited for a specific purpose received mean scores of 4.0 or higher: Luscher Color Test, Szondi Test, handwriting analysis (graphology), Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test (for assessment of neuropsychological impairment), eneagrams, and Lowenfeld Mosaic Test
  • Hartley, James (January 1991). "Sex Differences in Handwriting: a comment on Spear". British Educational Research Journal. 17 (2): 141–145. doi:10.1080/0141192910170204.
  • King, Roy N.; Koehler, Derek J. (2000). "Illusory correlations in graphological inference". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 6 (4): 336–348. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.135.8305. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.6.4.336. PMID 11218342.
  • Neter, Efrat; Ben-Shakhar, Gershon (January 1989). "The predictive validity of graphological inferences: A meta-analytic approach". Personality and Individual Differences. 10 (7): 737–745. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90120-7.
  • Ware, J E; Williams, R G (February 1975). "The Dr. Fox effect: a study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction". Academic Medicine. 50 (2): 149–156. doi:10.1097/00001888-197502000-00006. PMID 1120118.
  • Tallent, Norman (1958). "On individualizing the psychologist's clinical evaluation". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 14 (3): 243–244. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195807)14:3<243::aid-jclp2270140307>3.0.co;2-a. PMID 13549608.
  • Hartley, James (1991). "Sex Differences in Handwriting: A comment on Spear". British Educational Research Journal. 17 (2): 141–145. doi:10.1080/0141192910170204.
  • Mandrekar, Jayawant N. (1 September 2010). "Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment". Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 5 (9): 1315–1316. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d. PMID 20736804.
  • Illouz, Evyatar; (Omid) David, Eli; Netanyahu, Nathan S. (2018). "Handwriting-Based Gender Classification Using End-to-End Deep Neural Networks". Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11141. pp. 613–621. arXiv:1912.01816. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01424-7_60. ISBN 978-3-030-01423-0. S2CID 52909281.
  • Bradley, Sean (March 2015). "Handwriting and Gender: A multi-use data set". Journal of Statistics Education. 23 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/10691898.2015.11889721. S2CID 123033133.
  • Hamid, Sarah; Loewenthal, Kate Miriam (1996). "Inferring Gender from Handwriting in Urdu and English". The Journal of Social Psychology. 136 (6): 778–782. doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9712254. PMID 9043207.
  • Spear, Margaret Goddard (1989). "Differences between the Written Work of Boys and Girls". British Educational Research Journal. 15 (3): 271–277. doi:10.1080/0141192890150304.
  • Burr, Vivien (2002). "Judging Gender from Samples of Adult Handwriting: Accuracy and Use of Cues". The Journal of Social Psychology. 142 (6): 691–700. doi:10.1080/00224540209603929. PMID 12450344. S2CID 39650656.

eeoc.gov (Global: low place; English: low place)

finedictionary.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

grafologiaemerson.com.ar (Global: low place; English: low place)

news-ces.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "Grafologia" [Graphology]. Centro de Estudios Superiores (in Spanish). 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-11-06. Retrieved 2016-11-12.

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

obh.hu (Global: low place; English: low place)

abiweb.obh.hu

pbs.org (Global: 198th place; English: 154th place)

  • "Barry Beyerstein Q&A". Ask the Scientists. Scientific American Frontiers. Archived from the original on 2007-02-20. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. i.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like'".

psu.edu (Global: 207th place; English: 136th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

sciences360.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

skeptoid.com (Global: 5,748th place; English: 3,460th place)

survata.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

blog.survata.com

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele (2006). "Discredited psychological treatments and tests: A Delphi poll". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. ISSN 1939-1323. Five tests rated by at least 25% of the experts in terms of being discredited for a specific purpose received mean scores of 4.0 or higher: Luscher Color Test, Szondi Test, handwriting analysis (graphology), Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test (for assessment of neuropsychological impairment), eneagrams, and Lowenfeld Mosaic Test

youtube.com (Global: 9th place; English: 13th place)