HTML (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "HTML" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
691st place
581st place
1st place
1st place
214th place
176th place
8,307th place
5,922nd place
2nd place
2nd place
415th place
327th place
6th place
6th place
8,411th place
8,648th place
1,959th place
1,611th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
629th place
610th place
5,099th place
3,425th place
5,990th place
3,752nd place
low place
low place
388th place
265th place
786th place
558th place
272nd place
225th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
311th place
239th place
896th place
674th place
6,219th place
4,029th place
153rd place
151st place
2,431st place
1,607th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

archive.org

arstechnica.com

cern.ch

info.cern.ch

cnet.com

doi.org

  • Berners-Lee, Tim; Connelly, Daniel (November 1995). "Hypertext Markup Language – 2.0". ietf.org. Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC1866. RFC 1866. S2CID 6628570. Archived from the original on August 11, 2010. Retrieved December 1, 2010. This document thus defines an HTML 2.0 (to distinguish it from the previous informal specifications). Future (generally upwardly compatible) versions of HTML with new features will be released with higher version numbers.
  • Bradner, Scott O. (1997). "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels". Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC2119. RFC 2119. Retrieved December 7, 2008. 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.

hsivonen.iki.fi

htmlhelp.com

ietf.org

tools.ietf.org

datatracker.ietf.org

ietf.org

  • Bradner, Scott O. (1997). "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels". Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC2119. RFC 2119. Retrieved December 7, 2008. 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.

invisiblerevolution.net

iso.org

jkorpela.fi

microsoft.com

msdn.microsoft.com

mit.edu

lost-contact.mit.edu

netmagazine.com

scientificamerican.com

  • Berners-Lee, Tim; Hendler, James; Lassila, Ora (May 1, 2001). "The Semantic Web". Scientific American. Retrieved October 2, 2009.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Berners-Lee, Tim; Connelly, Daniel (November 1995). "Hypertext Markup Language – 2.0". ietf.org. Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC1866. RFC 1866. S2CID 6628570. Archived from the original on August 11, 2010. Retrieved December 1, 2010. This document thus defines an HTML 2.0 (to distinguish it from the previous informal specifications). Future (generally upwardly compatible) versions of HTML with new features will be released with higher version numbers.

soton.ac.uk

eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk

tcd.ie

scss.tcd.ie

unicode.org

usenix.org

vt.edu

ei.cs.vt.edu

w3.org

w3.org

lists.w3.org

dev.w3.org

w3schools.com

web.archive.org

whatwg.org

wiki.whatwg.org

html.spec.whatwg.org

blog.whatwg.org

xhtml.com

zdnet.com